Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/293,075

UNDERWATER COMMUNICATION INTERFACE APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Examiner
KIM, KEON NMN
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
King Abdullah University Of Science And Technology
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
50 granted / 67 resolved
+6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
86
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
72.1%
+32.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 67 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/29/2024 has been considered by the examiner. Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it contains more than 150 words. Correction is required. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 7-11, 13-14, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Berumen (US 20130025904 A1, and hereinafter “Berumen”). Regarding claim 1, Berumen teaches an underwater communication interface apparatus (Fig. 1-2, Abstract : waterproof case for an electronic device at some appreciable water depth) comprising: a first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : front frame or panel 16, and side panels 18, 20, end panels 22, and cover 30 of waterproof housing 12) having an interior configured to house an electronic device with a touchscreen (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : computer C with touch-screen) in such a way that the touchscreen of the electronic device is adjacent to a first side of the first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : touch-screen of computer C is adjacent to a first side of the front frame or panel 16), wherein the first side of the first waterproof enclosure has a non-rigid transparent membrane (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : touch-screen membrane or panel 28 is on the first side of front frame or panel 16, and touch-screen membrane or panel 28 is thin, flexible, and transparent), and wherein the non-rigid transparent membrane is configured to allow a user to interact with the touchscreen of the electronic device (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : touch-screen membrane or panel 28 allows the user to contact the underlying touch-screen of computer C); a second waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : back panel 14 of waterproof housing 12) that houses a control module (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : a communication device which can have a second portion housed within the case 10), wherein the control module is configured to be operatively coupled to the electronic device and an external auxiliary device (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : the communication device have a second portion housed within the case 10 and connected to the computer C, and a first portion that is outside the case 10, exposed, and connected to the first portion); and a pressure balancing module (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36) coupled to the first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 are coupled to the front frame or panel 16 and side panels 18, 20), wherein the pressure balancing module is configured to balance pressure within the first waterproof enclosure relative to external ambient conditions (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0022], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 is configured to balance the pressure within the front frame or panel 16, and side panels 18, 20 relative to the external ambient conditions); wherein the first and second waterproof enclosures are physically coupled together (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : front frame 16, and side panels 18,20 and back panel 14 are physically coupled together); and wherein an internal pressure of the first waterproof enclosure enables the non-rigid transparent membrane of the first waterproof enclosure to remain within a predetermined distance to the touchscreen of the electronic device, wherein the predetermined distance is one that allows the touchscreen of the electronic device to receive inputs from the user via the non-rigid transparent membrane (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0022], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 is configured to balance the pressure within the front frame or panel 16, and side panels 18, 20 relative to the external ambient conditions such that the shape of the membrane 28, and the location of the membrane 28 relative to the touch-screen of computer C is adjusted and optimized for use; the user can contact the membrane 28 to contact the underlying touch-screen of computer C). Regarding claim 7, Berumen teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the control module further comprises a water sensor (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0040] : the case 10 can include fluid property sensors). Regarding claim 8, Berumen teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the control module is configured to communicate with the electronic device using wireless communications (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : the communication device can connect to the computer C via wired or wireless connection). Regarding claim 9, Berumen teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the control module includes a physical coupling configured to electrically link the control module to the electronic device (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : the communication device can connect to the computer C via wired or wireless connection). Regarding claim 10, Berumen teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first waterproof enclosure further comprises a rigid housing member (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : cover 30) and a rigid frame member (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : front frame or panel 16, side panels 18,20, and end panel 22), and wherein the rigid housing member is moveably coupled to the rigid frame member to allow the user to move the members between open and closed positions (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : cover 30 is moveably coupled to the front frame or panel 16, side panels 18,20, and end panel 22 to allow the user to move the cover 30 between an open and closed positions). Regarding claim 11, Berumen teaches the apparatus of claim 10, wherein the rigid housing member is configured to receive the electronic device, and wherein the rigid frame member surrounds the non-rigid transparent membrane so that the transparent membrane is positioned adjacent to the touchscreen of the electronic device when the rigid housing member and the rigid frame member are in the closed position (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : front frame or panel 16, side panels 18,20, and end panel 22 surrounds the touch-screen membrane or panel 28, and the touch-screen membrane or panel 28 is positioned adjacent to the computer C when the cover 30, and the panels 16, 18, 20, and 22 are the closed position). Regarding claim 13, Berumen teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first waterproof enclosure further comprises a port (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : opening on case 10 for tube of regulator 34) configured to be coupled to an air tube that is operatively coupled to the pressure balancing module (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : opening on case 10 for tube of regulator 34 is configured to be coupled to the regulator 34 and cartridge 32), wherein the port penetrates a wall of the first waterproof enclosure to allow air to be supplied to an interior portion of the first waterproof enclosure to control an internal pressure of the first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : opening on case 10 penetrates the wall of side panel 20 to allow air to be supplied to the interior portion of the case 10 to control an internal pressure of the case 10). Regarding claim 14, Berumen teaches the apparatus of claim 13, wherein the internal pressure of the first waterproof enclosure relative to an ambident water pressure is maintained to be equivalent to or slightly higher than the ambident water pressure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028-0032] : the internal pressure of case 10 relative to an ambient water pressure can be maintained to be equivalent to or slightly higher than the ambient water pressure). Regarding claim 20, Berumen teaches an underwater communication interface apparatus (Fig. 1-2, Abstract : waterproof case for an electronic device at some appreciable water depth) comprising: a common waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : housing 12 is waterproof) having an interior configured to house an electronic device with a touchscreen (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : computer C with touch-screen) in such a way that the touchscreen of the electronic device is adjacent to a first side of the first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : touch-screen of computer C is adjacent to a first side of the front frame or panel 16), wherein the first side of the first waterproof enclosure has a non-rigid transparent membrane (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : touch-screen membrane or panel 28 is on the first side of front frame or panel 16, and touch-screen membrane or panel 28 is thin, flexible, and transparent), and wherein the non-rigid transparent membrane is configured to allow a user to interact with the touchscreen of the electronic device (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : touch-screen membrane or panel 28 allows the user to contact the underlying touch-screen of computer C), wherein the common waterproof enclosure also houses a control module (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : a communication device which can have a second portion housed within the case 10), wherein the control module is configured to be operatively coupled to the electronic device and an external auxiliary device (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : the communication device have a second portion housed within the case 10 and connected to the computer C, and a first portion that is outside the case 10, exposed, and connected to the first portion); a pressure balancing module (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36) coupled to the common waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 are coupled to the housing 12), wherein the pressure balancing module is configured to balance pressure within the common waterproof enclosure relative to external ambient conditions (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0022], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 is configured to balance the pressure within the housing 12 relative to the external ambient conditions); wherein the common waterproof enclosure houses the electronic device and the control module in a common compartment or in separate compartments (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : the communication device have a second portion housed within the case 10 and connected to the computer C); and wherein an internal pressure of the common waterproof enclosure enables the non-rigid transparent membrane of the common waterproof enclosure to remain within a predetermined distance to the touchscreen of the electronic device, wherein the predetermined distance is one that allows the touchscreen of the electronic device to receive inputs from the user via the non-rigid transparent membrane (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0022], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 is configured to balance the pressure within the front frame or panel 16, and side panels 18, 20 relative to the external ambient conditions such that the shape of the membrane 28, and the location of the membrane 28 relative to the touch-screen of computer C is adjusted and optimized for use; the user can contact the membrane 28 to contact the underlying touch-screen of computer C). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Berumen (US 20130025904 A1, and hereinafter “Berumen”), in view of Cole et al. (US 20180154993 A1, and hereinafter “Cole”). Regarding claim 2, Brumen teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Brumen does not teach wherein the control module is operatively coupled to an interface cable that is operatively coupled to the external auxiliary device. However, Cole teaches wherein the control module (Fig. 1, [0045] : mobile device 49) is operatively coupled to an interface cable (Fig. 1, [0045] : mobile device 49 is coupled to a cable 53) that is operatively coupled to the external auxiliary device (Fig. 1, [0045] : mobile device 49 is coupled to a cable 53, and is operatively coupled to a buoy 55). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the interface cable as taught by Cole into Brumen’s apparatus by connecting the first portion and second portion of the communication device with the cable. The suggestion / motivation for doing so would be to provide an ethernet connection that functions underwater (([0004], [0007] of Cole), and is fast and durable ([0047] of Cole), Claim(s) 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Berumen and Cole combination as applied above, in view of Farr et al. (US 20160127042 A1, and hereinafter “Farr”). Regarding claim 3, Berumen as modified by Cole teaches the apparatus of claim 2. Berumen as modified by Cole does not teach wherein the external auxiliary device (Fig. 14, [0128] : diver node 1700) comprises an acoustic modem (Fig. 14, [0128] : optical modem 1706 and acoustic modem 1722 of diver node 1700) configured to receive and transmit acoustic signals . However, Farr teaches wherein the external auxiliary device comprises an acoustic modem configured to receive and transmit acoustic signals (Fig. 14, [0128] : acoustic modem 1722 includes acoustic transducer 1720). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the acoustic modem as taught by Farr into Berumen and Cole combination’s apparatus by modifying the communication device to include the acoustic modem. The suggestion / motivation for doing so would be to enable communication underwater that is high-speed and long-range (Abstract of Farr), and enable communication underwater that function in high-turbidity and poor-visibility conditions ([0121] of Farr) . Additionally, connecting an electronic device to a modem underwater is known as evidence by Brumen ([0035-0037]), and Cole (Fig. 1, [0045] of Cole). Regarding claim 4, Berumen as modified by Cole and Farr teaches the apparatus of claim 3, wherein the control module is configured to process data received from the acoustic modem (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] of Brumen, and Fig. 14, [0128] of Farr : the communication device is configured to process data received from the first portion). Regarding claim 5, Berumen as modified by Cole teaches the apparatus of claim 2. Berumen as modified by Cole does not teach wherein the external auxiliary device comprises an optical device configured to transmit and receive optical signals. However, Farr teaches wherein the external auxiliary device comprises an optical device (Fig. 14, [0128] : optical modem 1706 and acoustic modem 1722 of diver node 1700) configured to transmit and receive optical signals (Fig. 14, [0128] : optical modem 1706 includes receiver RX and transmitter TX). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the optical device as taught by Farr into Berumen and Cole combination’s apparatus by modifying the communication device to include the optical modem. The suggestion / motivation for doing so would be to enable communication underwater that is high-speed and long-range (Abstract of Farr), and enable communication underwater that function in high-turbidity and poor-visibility conditions ([0121] of Farr) . Additionally, connecting an electronic device to a modem underwater is known as evidence by Brumen ([0035-0037]), and Cole (Fig. 1, [0045] of Cole). Regarding claim 6, Berumen as modified by Cole and Farr teaches the apparatus of claim 5, wherein the control module is configured to process data received from optical device (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] of Brumen, and Fig. 14, [0128] of Farr : the communication device is configured to process data received from the first portion). Claim(s) 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Berumen (US 20130025904 A1, and hereinafter “Berumen”), in view of Thuillier (US 20200284773 A1, and hereinafter “Thuillier”). Regarding claim 12, Berumen teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second waterproof enclosure further comprises a rigid housing (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : back panel 14, front frame or panel), a cover portion (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : outer portion of back panel 14), and a seal portion (Fig. 1-2, [0008], [0016-0018], [0030] : panels 14, 16, 18, and 22 can be sealed with any material or technique forming a waterproof and fluid-tight seal, and cover 30 can be sealed with resilient waterproof seal 42). Berumen does not teach wherein the second waterproof enclosure further comprises an opening in the cover to allow water to contact the water sensor. However, Thuillier teaches wherein the second waterproof enclosure further comprises an opening (Fig. 1-2, [0033-0034] : openings 13) in the cover (Fig. 1-2, [0033-0034] : openings 13, 15, or 19 can be on the walls of the housing 2) to allow water to contact the water sensor (Fig. 1-2, [0033-0034] : openings 13 allow water or fluid to contact the fluid sensing device 100). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate opening in the cover as taught by Thuillier into Berumen’s apparatus by adding an opening on the panel to allow the fluid property sensor to contact the water. The suggestion / motivation for doing so would be to minimize the contamination of the fluid examined, and ([0064] of Thuillier), and provide protection for the sensor. Claim(s) 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Berumen (US 20130025904 A1, and hereinafter “Berumen”), in view of Farr et al. (US 20160127042 A1, and hereinafter “Farr”), and in further view of Cole et al. (US 20180154993 A1, and hereinafter “Cole”). Regarding claim 15, Berumen teaches an underwater communication interface apparatus (Fig. 1-2, Abstract : waterproof case for an electronic device at some appreciable water depth) comprising: a control module (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : a communication device which can have a second portion housed within the case 10) having a wireless communication interface configured to wirelessly communicate (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : the communication device can connect to the computer C via wired or wireless connection, and the communication device can include acoustic hydrophone or acoustic transmitters which enable wireless communication); a first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : front frame or panel 16, and side panels 18, 20, end panel 22, and cover 30 of waterproof housing 12) comprising a rigid housing member (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : cover 30) moveably coupled to a rigid frame member (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : cover 30 is moveably coupled to the front frame or panel 16, side panels 18,20, and end panel 22) such that the first waterproof enclosure has an open position (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : housing 12 with cover 30 removed) and a closed and sealed position (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0018] : housing 12 with cover 30), wherein an interior of the first waterproof enclosure is configured to house an electronic device with a touchscreen (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : computer C with touch-screen) in such a way that the touchscreen of the electronic device is adjacent to a first side of the first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : touch-screen of computer C is adjacent to a first side of the front frame or panel 16), wherein the first side of the first waterproof enclosure includes the rigid frame member (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : front frame or panel 16) surrounding a non-rigid transparent membrane (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : front frame or panel 16 surrounds the touch-screen membrane or panel 28, and touch-screen membrane or panel 28 is thin, flexible, and transparent), wherein the non-rigid transparent membrane is positioned adjacent to the touchscreen of the electronic device (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : front frame or panel 16 surrounds the touch-screen membrane or panel 28), and wherein the non-rigid transparent membrane is configured to allow a user to interact with the touchscreen of the electronic device (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : touch-screen membrane or panel 28 allows the user to contact the underlying touch-screen of computer C); a second waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : back panel 14 of waterproof housing 12) that houses the control module (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : a communication device which can have a second portion housed within the case 10), wherein the control module is configured to be operatively coupled to the electronic device (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] : a communication device is configured to be operatively coupled to the computer C); and a pressure balancing module (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36) coupled to the first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 are coupled to the front frame or panel 16 and side panels 18, 20), wherein the pressure balancing module is configured to balance pressure within the first waterproof enclosure relative to external ambient conditions (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0022], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 is configured to balance the pressure within the front frame or panel 16, and side panels 18, 20 relative to the external ambient conditions); wherein the first and second waterproof enclosures are physically coupled together (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] : front frame 16, and side panels 18,20 and back panel 14 are physically coupled together); and wherein an internal pressure of the first waterproof enclosure enables the non-rigid transparent membrane of the first waterproof enclosure to remain within a predetermined distance to the touchscreen of the electronic device, wherein the predetermined distance is one that allows the touchscreen of the electronic device to receive inputs from the user via the non-rigid transparent membrane (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0022], [0028], [0032] : gas cartridge 32, regulator 34, and pressure release valve 36 is configured to balance the pressure within the front frame or panel 16, and side panels 18, 20 relative to the external ambient conditions such that the shape of the membrane 28, and the location of the membrane 28 relative to the touch-screen of computer C is adjusted and optimized for use; the user can contact the membrane 28 to contact the underlying touch-screen of computer C). Brumen does not teach a modem; wherein the control module is operatively coupled to the modem. However, Farr teaches a modem (Fig. 14, [0128] : optical modem 1706 and acoustic modem 1722); wherein the control module is operatively coupled to the modem (Fig. 14, [0128] : diver computer 1710 is operatively coupled to the optical modem 1706 and acoustic modem 1722). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the modem as taught by Farr into Brumen’s underwater communication interface apparatus by modifying the first portion of the communication device to include the modems of the diver node. The suggestion / motivation for doing so would be to enable communication underwater that is high-speed and long-range (Abstract of Farr), and enable communication underwater that function in high-turbidity and poor-visibility conditions ([0121] of Farr) . Additionally, connecting an electronic device to a modem underwater is known as evidence by Brumen ([0035-0037]), and Cole (Fig. 1, [0045] of Cole). Regarding claim 16, Brumen as modified by Farr and Cole teaches the underwater communication interface apparatus of claim 15, wherein the modem is an optical modem configured to transmit and receive optical signals (Fig. 14, [0128] of Farr : optical modem 1706 includes receiver RX and transmitter TX). Regarding claim 17, Brumen as modified by Farr and Cole teaches the underwater communication interface apparatus of claim 15, wherein the modem is an acoustic modem configured to transmit and receive acoustic signals (Fig. 1-2, [0035-0038] of Brumen, and Fig. 14, [0128] of Farr : the communication device includes an acoustic hydrophone, and an acoustic transmitter, and acoustic modem 1722 includes acoustic transducer 1720). Regarding claim 18, Brumen as modified by Farr and Cole teaches the underwater communication interface apparatus of claim 15, wherein the first and second waterproof enclosures are physically coupled together (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] of Brumen : front frame 16, side panels 18,20, end panel 22, and cover 30, and back panel 14 are physically coupled together) and the second waterproof enclosure is secured to the rigid housing member of the first waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] of Brumen : back panel 14 is secured to the front frame 16, side panels 18,20, end panel 22, and cover 30). Claim(s) 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Berumen, Farr, and Cole combination as applied above, in view of Gorski et al. (US 20140037184 A1, and hereinafter “Gorski”). Regarding claim 19, Brumen as modified by Farr and Cole teaches the underwater communication interface apparatus of claim 18, wherein the rigid housing member of the first waterproof enclosure includes a transparent opening (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] of Brumen : front panel 14, side panels 18,20, end panel 22, and back panel 14 can be transparent) configured to be aligned with a camera of the electronic device (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] of Brumen : front panel 14, side panels 18,20, end panel 22, and back panel 14 can align with the computer C), wherein the transparent opening is unobscured by the second waterproof enclosure (Fig. 1-2, [0016-0019] of Brumen : front panel 14, side panels 18,20, end panel 22, and back panel 14 can be transparent). Brumen as modified by Farr and Cole does not teach a camera. However, Gorski teaches a camera (Fig. 2, [0065] : camera 210 can be disposed on the back side and front side of the mobile device 200) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the camera as taught by Gorski into Brumen, Farr, and Cole combination’s underwater communication interface apparatus by adding the cameras to the computer. The suggestion / motivation for doing so would be to provide the electronic device an ability to capture an image of an object ([0065] of Gorski). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEON KIM whose telephone number is (703)756-4580. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen L Parker can be reached on 303-297-4722. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALLEN L PARKER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2841 /KEON NMN KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602088
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604422
Separable Control Box Module
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593414
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12575040
STACKABLE MODULAR ELECTRONIC DEVICE SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560962
LAPTOP CASE WITH FOLDABLE SHADE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 67 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month