Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/292,001

ANTI-CD47 ANTIBODIES AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 25, 2024
Priority
Jul 30, 2021 — SE 2150980-7 +1 more
Examiner
DENT, ALANA HARRIS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LUDWIG-MAXIMILIANS-UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
329 granted / 743 resolved
-15.7% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
803
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1, 3, 5, 23, 26-31, 36-39, 42, 51, 54 and 55 are pending. Claims 2, 4, 6-22, 24, 25, 32-35, 40, 41, 43-50, 52 and 53 have been cancelled. Claims 54 and 55 have been added. Claims 1, 3, 5, 23, 26-31, 36, 38, 39, 42 and 51 have been amended. Claims 1, 3, 5, 23, 26-31, 36-39, 42, 51, 54 and 55 are examined on the merits. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The information disclosure statement filed January 25, 2024 fails to comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97, 1.98 and MPEP § 609 because the publications, cite numbers 1 and 3 are not legible copies, as well as cite number 1 does not state the publication date. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered as to the merits. Applicant is advised that the date of any re-submission of any item of information contained in this information disclosure statement or the submission of any missing element(s) will be the date of submission for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements based on the time of filing the statement, including all certification requirements for statements under 37 CFR 1.97(e). See MPEP § 609.05(a). Specification 4. The disclosure is objected to because it contains an embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code, see sentence bridging pages 1 and 2; page 25, lines 10-12; and page 27, lines 4 and 5. Applicant is requested to review the entire document. Applicant is required to delete the embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code; references to websites should be limited to the top-level domain name without any prefix such as http:// or other browser-executable code. See MPEP § 608.01. Claim Objections 5. Claims 1 and 42 is objected to because of the following informalities: a. claim 1, lines 4, 11, 14; recite “…selected from the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: [X]…, however there is only one (1) sequence cited. The language should be consistent with the option(s).; b. the conjunction, or should be cited after the semicolon on line 3 of segment (v); and c. antibodies, MGC018 and BTH1704 is italicized on line 2 of steps (ii) and (v) line 2, respectively of claim 42. It is art know to italicize family, genus, species and subspecies names. An antibody is not commonly italicized as the noted scientific nomenclature. Correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 7. Claims 5, 23, 26-31, 42 and 55 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. a. Claim 5 (viii), line 3; claim 23, line 6; claims 27 and 30, lines 4 and 5; and on line 4 of claims 26, 28 and 29 cite “preferably” and/or “more preferably”. This is an exemplary term, which is indefinite because the scope of the claims is not clear, as well as it is not clear if the language following the term is an example or preference and not clearly limitations. Hence, the metes and bounds cannot be determined. b. Claim 42 cites “such as” in each step segment, (i)-(vii). This phrase is regarded as exemplary language. Hence, the claim is indefinite because the scope of the claim is not clear. The metes and bounds cannot be determined. 8. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the interaction" in line 19. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 9. Claims 51 and 54 recite the limitation "the treatment" in line 3 and line 1, respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter 10. Claims 3, 36-39 and 55 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 11. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to ALANA HARRIS DENT whose telephone number is (571)272-0831. The Examiner works a flexible schedule, however she can generally be reached 8AM-8PM, Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Julie Wu can be reached on 571-272-5205. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALANA HARRIS DENT Primary Examiner Art Unit 1643 July 8, 2026 /Alana Harris Dent/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704512
Modulators of the function of the core domain of annexins, and uses thereof in autoimmune and/or cancer therapy
9y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699095
CANCER DIAGNOSIS USING KI-67
6y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12601742
METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR TREATING ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594344
PRODUCTION OF EXOSOMES AND USES THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589165
METHODS FOR TREATING BLADDER TUMORS WITH VIRAL NANOPARTICLE CONJUGATES AND IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS.
4y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+32.1%)
3y 8m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month