Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/291,886

WIRELESSLY POWERED MEDICAL IMPLANT FOR TREATMENT OF SLEEP-DISORDERED BREATHING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 24, 2024
Examiner
GETZOW, SCOTT M
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cochlear Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
864 granted / 1073 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1114
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1073 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claim(s) 1-4,6,8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1),102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gross (2013/0261693). 1. (Original) An apparatus comprising: first circuitry configured to be implanted on or within a recipient’s body, the first circuitry configured to apply stimulation signals to at least one muscle of a recipient and/or to at least one neuron configured to control the at least one muscle; (see at least figure 2 which shows electrodes 42,44 and circuitry 46) second circuitry configured to be implanted on or within the recipient’s body, the second circuitry configured to wirelessly receive electrical power from a power source external to the recipient’s body and to provide at least a portion of the received electrical power to the first circuitry, (see at least ¶105,106) the second circuitry comprising a plurality of coils, each coil of the plurality of coils comprising at least one electrically conductive conduit encircling a center axis of the coil, the coils configured to be implanted on or within the recipient’s body with different orientations and/or positions relative to one another. (at least figure 2 shows a plurality of coils 48,50,52 indifferent orientations to each other. Further, the coils are considered to be conductive conduits that encircle a center axis since they are coiled cylindrically) 2. (Original) The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first circuitry comprises at least one stimulation electrode configured to be implanted on or within the recipient’s body and to apply the stimulation signals to a portion of the tongue of the recipient and/or to a portion of a hypoglossal nerve of the recipient during a sleep session of the recipient. (see at least figure 2 which shows electrodes 42,44. Where the stimulation is applied is considered to be intended use, not a structural limitation. Further, ¶86 teaches stimulating the hypoglossal nerve) 3. (Original) The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the at least one stimulation electrode comprises a cuff electrode and/or a surface electrode, the at least one stimulation electrode configured to apply an electrical voltage and/or current to the portion of the hypoglossal nerve. (see at least ¶29,86) 4. (Currently Amended) The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the coils are configured to be implanted within a lower jaw region, an upper jaw region, and/or a neck region of the recipient’s body. (see at least figure 2) 6. (Currently Amended) The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the center axes of at least two coils of the plurality of coils are substantially perpendicular to one another. (see figure 2) 8. (Currently Amended) The apparatus of claim 1, wherein at least one coil of the plurality of coils is substantially cylindrical with a longitudinal axis that is parallel to and/or coincident with the center axis of the coil. (see figure 2) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim(s) 5,7,12,14,16,17,18,19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gross (2013/0261693) and Deininger et al (2021/0121706). 5. (Currently Amended) The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of power transmitting coils external to the recipient’s body, the plurality of power transmitting coils configured to generate a time-varying magnetic flux that extends through at least one coil of the plurality of coils, the at least one coil configured to respond to the time-varying magnetic flux by generating a time-varying electrical current. (Deininger teaches magnetic flux between a primary coil and a secondary coil, see at least ¶33. It would have been obvious to use such with the device of Gross since magnetic flux using coils is old and well known as an efficient method of power transfer) 7. (Currently Amended) The apparatus of claim 1, wherein at least one coil of the plurality of coils is substantially planar and perpendicular to the center axis of the coil. (at least figure 2 of Deininger teaches a planar secondary coil 22b. It would have been obvious to use planar coils for the coils of Gross since they are well known in the art and would allow for a more streamlined device) 12. (Original) A method comprising: receiving a time-varying magnetic flux using at least one coil of a plurality of coils implanted on or within a recipient’s body, the coils having different orientations and/or positions relative to one another; (as mentioned supra, Gross teaches coils 48,50,52 that receive power, see at least figure 2 and ¶105,106. Deininger teaches magnetic flux between a primary coil and a secondary coil, see at least ¶33. It would have been obvious to use such with the device of Gross since magnetic flux using coils is old and well known as an efficient method of power transfer) generating electrical power using the received time-varying magnetic flux; (as mentioned, Deininger teaches producing magnetic flux, ¶33) generating stimulation signals using at least some of the electrical power; (see at least ¶105,106 of Gross) applying the stimulation signals to at least one muscle of the recipient’s body and/or to at least one neuron configured to control the at least one muscle. (see at least ¶106 of Gross) 14. (Currently Amended) The method of claim 12, wherein each coil of the plurality of coils comprises at least one electrically conductive conduit encircling a center axis of the coil. (The coils 48,50,52 of Gross are considered to be conductive conduits that encircle a center axis since they are coiled cylindrically) 16. (Original) An apparatus comprising: at least one implantable electrode configured to apply stimulation signals to at least one muscle of a recipient and/or to at least one neuron configured to control the at least one muscle; (see at least figure 2 which shows electrodes 42,44 and circuitry 46) a plurality of implantable RF coils having different orientations and/or positions relative to one another, the plurality of implantable RF coils configured to wirelessly receive electrical power from an external power source; (see at least figure 2 and ¶105 of Gross. The coils 48,50,52 will receive Rf energy since RF is sent by the external device) processor circuitry configured to provide at least a portion of the electrical power received by the plurality of implantable RF coils to the at least one implantable electrode. (at least ¶105 of Gross teaches circuitry 46 that enable power to be sent to electrodes for stimulation. Deininger teaches use of a processor, see at least ¶29,30. It would have been obvious to use a processor with the device of Gross since they are well known in the art to efficiently control application of stimulation) 17. — (Original) The apparatus of claim 16, further comprising at least one capacitor configured to store at least a portion of the received electrical power, the processor circuitry further configured to selectively direct stored electrical power from the at least one capacitor to the at least one implantable electrode. (see at least ¶107 of Gross. It is considered to be obvious that the processor control the stimulation via the electrodes, which is well known in the art) 18. (Currently Amended) The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the at least one muscle comprises a portion of the tongue of the recipient and the at least one neuron comprises a portion of a hypoglossal nerve of the recipient. (see at least figure 2 which shows electrodes 42,44. Where the stimulation is applied is considered to be intended use, not a structural limitation. Further, ¶86 teaches stimulating the hypoglossal nerve) 19. (Currently Amended) The apparatus of claim 16, wherein at least one of the RF coils is substantially planar or substantially cylindrical and has a center axis that is substantially perpendicular to a center axis of at least one other of the RF coils. (see at least figure 2 of Gross which shows cylindrical coils) Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gross (2013/0261693) and Deininger et al (2021/0121706), and further in view of Pitts (2002/0049479). 13. (Original) The method of claim 12, wherein the at least one muscle comprises at least one tongue muscle, said applying the stimulation signals performed during a sleep session of the recipient to treat obstructive sleep apnea. (Pitts is considered to more explicitly teach stimulating the tongue during sleep time, see at least ¶13,14. It would have been obvious to stimulate the tongue with the device of Gross since it would help treat sleep apnea in a predictable manner) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-11,15,20,21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Scott M. Getzow whose telephone number is (571)272-4946. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Klein can be reached at 571-270-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Scott M. Getzow/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 24, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599772
Selection of Sensing Electrodes in a Spinal Cord Stimulator System Using Sensed Stimulation Artifacts
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582817
USE OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS FOR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582823
FLEXIBLE STIMULATION PATTERNING FRAMEWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569188
DEEP SOUND STIMULATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SLEEP REGULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569397
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LASER TREATMENT OF A DERMATOLOGIC CONDITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+0.2%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1073 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month