Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/291,031

SOLAR CELL MODULE AND SOLAR POWER GENERATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Examiner
PILLAY, DEVINA
Art Unit
1726
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allow Rate
339 granted / 778 resolved
-21.4% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
840
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 778 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites wherein each of the plurality of solar cells is “a segment of a solar cell substrate.” It is unclear what a segment of a solar cell substrate is. It is unclear what a solar cell substrate is. Is it a substrate underlying solar cells or is it something else? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 6, and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Giron (US 20150136207 A1) in view of Yaoi (US 20130240012 A1). Regarding claim 1, Giron discloses a solar cell module comprising (see Figs. 1-4 [0053]-[0071]): a plurality of solar cells (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, 6 [0061]) spaced apart from each other and arranged in a first direction (top to bottom in plane view along A-A’ direction in Fig. 1) and a second direction (left to right in plane view of Fig. 1) perpendicular to the first direction; a connection member (5 and/or 7 [0064]) electrically connecting the plurality of solar cells, wherein the plurality of solar cells is sealed by a resin layer (3 [0060]) having a curved-face shape and is arranged along the curved-face shape and a solar cell group in which the connection member electrically connects first solar cells (see Fig. 1, series and parallel interconnection shown). However, Giron does not disclose in the plurality of solar, solar cells which are adjacent to each other in the first direction are electrically connected in series with each other and in the plurality of solar cells, solar cells that are adjacent to each other in the second direction are electrically connected in parallel with each other. Yaoi discloses an interconnection scheme (see Fig. 6B and see annotated drawing below) between solar cells in rows and columns where the plurality of solar cells that are adjacent to each other in the first direction are electrically connected in series with each other and second solar cells, in the plurality of solar cells, that are adjacent to each other in the second direction, are electrically connected in parallel with each other and an edge electrode wire connected to the connection member, close to an edge of the solar cell group, wherein: the connection member includes a first connection member and a second connection member, the first solar cells are connected in series with each other by the first connection member disposed in the first direction, the second solar cells are connected in parallel with each other by the second connection member disposed in the second direction, and the connection member is connected to the edge electrode wire via an intermediate connection wire other and further discloses that this interconnection scheme aids suppressing the influence of a shaded area in each photovoltaic module as well so as to further improve resistance to shaded areas ([0030] [0103]) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to modify the interconnection scheme between solar cells in rows and columns of Giron so that the plurality of solar cells that are adjacent to each other in the first direction are electrically connected in series with each other and second solar cells, in the plurality of solar cells, that are adjacent to each other in the second direction, are electrically connected in parallel by using the interconnection scheme wiring scheme as disclosed by Yaoi because this aids suppressing the influence of a shaded area in each photovoltaic module as well so as to further improve resistance to shaded areas. Giron discloses that an edge electrode wire (7) can have an extension direction (see Fig. 1). Yaoi shows an edge electrode wire out of a module (See M1, in Fig. 7B) which extends in a second direction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art at the time of firing to have the edge electrode wire of modified Giron to extend in the second direction because extending an electrode wire is known and extending it in a direction will make it is easier for access and interconnection. PNG media_image1.png 729 662 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, modified Giron discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. In addition, Giron discloses a solar power generation system comprising module above (see rejection of claim 1), the solar module installed on an installation surface having a curved shape (see 1, in Fig. 2, [0059]). Regarding claim 8, modified Giron discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. In addition, Giron discloses wherein the installation surface is a surface of a vehicle ([0059]). Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Giron (US 20150136207 A1) in view of Yaoi (US 20130240012 A1) as applied to claims 1, 6, and 8 above and in further view of Zhang (US 20220384667 A1). Regarding claim 10, modified Giron discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Giron does discloses that the solar cell can be formed of monocrystalline silicon, however, does not disclose that it is a segment of a silicon wafer sheet. Zhang discloses that solar cells which can be interconnected intro string can be formed from a single large silicon sheet ([0055]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to have the solar cells of Giron be formed in a manner as disclosed by Zhang because Zhang discloses that solar cell modules can be formed of solar cell strings which are formed from solar cell pieces of a single sheet. Response to Arguments Applicant argues that Giron and Yaoi, either singly or in any combination thereof, do not disclose, teach, or suggest, at least, "an edge electrode wire connected to the connection member and disposed, along the second direction, close to an edge of the solar cell group, wherein: the connection member includes a first connection member and a second connection member, the first solar cells are connected in series with each other by the first connection member disposed in the first direction, the second solar cells are connected in parallel with each other by the second connection member disposed in the second direction, and the connection member is connected to the edge electrode wire via an intermediate connection wire," as recites in claim 1. The rejection has been modified of Giron in view of Yaoi to have the above claimed feature, please see additional mapping provided and annotated Fig. 6b of Yaoi above. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 10 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEVINA PILLAY whose telephone number is (571)270-1180. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey T Barton can be reached at 517-272-1307. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DEVINA PILLAY Primary Examiner Art Unit 1726 /DEVINA PILLAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Nov 07, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604560
SOLAR CELLS FORMED VIA ALUMINUM ELECTROPLATING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603600
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR EFFICIENT CONVERSION OF HEAT TO ELECTRICITY VIA EMISSION OF CHARACTERISTIC RADIATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588412
Thermoelectric element, thermoelectric generator, Peltier element, Peltier cooler, and methods manufacturing thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581857
INTEGRATED THERMOELECTRIC DEVICE TO MITIGATE INTEGRATED CIRCUIT HOT SPOTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580267
BATTERY FRAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+26.6%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 778 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month