Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/293,025

Agricultural Sample Packaging System and Related Methods

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Examiner
AHMED, MOBEEN
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Precision Planting, LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
211 granted / 341 resolved
-8.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
373
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 341 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/15/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-20 remain pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Independent claims 1 and 12 recite “die block disposed between the bulk material and sample collection chambers and forming a fixed wall relative to the bulk material and sample collection chambers”. However, the original specification does not mention the die block forms a fixed wall relative to the bulk material chamber and the sample collection chamber (see para 0068-0071 of PGPub of the instant application). The specification only describes how the die block walls forms a part of the walls of the bulk material chamber and sample collection chamber but not that die block wall is fixed relative to the two chambers. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1-16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1 and 12, the limitation “die block disposed between the bulk material and sample collection chambers and forming a fixed wall relative to the bulk material and sample collection chambers” is vague and unclear because the specification does not clearly describe the wall of the die block being fixed relative to the bulk material chamber and sample collection chamber. Therefore, it is unclear how the invention will perform when the die block wall is fixed relative to the bulk material and sample collection chambers. Claim 20 recites the limitation “the bulk sample chamber”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Examiner assumes the above limitation is referring to the bulk material chamber of claim 1. Claims 2-11 and 13-16 are rejected for depending on a rejected claim. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 17-19 are allowed. Claims 17-19 are allowed for reasons stated in Office action dated 6/11/2025). Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Examiner Notes There are no prior art rejections. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOBEEN AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-0356. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 11am to 7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached on 571-270-1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.A/Examiner, Art Unit 3731 /VERONICA MARTIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 10, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595150
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PACKAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583642
METHOD FOR FORMING PAIRS OF PACKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576999
SACHET AND PACKAGING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576496
Universal Chisel Attachment
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12534871
RODS FOR ENGAGING A TOOL OF A HAMMER WITHIN A HOUSING OF THE HAMMER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+5.9%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 341 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month