Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/292,874

COMPOSITE SOLID ELECTROLYTE AND ALL SOLID STATE BATTERY COMPRISING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 26, 2024
Priority
Apr 14, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0049292 +1 more
Examiner
DOVE, TRACY MAE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
493 granted / 714 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
762
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 714 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 1/26/24 and 4/9/24 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 8 and 13-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Duggal et al., US 2021/0359338 A1. Duggal teaches a solid state battery comprising a solid electrolyte disposed between a cathode and an anode [0010]. The solid electrolyte structure includes a ceramic electrolyte material. The ceramic material may be any ceramic material having low electronic conductivity with a high ionic transference number, high ionic conductivity, mechanical strength, temperature stability and which is electrochemically stable with the electrode materials. In one aspect, the ceramic material has an ionic conductivity of above 104 S/cm at room temperature. In one aspect, the ceramic material includes, but is not limited to, NASICON-type (sodium super ionic conductor), garnet-type, perovskite-type, LISICON-type (lithium super ionic conductor-type), LiPON-type (lithium phosphorus oxynitride), lithium nitride-type, sulfide-type, agryrodite-type, anti-perovskite-type or mixtures thereof [0047]. In one aspect, the lithium-containing garnet material may be lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO). In another aspect, the LLZO has the formula Li7La3Zr2O12. In another aspect, LLZO may be doped with aluminum, tantalum or gadolinium [0049]. In one aspect, the ceramic material may include Li3BO3 and a LISICON-type ceramic material Li10.42Si1.5P1.5Cl0.08O11.92 (contains Cl element) [0050]. The solid electrolyte material may include additional materials such as lithium borate and lithium tetraborate [0051]. The Examples of Duggal teach the solid electrolyte includes a garnet-type LLZO material and Li3BO3 [0080-0092]. Duggal teaches a mixture of a garnet-type ceramic material and a LISICON-type ceramic material may be used solid electrolyte material [0047]. Duggal teaches the solid electrolyte material may include additional materials such as lithium borate and lithium tetraborate [0051]. Thus, the claims are anticipated. Regarding claim 13, the electrolyte structure may have a porosity of about 50% by volume to about 80% by volume [0043]. The term “porosity” by volume used by Duggal refers to a value estimated by measuring the density of the porous electrolyte structure (ρ) and comparing it with the density of a 100% dense electrolyte structure based on the theoretical density (ρd) of the same solid electrolyte material according to equation 1. Porosity may also be measured experimentally by porometry [0034]. See also [0072]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-7 and 9-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Duggal et al., US 2021/0359338 A1 in view of Takano et al., US 2020/0106131 A1. Duggal teaches a solid state battery comprising a solid electrolyte disposed between a cathode and an anode [0010]. The solid electrolyte structure includes a ceramic electrolyte material. The ceramic material may be any ceramic material having low electronic conductivity with a high ionic transference number, high ionic conductivity, mechanical strength, temperature stability and which is electrochemically stable with the electrode materials. In one aspect, the ceramic material has an ionic conductivity of above 104 S/cm at room temperature. In one aspect, the ceramic material includes, but is not limited to, NASICON-type (sodium super ionic conductor), garnet-type, perovskite-type, LISICON-type (lithium super ionic conductor-type), LiPON-type (lithium phosphorus oxynitride), lithium nitride-type, sulfide-type, agryrodite-type, anti-perovskite-type or mixtures thereof [0047]. In one aspect, the lithium-containing garnet material may be lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO). In another aspect, the LLZO has the formula Li7La3Zr2O12. In another aspect, LLZO may be doped with aluminum, tantalum or gadolinium [0049]. In one aspect, the ceramic material may include Li3BO3 and a LISICON-type ceramic material Li10.42Si1.5P1.5Cl0.08O11.92 (contains Cl element) [0050]. The solid electrolyte material may include additional materials such as lithium borate and lithium tetraborate [0051]. The Examples of Duggal teach the solid electrolyte includes a garnet-type LLZO material and Li3BO3 [0080-0092]. Duggal teaches a mixture of a garnet-type ceramic material and a LISICON-type ceramic material may be used solid electrolyte material [0047]. Duggal teaches the solid electrolyte material may include additional materials such as lithium borate and lithium tetraborate [0051]. Duggal is silent regarding the amount of the garnet-type ceramic, LISICON-type ceramic containing Cl element and/or lithium borate contained in the solid electrolyte based on a total volume of the composite solid electrolyte. However, Takano teaches a solid electrolyte that includes a lithium ion conductive material having a garnet-type structure, a lithium ion conductive material having a LISICON-type structure, and a compound containing Li and B (abstract). When a volume ratio of the lithium ion conductive material having a garnet-type structure is X, a volume ratio of the lithium ion conductive material having a LISICON-type structure is Y, and a volume ratio of the oxide containing Li and B is Z, preferably, 10%≤X≤89.5%, 10%≤Y≤89.5%, 0.5%≤Z≤30%, and X+Y+Z≤100%, more preferably, 37%≤X≤70%, 20%≤Y≤60%, 3.0%≤Z≤20%, and 80%≤X+Y+Z 100% are satisfied [0033]. See Table 1 of Takano. PNG media_image1.png 226 822 media_image1.png Greyscale Therefore, the invention as a whole would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed because Takano teaches it was known in the art to provide a solid electrolyte having the claimed volume amounts of a garnet-type structure, a lithium ion conductive material having a LISICON-type structure, and a compound containing Li and B to achieve a high ionic conductivity [0005-0008] for a solid electrolyte of an all solid state battery. One of skill would have been motivated to use the volume amounts disclosed by Takano for the solid electrolyte composite disclosed by Duggal to achieve a high ionic conductivity solid electrolyte. * Claim(s) 20-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Duggal et al., US 2021/0359338 A1 in view of Kim et al., US 2021/0167418 A1. Duggal teaches a solid state battery comprising a solid electrolyte disposed between a cathode and an anode [0010]. The solid electrolyte structure includes a ceramic electrolyte material. The ceramic material may be any ceramic material having low electronic conductivity with a high ionic transference number, high ionic conductivity, mechanical strength, temperature stability and which is electrochemically stable with the electrode materials. In one aspect, the ceramic material has an ionic conductivity of above 104 S/cm at room temperature. In one aspect, the ceramic material includes, but is not limited to, NASICON-type (sodium super ionic conductor), garnet-type, perovskite-type, LISICON-type (lithium super ionic conductor-type), LiPON-type (lithium phosphorus oxynitride), lithium nitride-type, sulfide-type, agryrodite-type, anti-perovskite-type or mixtures thereof [0047]. In one aspect, the lithium-containing garnet material may be lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO). In another aspect, the LLZO has the formula Li7La3Zr2O12. In another aspect, LLZO may be doped with aluminum, tantalum or gadolinium [0049]. In one aspect, the ceramic material may include Li3BO3 and a LISICON-type ceramic material Li10.42Si1.5P1.5Cl0.08O11.92 (contains Cl element) [0050]. The solid electrolyte material may include additional materials such as lithium borate and lithium tetraborate [0051]. The Examples of Duggal teach the solid electrolyte includes a garnet-type LLZO material and Li3BO3 [0080-0092]. Duggal teaches a mixture of a garnet-type ceramic material and a LISICON-type ceramic material may be used solid electrolyte material [0047]. Duggal teaches the solid electrolyte material may include additional materials such as lithium borate and lithium tetraborate [0051]. Duggal does not explicitly teach the solid state battery has the structure recited by claim 20. However, Kim teaches a solid state battery having the structure shown by at least Figure 2: PNG media_image2.png 289 468 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein the all-solid battery 100 includes a body 110 that includes a solid electrolyte layer 111, and an anode layer 121 and a cathode layer 122 alternately stacked with the solid electrolyte layer 111 interposed therebetween, first and second external electrodes 131 and 132 disposed on external surfaces of the body 110. The anode layer 121 and the cathode layer 122 include an active electrode material, and the active electrode material included in the anode layer 121 and the cathode layer 122 may be the same non-polar material [0037]. One of skill in the art would have been motivated to use the composite electrolyte of Duggal in the known all solid battery structure of Kim because Duggal teaches and suggests the disclosed composite electrolyte is used for a solid state battery. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Takano (US2020/0259213) teaches a solid electrolyte layer containing a solid electrolyte having at least one of an oxide having a garnet-type crystal structure or an oxide having a LISICON-type crystal structure. Takano does not teaches a LISICON-type solid electrolyte containing Cl element. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRACY DOVE whose telephone number is (571)272-1285. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Buie-Hatcher can be reached at 571-270-3879. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRACY M DOVE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706312
Negative Electrode And Secondary Battery Including The Negative Electrode
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698216
HIGH-PERFORMANCE LITHIUM-NICKEL-MANGANESE-COBALT OXIDE (LNMCO) CATHODE MATERIAL FOR POWER BATTERIES AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12676390
FLEXIBLE WIRING COMPONENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673476
TEMPLATE AS WELL AS MANUFACTURING METHOD AND USE, INTERMEDIATE STRUCTURE AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY ELECTRODE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671105
SECONDARY BATTERY AND DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+9.9%)
3y 7m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 714 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month