Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/292,512

USER EQUIPMENTS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 26, 2024
Examiner
CHANG, JUNGWON
Art Unit
2454
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
702 granted / 815 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
846
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.3%
+13.3% vs TC avg
§102
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 815 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office action is in response to the Application filed on 01/26/2024. Claims 1-2 are presented for examination. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed on 08/05/2021. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to Claims 1-2, the term “RRC” is indefinite because it is an abbreviation that is not defined, and it is unclear whether it stands for “Radio Resource Control”. As to claims 1-2, the term “PUSCH” is indefinite because it is an abbreviation that is not defined, and it is unclear whether it stands for “Physical Uplink Shared Channel”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by FENG et al. (US 2024/0276487 A1). As to claims 1-2, FENG discloses the invention as claimed, including a user equipment (UE) (Fig. 1, 10) comprising: high-layer processing circuitry configured to acquire a first RRC parameter, a second RRC parameter, a third RRC parameter, and a fourth RRC parameter (Table 1; Table 11; ¶0072, “scheduled by a UL grant or RRC in the consecutive available slots. This method is called PUSCH repetition Type A, in which each slot contains only one repetition and the time domain for the repetitions of a transport block is the same in those slots as shown in FIG. 3”; ¶0075, “two types of transmission without dynamic grant are known as configured grant Type 1 and configured grant Type 2. In the configured grant Type 1, an uplink grant is provided by RRC”’ ¶0077, “PUSCH scheduled by DCI 0_2, an FH type is indicated by the higher layer parameter “frequency Hopping-ForDCIFormat0_2” in IE pusch-Config”; ¶0078, “DCI but not DCI 0_2, FH type is indicated by the higher layer parameter “frequency Hopping” in IE pusch-Config”; ¶0079, “PUSCH scheduled by the configured Grant type 1. FH type is indicated and FH is enabled by the same higher layer parameter “frequency Hopping” in IE ConfigredGrantConfig”; ¶0080, “PUSCH is scheduled by the configured Grant type 2 and DCI. FH type is indicated by higher layer parameter is “frequency Hopping” in IE ConfigredGrantConfig”; ¶0082, “PUSCH is scheduled by DCI 0_2, FH type is indicated by the higher layer parameter “frequency Hopping-ForDCIFormat0_2”; ¶0083, “PUSCH is scheduled by DCI 0_1. FH type is indicated by the higher layer parameter “frequency Hopping-ForDCIFormat0_1”; ¶0084, “PUSCH is scheduled by the configured Grant type 1, FH type is indicated and FH is enabled by the same higher layer parameter “frequency HoppingPUSCH-RepTypeB”; ¶0093, “The bundling size should be configured by higher layer parameter (e.g. PUSCH configuration or configured UL grant) or a DCI (e.g. DCI 0_x) field explicitly or implicitly”), and transmission circuitry configured to transmit a PUSCH in multiple slots (Fig. 4; ¶0033, “FIG. 9 illustrates a schematic view showing an example of TB over multi-slot (TBoMS) PUSCH”; ¶0066, “PUSCH transmission across multiple slots, it may refer to four PUSCH types”), wherein in a case that the first RRC parameter is set to pusch-RepTypeB (Table 1, “PUSCH Repetition Type B), the transmission circuitry is configured to perform frequency hopping (i.e., FH) for the PUSCH transmission based on the second RRC parameter set to interRepetition or interSlot (Table 1, “Interslot FH”, “Inter-repetition FH”; ¶0081, “PUSCH repetition type B can support inter-slot and inter-repetition frequency hopping”; ¶0086, “the repetition type comprises an indication of a repetition type A or a repetition type B of the repetitions of the transport block. In the repetition type A, two adjacent repetitions in the repetitions of the transport block are separately allocated to two slots. In the repetition type B, two adjacent nominal repetitions in the repetitions of the transport block are back-to-back allocated to one or more adjacent slots. The frequency hopping (FH) type of the frequency hopping function indicates one of the intra-slot FH or inter-slot FH applicable to the repetition type A, one of inter-slot FH or inter-repetition FH applicable to the repetition type B”; ¶0090, “PUSCH repetition Type B over multiple slots with inter-repetition FH and with inter-repetition bundling”), in a case that the first RRC parameter is set to pusch-RepTypeA (Table 1, “PUSCH Repetition Type A), the transmission circuitry is configured to perform frequency hopping for the PUSCH transmission based on the third RRC parameter set to interRepetition, interSlot, or intraSlot (Table 1, “Intraslot FH”, “Interslot FH”; ¶0051, “The mode configuration of the frequency hopping function comprises frequency hopping type indicating intra-slot frequency hopping or inter-slot frequency hopping”; ¶0086, “the repetition type comprises an indication of a repetition type A or a repetition type B of the repetitions of the transport block. In the repetition type A, two adjacent repetitions in the repetitions of the transport block are separately allocated to two slots. In the repetition type B, two adjacent nominal repetitions in the repetitions of the transport block are back-to-back allocated to one or more adjacent slots. The frequency hopping (FH) type of the frequency hopping function indicates one of the intra-slot FH or inter-slot FH applicable to the repetition type A, one of inter-slot FH or inter-repetition FH applicable to the repetition type B”; ¶0087, “The mode configuration of the frequency hopping function comprises frequency hopping type indicating intra-slot frequency hopping or inter-slot frequency hopping”; ¶0090, “PUSCH repetition Type A with inter-slot bundling. Case 2 shows PUSCH repetition Type A with inter-slot FH and with inter-repetition bundling), in a case that the first RRC parameter is set to pusch-RepTypeB and the second RRC parameter is not configured, the transmission circuitry is configured not to perform frequency hopping (i.e., without Frequency Hopping (FH)) for the PUSCH transmission (Table 11, “PUSCH repetition Type B”, “without frequency hopping (FH)”; ¶0086, “the repetition type comprises an indication of a repetition type A or a repetition type B of the repetitions of the transport block. In the repetition type A, two adjacent repetitions in the repetitions of the transport block are separately allocated to two slots. In the repetition type B, two adjacent nominal repetitions in the repetitions of the transport block are back-to-back allocated to one or more adjacent slots. The frequency hopping (FH) type of the frequency hopping function indicates one of the intra-slot FH or inter-slot FH applicable to the repetition type A, one of inter-slot FH or inter-repetition FH applicable to the repetition type B”; ¶0098, “PUSCH repetition Type B over multiple slots without inter-slot FH and with inter-slot bundling. Case 8 is an example of PUSCH repetition Type B over multiple slots without inter-slot FH”; ¶0168, “FIG. 15 shows a type B like example of TBoMS PUSCH scheduling with inter-slot TDW and without FH”), and in a case that the first RRC parameter is set to pusch-RepTypeA and the third RRC parameter is not configured (i.e., third frequency hopping mode is not configured), the transmission circuitry is configured to perform frequency hopping for the PUSCH transmission based on the fourth RRC parameter set to interSlot or intraSlot (Table 1, “Intra-slot”, “Inter-slot”; Table 11, “Intra-slot”, “Inter-slot”) (Table 11, “PUSCH repetition Type A”, “Intra-slot FH”, “Inter-slot FH”; ¶0086, “the repetition type comprises an indication of a repetition type A or a repetition type B of the repetitions of the transport block. In the repetition type A, two adjacent repetitions in the repetitions of the transport block are separately allocated to two slots. In the repetition type B, two adjacent nominal repetitions in the repetitions of the transport block are back-to-back allocated to one or more adjacent slots. The frequency hopping (FH) type of the frequency hopping function indicates one of the intra-slot FH or inter-slot FH applicable to the repetition type A, one of inter-slot FH or inter-repetition FH applicable to the repetition type B”; ¶0098, “Table 11 shows possible bundling combinations for PUSCH repetition type A/B. With reference to FIG. 5, Case 5 is an example of PUSCH repetition Type A with inter-slot FH and without inter-slot bundling. Case 6 is an example of PUSCH repetition Type A with inter-slot FH and without inter-repetition”; ¶0168, “a type A like example of TBoMS PUSCH scheduling with inter-slot TDW and without FH, a type A like example of multi-PUSCH scheduling with inter-TB TDW and without FH”). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. SHEN et al. (US 2024/0356691 A1), QIAO (US 2024/0380531 A1), GUO et al. (US 2024/0314771 A1), KHOSHNEVISAN et al. (US 2021/0218437 A1) disclose method and apparatus for physical uplink shared channel repetition with frequency hopping. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUNGWON CHANG whose telephone number is (571)272-3960. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, GLENTON BURGESS can be reached at (571)272-3949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUNGWON CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2454 February 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592853
AUTOMATED DETERMINATION OF ERROR-CAUSING NETWORK PACKETS UTILIZING NETWORK PACKET REPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587459
METHOD FOR DYNAMIC MULTIHOMING FOR RELIABLE DATA TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587498
METHOD AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE FOR PROCESSING DATA FOR TRANSMISSION FROM THE COMMUNICATION DEVICE TO A SECOND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581559
REPEATER ASSOCIATION FOR SIDELINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12561179
SYSTEMS AND METHODS CONFIGURED TO ENABLE AN OPERATING SYSTEM FOR CONNECTED COMPUTING THAT SUPPORTS USER USE OF SUITABLE TO USER PURPOSE RESOURCES SOURCED FROM ONE OR MORE RESOURCE ECOSPHERES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 815 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month