Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/292,450

TRAY, STACK OF TRAYS AND METHOD FOR LOADING/UNLOADING TRAYS

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Jan 26, 2024
Priority
Jul 29, 2021 — CH 070117/2021 +1 more
Examiner
PERREAULT, ANDREW D
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Alpla Werke Alwin Lehner GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
2 (Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
463 granted / 996 resolved
-23.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1047
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
77.6%
+37.6% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 996 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 28-39 in the reply filed on 10/22/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 40-53 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on the above date. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 34 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 34, Applicant states “can brought” and Applicant fails to make clear Applicant’s intent. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 28-34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bosch (DE 10230524 A1) in view of Afferbach (US 20080272132 A1) Bosch discloses: 28. (NEW) A tray (figs 1-4) for storing and/or transporting goods, in particular plastic containers (capable of performing the above intended use), comprising two first side walls and two second side walls (side walls in fig 1 of 10, such as with 13s, 14s) and four corner elements (adjacent 25s, 26s), wherein the side walls are connected to the corner elements (as in figs 1-4), wherein the tray has a movable base (adjacent 12 and 24). With the exception of the following which is disclosed by Afferbach: plug connections (as shown in figs 1-16 including in fig 3b with 140 for example). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify Bosch in view of Afferbach (by providing plug connections) in order to provide enhanced connection and removability such as if the user is desired to be taken down for storage purposes and/or replaced damaged features. The Combined Reference discloses: 29. (NEW) The tray according to claim 28, wherein the tray (20) has at least two crossmembers , wherein two opposing side walls are connected to the at least two crossmembers (such as adjacent 21 as in fig 2 of Bosch). 30. (NEW) The tray according to claim 29, wherein the movable base rests on the crossmembers (fig 2 of Bosch). 31. (NEW) The tray according to claim 28, wherein the movable base has projections on a periphery thereof for increasing stability (such as projections of base as in fig 2 that are located at ends adjacent “21” of Bosch). 32. (NEW) The tray according to claim 31, wherein the projections can engage or be brought into engagement in corresponding recesses in the at least two crossmembers so that the movable base can be positioned in the tray (recessed are formed adjacent 21 and the corner, recess within L shape of Bosch). 33. (NEW) The tray according to claim 28, wherein the plug connections are deformable or deformed for fixing the first and/or the second side walls (device of Afferbach is plastic and would provide a degree of flex and deformation). 34-35, 37-39, wherein recesses are provided in the crossmembers that can brought into engagement with the first side walls of a second tray arranged below a first tray during the stacking of a plurality of trays, wherein the second side walls of the tray have a support element and a support so that the support element of a second side wall of a first tray is arrangeable on the support of a second side wall of a second tray during the stacking of a plurality of trays, wherein the stack is arranged on a frame, wherein the frame is engaged with recesses of the crossmembers of a bottommost tray, wherein the stack is arranged on a frame, wherein the frame is engaged with the support elements of the second side walls of a bottommost tray, wherein the stack has a cover, wherein the cover rests on corresponding supports of the second side walls of an uppermost tray. The Office notes the 112 rejection above. Nevertheless, Official Notice is taken, that it is old and conventional to provide wherein recesses are provided in the crossmembers that can brought into engagement with the first side walls of a second tray arranged below a first tray during the stacking of a plurality of trays, wherein the second side walls of the tray have a support element and a support so that the support element of a second side wall of a first tray is arrangeable on the support of a second side wall of a second tray during the stacking of a plurality of trays, wherein the stack is arranged on a frame, wherein the frame is engaged with recesses of the crossmembers of a bottommost tray, wherein the stack is arranged on a frame, wherein the frame is engaged with the support elements of the second side walls of a bottommost tray, wherein the stack has a cover, wherein the cover rests on corresponding supports of the second side walls of an uppermost tray. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made in view of the Official Notice to provide wherein recesses are provided in the crossmembers that can brought into engagement with the first side walls of a second tray arranged below a first tray during the stacking of a plurality of trays, wherein the second side walls of the tray have a support element and a support so that the support element of a second side wall of a first tray is arrangeable on the support of a second side wall of a second tray during the stacking of a plurality of trays, wherein the stack is arranged on a frame, wherein the frame is engaged with recesses of the crossmembers of a bottommost tray, wherein the stack is arranged on a frame, wherein the frame is engaged with the support elements of the second side walls of a bottommost tray, wherein the stack has a cover, wherein the cover rests on corresponding supports of the second side walls of an uppermost tray in order to provide further enhanced attachment and removability to the device, while also improving storage of the device, while further protecting contents. Potentially Allowable Subject Matter Claim 36 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be potentially allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims (with claims 28, 35, 36). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW D PERREAULT whose telephone number is (571)270-5427. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:00am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at (571)272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW D PERREAULT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 26, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Mar 16, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637274
HIDDEN STORAGE BOX
1y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629812
TOOL SET WITH INTERSPERSED DUAL STANDARD ELEMENTS
5y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631438
STACKABLE AND/OR NESTABLE BOX
2y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623811
STACKABLE STORAGE CRATE
3y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623822
STACKABLE STORAGE CONTAINERS WITH STACKING SELF-LOCK
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+18.6%)
3y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 996 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month