Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/292,159

Pressure Vessel Assembly and Motor Vehicle

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 25, 2024
Examiner
ELOSHWAY, NIKI MARINA
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
1002 granted / 1576 resolved
-6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
76 currently pending
Career history
1652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1576 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on February 10, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16, 18, 20, 21, 23 and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luerken et al. (EP2565513) in view of Caspari (DE102017006715A1). Regarding claim 16, Luerken et al. teaches a pressure vessel assembly, shown in figure 5, comprising a plurality of pressure vessels 2, a plurality of fixed bearings 10, wherein first longitudinal ends of the pressure vessels are held by the fixed bearings (figure 5), and a plurality of floating bearings 11, wherein second longitudinal ends of the pressure vessels, which are arranged at an opposite end from the first longitudinal ends, are held by the floating bearings (figure 5), wherein longitudinal axes of the pressure vessels are oriented parallel to one another (figure 5). Further regarding claim 16, Luerken et al. discloses the claimed invention except for the floating bearings having an inner sleeve, outer sleeve and elastic material. Caspari teaches that it is known to provide an assembly where the floating bearings have an inner sleeve, outer sleeve and elastic material (see element 9 in figure 10). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the assembly of Luerken et al. with the floating bearings have an inner sleeve, outer sleeve and elastic material, as taught by Caspari, in order to secure the end of the pressure vessel in a manner that allows for surface irregularities. The assembly of Luerken, as modified by Caspari, teaches floating bearings (10 taught by Caspari) each comprise an inner sleeve (47 of Caspari) fastened to a second longitudinal end of the pressure vessel (1 of Caspari), an outer sleeve (shown in figures 15-17 of Caspari) distinct and separate from a floating bearing mount (the bearing mount is the component to which the outer sleeve is attached to support the tank), and a flexible and/or elastic material (31 of Caspari) arranged between the inner sleeve (47 of Caspari) and the outer sleeve (figure 10 of Caspari), wherein the flexible and/or elastic material forms an annular layer between the inner sleeve and the outer sleeve (figure 14) and is configured to permit limited axial movement of the inner sleeve relative to the outer sleeve by elastic deformation of the flexible and/or elastic material, and wherein an inner most surface of the outer sleeve (at 29 of Caspari) is positioned radially outward from an outermost surface of the inner sleeve (53 of Caspari; figures 2, 10 and 11 of Caspari). Regarding claim 18, the outer sleeve is fastened in a floating bearing mount, as modified by Caspari (see figure 3 of Caspari). Regarding claim 20, the inner sleeve being longer than the outer sleeve, as shown in figure 10 of Caspari. Regarding claim 21, the flexible and/or elastic material is rubber (shown at 31 in Caspari). Regarding claim 23, the floating bearings having a pin at 11 of Caspari. Regarding claim 29, at least one media line which is fluidically connected to the pressure vessels at the first longitudinal ends, as shown in figure 5 (see elements 19, 20, 21). Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luerken et al. (EP2565513) in view of Caspari (DE102017006715A1), as applied to claim 16 above, and further in view of Tzivanopoulos et al. (DE102018219559A1). Regarding claim 19, the modified assembly of Luerken et al. discloses the claimed invention except for the screwing connection. Tzivanopoulos et al. teaches that it is known to provide an assembly with a threaded connection between the bearing and the end of the pressure vessel (see 118 in figure 25). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the modified assembly of Luerken et al. with a threaded connection between the vessel and the bearing, as taught by Tzivanopoulos et al., in order to prevent accidental disconnection of the pressure vessel from the bearing. Claim 22 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luerken et al. (EP2565513) in view of Caspari (DE102017006715A1), as applied to claim 16 above, and further in view of Xu et al. (CN 208831911U). Regarding claim 22, the modified assembly of Luerken et al. discloses the claimed invention except for the inner sleeve and the outer sleeve being vulcanized onto the flexible and/or elastic material. Xu et al. teaches that it is known to provide an assembly with surrounding elements being vulcanized onto the flexible and/or elastic material (see elements 31 and 32). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the modified assembly of Luerken et al. with the inner sleeve and the outer sleeve being vulcanized onto the flexible and/or elastic material, as taught by Xu et al., in order to secure and protect the elements of the floating ring. Claims 24-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luerken et al. (EP2565513) in view of Caspari (DE102017006715A1), as applied to claim 16 above, and further in view of Baur et al. (DE 102013014958A1). Regarding claim 24, the modified assembly of Luerken et al. discloses the claimed invention except for the fixed bearing having a rubber ring. Baur et al. teaches that it is known to provide an assembly where the fixed bearings having a rubber ring (see element 9 and 7). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the modified assembly of Luerken et al. with the fixed bearings having a rubber ring, as taught by Baur et al., in order to secure the end of the pressure vessel in a manner that allows for surface irregularities. Regarding claim 25, the fixed bearings each comprise a rubber ring which surrounds the first longitudinal end of the pressure vessel (figure 3 of Baur et al.). Regarding claim 26, the rubber ring is held in a form-fitting manner by an outer ring which is arranged directly radially outside the rubber ring (see elements 13 and 7 in figure 3 of Baur et al.). Regarding claim 27, a plurality of frontal pocket-shaped and/or kidney-shaped recesses are formed in the rubber ring (see seal between 7 and 13 forms pocket shaped recesses to receive threads of 7 and 13 of Baur et al.). Claim 28 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luerken et al. (EP2565513) in view of Caspari (DE102017006715A1), and Kirk et al. (U.S. 5,515,997), as applied to claim 25 above, and further in view of Tzivanopoulos et al. (DE102018219559A1). Regarding claim 28, the modified assembly of Luerken et al. discloses the claimed invention except for the screwing connection. Tzivanopoulos et al. teaches that it is known to provide an assembly with a threaded connection between the bearing and the end of the pressure vessel (see 118 in figure 25). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the modified assembly of Luerken et al. with a threaded connection between the vessel and the bearing, as taught by Tzivanopoulos et al., in order to prevent accidental disconnection of the pressure vessel from the bearing. Claim 30 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luerken et al. (EP2565513) in view of Caspari (DE102017006715A1), as applied to claim 16 above, and further in view of Sawai (DE102018119087A1). Regarding claim 30, the modified assembly of Luerken et al. discloses the claimed invention except for the assembly being in a vehicle. Sawai teaches that it is known to provide an assembly in a vehicle (see figure 1). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the modified assembly of Luerken et al. in a vehicle, as taught by Sawai, in order to use the assembly to allow the vehicle to function. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed July 22, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues the secondary reference of Caspari (DE102017006715A1) does not teach a floating bearing having an outer structure that is a sleeve. It is the examiner’s position that the outer structure shown in figure 8 can be considered a sleeve to the degree set forth in the claims. The outer housing of Caspari has a cylindrical inner surface with a generally annular shape which allows it to be considered a sleeve. The term sleeve does not require a strictly cylindrical inner and outer surface. The inner wall can be considered the inner sleeve and the outer wall can be considered the outer sleeve. The claims do not include structural limitations that define the inner and outer sleeves of the present inventions over the inner wall and outer wall of the housing of Caspari. Both the inner and outer walls have cylindrical surfaces which allow them to be considered sleeves. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NIKI MARINA ELOSHWAY whose telephone number is (571)272-4538. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 7: 00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Aviles can be reached at 571-270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NIKI M ELOSHWAY/Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 25, 2024
Application Filed
May 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 22, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600560
HEATING UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589917
CLOSURES WITH TAMPER EVIDENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12564280
WIRELESS DRINK CONTAINER FOR MONITORING HYDRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12553661
TRIM BREAKER WITH LIGHT-DIFFUSING OPTICAL FIBER FOR VACUUM INSULATED STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12546319
Can, And A Method For Producing Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+24.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1576 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month