Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/293,107

Computational Photography Under Low-Light Conditions

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Examiner
BERHAN, AHMED A
Art Unit
2639
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
936 granted / 1071 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1101
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1071 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim [25] is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim recites, inter alia, "A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions that is ..." After close inspection, the Examiner respectfully notes that the disclosure, as a whole, does not specifically identify what may be included as a computer readable storage medium and what is not to be included as a computer readable storage medium. For example the current specification defines the computer readable storage medium broadly as a memory that is local and/or remote. In ¶0053. An Examiner is obliged to give claims their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification during examination. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim drawn to a computer readable medium (also called machine readable medium and other such variations) typically covers forms of non-transitory tangible media and transitory propagating signals per se in view of the ordinary and customary meaning of computer readable media, particularly when the specification is silent. See MPEP 2111.01. When the broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim covers a signal, per se, the claim must be rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as covering non-statutory subject matter. Therefore, given the silence of the disclosure and the broadest reasonable interpretation, the computer readable storage medium of the claim may include transitory propagating signals. As a result, the claim pertains to non-statutory subject matter. However, the Examiner respectfully submits a claim drawn to such a computer-readable medium that covers both transitory and non-transitory embodiments may be amended to narrow the claim to cover only statutory embodiments to avoid a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 by adding the limitation "non-transitory" to the claim. Such an amendment would typically not raise the issue of new matter, even when the specification is silent because the broadest reasonable interpretation relies on the ordinary and customary meaning that includes signals perse. For additional information, please see the Patents' Official Gazette notice published February 23, 2010 (1351 OG 212). Allowable Subject Matter Claims [1-3, 8-14 and 16-24] are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Reclaims [1 and 24] none of the prior art on the record either singularly or in combination teaches or reasonably suggests: A method comprising: determining, based on the received sensor data concerning the ambient conditions of the scene and using one or more image-capture devices of the mobile computing device, whether to (1) capture multiple images of the scene without use of a flash or (2) capture an image of the scene using the flash; responsive to determining to capture the multiple images of the scene without use of the flash, generating and providing a post-computational image using the multiple images of the scene; and responsive to determining to capture the image of the scene using the flash, generating and providing a flash-captured image; in conjunction with the other limitation of the claim. Claims [2-3, 8-14 and 16-23] are allowed due to their direct or indirect dependency on claim [1]. Examiner note: in order to resolve the above 35 USC § 101 issue by examiner’s amendment, examiner tried to reach applicant’s representative via a phone call on 01/30/2026. However, no response has been received. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED A BERHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5094. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00Am-5:00pm (MAX- Flex). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at 571-272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED A BERHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Dec 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604099
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604097
EXPOSURE CONVERGENCE METHOD AND RELATED IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604083
Recommendation Method of Video Recording Mode, Electronic Device, and Readable Storage Medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598857
IMAGING DEVICE INCLUDING AN ELECTRODE HAVING A TANTALUM NITRIDE LAYER AND ANOTHER LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598392
EFFICIENT PROCESSING OF IMAGE DATA FOR GENERATING COMPOSITE IMAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1071 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month