Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/291,411

POWER CONTROL CONFIGURATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 23, 2024
Examiner
AYOTUNDE, AYODEJI O
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
588 granted / 710 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-14, 23-28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fakoorian et al., US2019/0124598 A1, and further in view of Balasubramanian et al., US2017/0265148 A1. Regarding claim 1, Fakoorian teaches A user equipment (UE) for wireless communication (Fig. 11 item 1105, par. 0165; The device 1105 may be an example of or include the components of a UE 115), comprising: a memory (par. 0165; memory 1125); and one or more processors (par. 0165; processor 1120), coupled to the memory, configured to: receive signaling identifying a plurality of power control configurations, wherein each power control configuration, of the plurality of power control configurations, includes one or more power control parameters (par. 0109, 0113; the base station 105-c may transmit the one or more power control parameters via RRC signaling, and the UE 115-c may identify a subset of power control parameters based on the indication of the process.); and transmit uplink traffic using a power control configuration, of the plurality of power control configurations (par. 0114; the UE 115-c may transmit the uplink channel that corresponds to the process in accordance with the identified subset of the power control parameters.). Fakoorian fails to teach the following recited limitation. However, Balasubramanian teaches transmit uplink traffic using a power control configuration, of the plurality of power control configurations, selected based at least in part on a channel type (par. 0092; the UE transmitting data (i.e., uplink traffic) containing adjusted transmission power (i.e., interpreted as power control configurations) based on priority of data (i.e., interpreted as channel type) carried in the one or more packets.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine Fakoorian’s teachings with Balasubramanian’s teachings in order to manage uplink transmission power at the UE (Balasubramanian, par. 0091). Regarding claims 2 and 24, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claims 1 and 23. Balasubramanian further teaches wherein the power control configuration is selected based at least in part on a traffic type or a traffic priority (par. 0083). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine Fakoorian’s teachings with Balasubramanian’s teachings in order to manage uplink transmission power at the UE (Balasubramanian, par. 0091). Regarding claims 3 and 25, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claims 1 and 23. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the channel type is at least one of: a physical random access channel, a physical uplink control channel, a physical uplink shared channel, or a sounding reference signal (par. 0005). Regarding claims 4 and 26, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claims 1 and 23. Fakoorian further teaches wherein power control configurations, of the plurality of power control configurations, differ with respect to at least one of: a power control parameter, or a pathloss reference signal (par. 0050). Regarding claims 5 and 27, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claims 1 and 23. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the signaling includes one of radio resource control signaling, a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) (MAC-CE), or downlink control information (par. 0005). Regarding claims 6 and 28, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claims 1 and 23. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: select the power control configuration from the plurality of power control configurations based at least in part on a received indication or a static rule (par. 0027). Regarding claim 7, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claim 1. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the power control configuration includes one or more power control parameters associated with a transmission configuration indicator state (par. 0049). Regarding claim 8, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claim 7. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the transmission configuration indicator state is associated with one or more power control parameter set lists corresponding to one or more channel types (par. 0049), wherein a power control parameter set list, of the one or more power control parameter set lists, includes one or more power control parameter sets corresponding to one or more traffic types or priorities (par. 0049), and wherein the one or more power control parameters of the power control configuration are based at least in part on a power control parameter set of the one or more power control parameter sets (par. 0049). Regarding claim 9, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claim 8. Fakoorian further teaches wherein information identifying the association between the transmission configuration indicator state and the one or more power control parameter set lists is received in connection with transmission configuration indicator state activation signaling (par. 0049). Regarding claim 10, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claim 1. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the power control configuration includes one or more power control parameters associated with a channel object (par. 0020). Regarding claim 11, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claim 10. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the power control configuration includes one or more power control parameter sets corresponding to one or more traffic types or priorities (par. 0088). Regarding claim 12, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claim 1. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the UE is configured with a plurality of resource sets or transmission types, wherein each resource set or transmission type, of the plurality of resource sets or transmission types, is associated with one or more power control parameter sets, wherein each power control parameter set corresponds to a traffic type or priority (par. 0049). Regarding claim 13, Fakoorian and Balasubramanian teach all the limitations in claim 1. Fakoorian further teaches wherein the power control configuration is based at least in part on a UE capability reported by the UE (par. 0099). Regarding claim 14, Fakoorian teaches A UE for wireless communication (Fig. 11 item 1105, par. 0165; The device 1105 may be an example of or include the components of a UE 115), comprising: a memory (par. 0165; memory 1125); and one or more processors (par. 0165; processor 1120), coupled to the memory, configured to: receive, from a base station, information configuring a set of resources associated with a set of pathloss reference signals (par. 0098; The first base station 105-a may provide an indication of the SRS process to the first UE 115-a in DCI 210. Based on the indicated process, the first UE 115-a may select parameters corresponding to the indicated SRS process from the previously provided set of power control parameters.); and identify a pathloss reference signal, of the set of pathloss reference signals, based at least in part on a UE capability (par. 0099; The first UE 115-a may identify the corresponding subset of parameters to use for the power control loop of the SRS process based on the set of power control parameters 205 and the indicated process (e.g., the subset of parameters are P.sub.O.sub._.sub.PUSCH(j) and α(j)).). Fakoorian fails to teach the following recited limitation. However, Balasubramanian teaches communicate with the base station based at least in part on identifying the pathloss reference signal (par. 0037; Some of the access points 105 may communicate with the UEs 115 for which each communication link 125 may be a multi-carrier signal modulated which may be sent on a different carrier and may carry control information (e.g., reference signals, control channels, etc.), overhead information, data, etc.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine Fakoorian’s teachings with Balasubramanian’s teachings in order to manage uplink transmission power at the UE (Balasubramanian, par. 0091). Regarding claim 23, Fakoorian teaches A base station for wireless communication (Fig. 7 item 705, par. 0135; the device 705 may be a base station 105), comprising: a memory (par. 0135; memory 725); and one or more processors (par. 0135; a processor 720), coupled to the memory, configured to: transmit signaling identifying a plurality of power control configurations, wherein each power control configuration, of the plurality of power control configurations, includes one or more power control parameters (par. 0109, 0113; the base station 105-c may transmit the one or more power control parameters via RRC signaling, and the UE 115-c may identify a subset of power control parameters based on the indication of the process.); and receive uplink traffic transmitted using a power control configuration, of the plurality of power control configurations (par. 0114; the UE 115-c may transmit the uplink channel that corresponds to the process in accordance with the identified subset of the power control parameters.). Fakoorian fails to teach the following recited limitation. However, Balasubramanian teaches receive uplink traffic transmitted using a power control configuration, of the plurality of power control configurations, associated with a channel type (par. 0092; the UE transmitting data (i.e., uplink traffic) containing adjusted transmission power (i.e., interpreted as power control configurations) based on priority of data (i.e., interpreted as channel type) carried in the one or more packets.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine Fakoorian’s teachings with Balasubramanian’s teachings in order to manage uplink transmission power at the UE (Balasubramanian, par. 0091). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AYODEJI O AYOTUNDE whose telephone number is (571)270-7983. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:00am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yuwen Pan can be reached at 571-272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AYODEJI O AYOTUNDE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 17, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598011
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TESTING DYNAMIC BEAM ADAPTIVE RADIO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (RRM) AND DEMODULATION REQUIREMENTS IN OVER THE AIR (OTA) TEST SETUP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596188
POSITIONING METHOD USING MULTIPLE DEVICES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597987
REPEATER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE REPEATER SYSTEM FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587218
Wireless Receiver Circuitry with Local Feedback Protection
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574859
SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL TRIGGERING TECHNIQUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month