Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/292,320

HANDOVER INFORMATION REPORTING METHOD AND USER EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 25, 2024
Examiner
DAI, GABRIELLE NICOLE
Art Unit
2681
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-62.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
24
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.9%
+20.9% vs TC avg
§102
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/25/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xie et al., US 2022 0400415 A1 (hereinafter “Xie”) in view of Jiang, US 2020 0045602 A1 (hereinafter “Jiang”). Regarding Claim 3, Xie teaches a User Equipment (UE) (Page 9, Paragraphs 290-291, Fig. 5, terminal information reporting apparatus 50, transceiver module 51), comprising: a processor; and a memory in electronic communication with the processor, wherein instructions stored in the memory are executable (Page 9, Paragraph 289, Fig. 4, terminal 40, processor 42, memory 43; Page 12, Paragraph 371) to: if the UE detects a Radio Link failure (RLF) and has stored therein a conditional handover configuration (Xie discloses a reporting method upon detection of a radio link failure, Page 3, Paragraphs 105-106, radio link failure [RLF] report, as well as a stored conditional handover configuration in Page 1, Paragraph 3, conditional handover; Pages 2-3, Paragraphs 70-91, terminal, information of a connection failure or a secondary cell addition failure; Fig. 2, element 4, conditional handover command sent from serving cell to terminal) set time information in a RLF report to a time that has elapsed between reception of a latest conditional handover configuration and the detection of the RLF (Page 3, Paragraphs 92-104, information of the failure, time difference, reception of the conditional handover configuration by the terminal and failure detection). Xie fails to fully teach the limitation:the UE detects a Radio Link failure (RLF) However, Jiang further teaches the limitation: the UE detects a Radio Link failure (RLF) (Jiang, Page 5, Paragraphs 122-134, Fig. 5, apparatus for cell handover, modules 410-480) Although Xie addresses the remaining limitations of claim 3, Jiang demonstrates the following limitations of a User Equipment (UE) (Jiang, Page 3, Paragraph 76, Fig. 1B, UE 20), comprising: a processor; and a memory in electronic communication with the processor, wherein instructions stored in the memory (Jiang, Pages 5-6, Paragraphs 135-138, 146, and 149, Fig. 6, apparatus 600, processing component 602, memory 604, communication component 616) are executable to: if the UE detects a Radio Link failure (RLF) and has stored therein a conditional handover configuration (Jiang, Page 3, Paragraph 63, UE does not execute cell handover immediately when receiving the conditional handover command, only when a target tell meets a handover condition; Pages 4-5, Paragraphs 95-110, Fig. 2-3, conditional handover of the UE), set time information in a RLF report to a time that has elapsed between reception of a latest conditional handover configuration and the detection of the RLF (Jiang, Paragraphs 95-96, Steps 210, preset handover command; Paragraphs 97-109, Steps 220-270, radio link failure detection, information recording in the radio link-failure report; Paragraphs 105-110, time information, time interval). Jiang and Xie are considered to be analogous to the claimed invention because they are in the same field of hand-off or reselection arrangements of wireless communication. Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Xie to incorporate the teachings of Jiang in further demonstrate the user equipment’s ability to detect radio link failure. Doing so would enable a communication device with an enhanced ability to detect failure in a conditional handover configuration scenario. Regarding Claim 4, Xie in view of Jiang teaches a reporting method of User Equipment (UE) (Xie, Pages 6-7, Paragraphs 213-240, Fig. 1, Steps 11-12, UE reporting method; Jiang, Pages 4-5, Paragraphs 95-110, Fig. 2-3, conditional handover of the UE, Steps 210-270, Paragraphs 111-117, Steps 310-320), comprising: if the UE detects a Radio Link failure (RLF) and has stored therein a conditional handover configuration (Xie, Pages 6-7, Paragraphs 214-228, Step 11, reporting, from the UE to a network device, information of a connection failure; Jiang, Paragraphs 95-96, Steps 210, preset handover command), setting time information in a RLF report to a time that has elapsed between reception of a latest conditional handover configuration and the detection of the RLF (Xie, Pages 6-7, Paragraph 215-218, connection failure type, information; Paragraph 219-227, time difference; Page 7, Paragraphs 230-240, Step 12, reporting measurement information of the cell, source cell, target cell, candidate target cell; Page 7, Paragraph 234, radio link failure [RLF] report; Jiang, Pages 4-5, Paragraphs 95-96, Steps 210, preset handover command; Paragraphs 97-109, Steps 220-270, radio link failure detection, information recording in the radio link-failure report; Paragraphs 105-110, time information, time interval). Regarding Claim 5, Xie in view of Jiang teaches a base station apparatus (Xie, Page 3, Paragraph 104, source base station; Jiang, Page 3, Paragraph 76, Fig. 1B, eNB 10), comprising: a processor; and a memory in electronic communication with the processor, wherein instructions stored in the memory are executable (Xie, Page 10-11, Paragraph 318, Paragraph 343, Fig. 6, network device, processor 62, memory 63; Page 12, Paragraph 371) to: transmit a conditional handover configuration to User Equipment (UE) (Xie, Page 3, Paragraph 104, source base station, target base station to which the terminal is handed over; Page 10, Paragraphs 318, transceiver 61; Jiang, Pages 3-4, Paragraph 62, Fig. 1A, Step 110, handover command transmitted by a base station to UE; Paragraph 95-96, preset handover command transmitted by a base station), thereby causing the UE to: store the conditional handover configuration (Xie, Page 1, Paragraph 3, conditional handover; Jiang, Page 3, Paragraph 63, UE does not execute cell handover immediately when receiving the conditional handover command, only when a target tell meets a handover condition); and if the UE detects a Radio Link failure (RLF), set time information in a RLF report to a time that has elapsed between reception of a latest conditional handover configuration and the detection of the RLF (Xie, Pages 6-7, Paragraphs 213-240, Fig. 1, Steps 11-12; Jiang, Pages 4-5, Paragraphs 95-110, Fig. 2-3, conditional handover of the UE, Steps 210-270, Paragraphs 111-117, Steps 310-320). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GABRIELLE N DAI whose telephone number is (571)272-6693. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Thu. 8:30am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, AKWASI SARPONG can be reached at (571) 270-3438. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GABRIELLE N DAI/Examiner, Art Unit 2681 /AKWASI M SARPONG/SPE, Art Unit 2681 01/10/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month