Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/293,163

TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Priority
Aug 05, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021029143
Examiner
SOROWAR, GOLAM
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
727 granted / 895 resolved
+19.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
940
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 895 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 7-11 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 7-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nilsson et al. (US 20240259950, hereinafter “Nilsson”), in view of Gao et al. (US 20230262608, hereinafter “Gao”), and further in view of Grossmann et al. (US 20230403108, hereinafter “Grossman”). Regarding claim 7, Nilsson discloses, A terminal comprising: a receiver that receives: configuration information regarding a list of uplink (UL) transmission configuration indication (TCI) states ([0052]-[0054: To facilitate UL beam selection for UEs equipped with multiple panels, a unified TCI framework for UL fast panel selection is to be evaluated and introduced in NR Rel-17. Similar to DL, where TCI states are used to indicate DL beams/TRPs, TCI states may also be used to select UL panels and beams used for UL transmissions (i.e., PUSCH, PUCCH, and SRS)..…[0071]: the information is comprised explicitly in a list or other data structure that provides mappings between the two or more power control states and the two or more TCI states and Fig. 13 and Fig. 14 explicit UL TCI state associations); a first set of transmission power control (TPC) parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) ([0030]-[0035]: describes PUSCH power control parameter…[[0162]: describes power control state IE per UL channel. Fig. 11 shows single IE covering all UL channels and Fig. 12 shows per UL channel power control state IE); a second set of TPC parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) ([0036]-[0037]: describes PUCCH power (P0, closed loop index)..[0168]: US applies PUCCH-specific power control state when triggered. Fig. 14 shows PUCCH spatial relation and Fig. 15 shows PUCCH configures points to power control state); and a third set of TPC parameters for a sounding reference signal ([0027]-[0029]: describes SRS power control parameters..[0168]-[0169]: SRS configuration IE pointing to power control state and Fig. 15 and Fig. shows SRS configuration IE), the first set, the second set, and the third set corresponding for each UL TCI state ID configured by the configuration information (above citations describes First set of TPC parameters for PUSCH; second set of TPC parameter for PUCCH and third set of TPC parameters for SRS); and a processor that controls PUCCH transmission power, based on the configuration information and the second set ([0054] describes UE performs UL transmission based on associations..[0074]-[0075] describes UE applies power control state for UL transmission..[0168]: when a UE is triggered with PUCCH transmission, the UE applies the power control parameters included in the power control state indicated in PUCCH Config IE (i.e., Power control state ID 2 in the example of FIG. 15).) However, Nilsson does not disclose, wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits. In the same field of endeavor, Gao discloses, wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH (each UL TCI state can be associated with a set of power control parameters. For a given UL TCI state, different sets of power control parameters may be associated to PUCCH, PUSCH, and SRS, [0165]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nisson by specifically providing wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH, as taught by Gao for the purpose of enabling more accurate per TRP power control with a simple signaling for multiple UL transmissions towards different TRPs scheduled by a single DCI (abstract). Further, the combination of Nilsson and Gao does not disclose, wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits. In the same field of endeavor, Grossman discloses, wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits (PUSCH(s) scheduled at least in the CC via a higher layer configured grant or a PUSCH scheduled at least in the CC via the DCI without an SRI field or a DCI that has an SRI field with 0 bits, [0291]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination of Nilsson and Gao by specifically providing wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits, as taught by Grossman for the purpose of providing techniques for signaling framework for flexible beam management in a wireless communications network such as advanced 5G networks [0095]. Regarding claim 8, the combination of Nilsson, Gao and Grossmann discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 7), further Nilsson discloses, wherein the first set (first set = PUSCH power control parameters, per claim dependency) includes: a parameter regarding P0; a parameter regarding α; and a parameter regarding a closed loop index ([0031]: “For dynamically scheduled PUSCH... a UE is configured by RRC with a list of P0-PUSCH-Alpha sets...” and “Each SRI-PUSCH-PowerControl IE consists of a ... closed-loop index, and a PO-PUSCH-AlphaSet...” [0030]-[0035]: PUSCH open-loop and closed-loop power control equations explicitly include: PO, α (fractional pathloss compensation factor) closed-loop index. FIG. 6; Illustrates PUSCH-specific power control configuration, including PO-PUSCH-Alpha sets and closed-loop index. ), and the second set (second set = PUCCH power control parameters) includes: a parameter regarding P0; and a parameter regarding a closed loop index ([0036]-[0037]: “For PUCCH, P0= P0,nominal_PUCCH + P0, UE_PUCCH and α= 1...”…. For closed loop power adjustment for PUCCH, up to two control loops may be configured.) [0068]-[0070]: the information comprises configuration of one or more identifiers of one or more power control states in the configuration is applicable to PUCCH and Fig. 4 shows PUCCH spatial relation IE including P0 selection and closed-loop index), and does not include a parameter regarding α (with respect to the second set/ PUCCH. The exclusion of α from PUCCH power control is explicitly supported: [0036): “For PUCCH... α = 1” This means: α is fixed, not configurable, and not included as a selectable parameter in the PUCCH power control set. In contrast: α is explicitly configurable for PUSCH via PO-PUSCH-Alpha sets see, [0031] and FIG. 6). Regarding claim 9, Nilsson discloses, A radio communication method for a terminal, comprising receiving: configuration information regarding a list of uplink (UL) transmission configuration indication (TCI) states ([0052]-[0054: To facilitate UL beam selection for UEs equipped with multiple panels, a unified TCI framework for UL fast panel selection is to be evaluated and introduced in NR Rel-17. Similar to DL, where TCI states are used to indicate DL beams/TRPs, TCI states may also be used to select UL panels and beams used for UL transmissions (i.e., PUSCH, PUCCH, and SRS)..…[0071]: the information is comprised explicitly in a list or other data structure that provides mappings between the two or more power control states and the two or more TCI states and Fig. 13 and Fig. 14 explicit UL TCI state associations); a first set of transmission power control (TPC) parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) ([0030]-[0035]: describes PUSCH power control parameter…[[0162]: describes power control state IE per UL channel. Fig. 11 shows single IE covering all UL channels and Fig. 12 shows per UL channel power control state IE); a second set of TPC parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) ([0036]-[0037]: describes PUCCH power (P0, closed loop index)..[0168]: US applies PUCCH-specific power control state when triggered. Fig. 14 shows PUCCH spatial relation and Fig. 15 shows PUCCH configures points to power control state); and a third set of TPC parameters for a sounding reference signal ([0027]-[0029]: describes SRS power control parameters..[0168]-[0169]: SRS configuration IE pointing to power control state and Fig. 15 and Fig. shows SRS configuration IE), the first set, the second set, and the third set corresponding for each UL TCI state ID configured by the configuration information (above citations describes First set of TPC parameters for PUSCH; second set of TPC parameter for PUCCH and third set of TPC parameters for SRS); and controlling PUCCH transmission power, based on the configuration information and the second set ([0054] describes UE performs UL transmission based on associations..[0074]-[0075] describes UE applies power control state for UL transmission..[0168]: when a UE is triggered with PUCCH transmission, the UE applies the power control parameters included in the power control state indicated in PUCCH Config IE (i.e., Power control state ID 2 in the example of FIG. 15).) However, Nilsson does not disclose, wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits. In the same field of endeavor, Gao discloses, wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH (each UL TCI state can be associated with a set of power control parameters. For a given UL TCI state, different sets of power control parameters may be associated to PUCCH, PUSCH, and SRS, [0165]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nisson by specifically providing wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH, as taught by Gao for the purpose of enabling more accurate per TRP power control with a simple signaling for multiple UL transmissions towards different TRPs scheduled by a single DCI (abstract). Further, the combination of Nilsson and Gao does not disclose, wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits. In the same field of endeavor, Grossman discloses, wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits (PUSCH(s) scheduled at least in the CC via a higher layer configured grant or a PUSCH scheduled at least in the CC via the DCI without an SRI field or a DCI that has an SRI field with 0 bits, [0291]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination of Nilsson and Gao by specifically providing wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits, as taught by Grossman for the purpose of providing techniques for signaling framework for flexible beam management in a wireless communications network such as advanced 5G networks [0095]. Regarding claim 10, Nilsson discloses, A base station comprising: a transmitter that transmits: configuration information regarding a list of uplink (UL) transmission configuration indication (TCI) states ([0052]-[0054: To facilitate UL beam selection for UEs equipped with multiple panels, a unified TCI framework for UL fast panel selection is to be evaluated and introduced in NR Rel-17. Similar to DL, where TCI states are used to indicate DL beams/TRPs, TCI states may also be used to select UL panels and beams used for UL transmissions (i.e., PUSCH, PUCCH, and SRS)..…[0071]: the information is comprised explicitly in a list or other data structure that provides mappings between the two or more power control states and the two or more TCI states and Fig. 13 and Fig. 14 explicit UL TCI state associations); a first set of transmission power control (TPC) parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) ([0030]-[0035]: describes PUSCH power control parameter…[[0162]: describes power control state IE per UL channel. Fig. 11 shows single IE covering all UL channels and Fig. 12 shows per UL channel power control state IE); a second set of TPC parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) ([0036]-[0037]: describes PUCCH power (P0, closed loop index)..[0168]: US applies PUCCH-specific power control state when triggered. Fig. 14 shows PUCCH spatial relation and Fig. 15 shows PUCCH configures points to power control state); and a third set of TPC parameters for a sounding reference signal ([0027]-[0029]: describes SRS power control parameters..[0168]-[0169]: SRS configuration IE pointing to power control state and Fig. 15 and Fig. shows SRS configuration IE), the first set, the second set, and the third set corresponding for each UL TCI state ID configured by the configuration information (above citations describes First set of TPC parameters for PUSCH; second set of TPC parameter for PUCCH and third set of TPC parameters for SRS); and a processor that indicates PUCCH transmission power, using on the configuration information and the second set ([0054] describes UE performs UL transmission based on associations..[0074]-[0075] describes UE applies power control state for UL transmission..[0168]: when a UE is triggered with PUCCH transmission, the UE applies the power control parameters included in the power control state indicated in PUCCH Config IE (i.e., Power control state ID 2 in the example of FIG. 15).) However, Nilsson does not disclose, wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits. In the same field of endeavor, Gao discloses, wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH (each UL TCI state can be associated with a set of power control parameters. For a given UL TCI state, different sets of power control parameters may be associated to PUCCH, PUSCH, and SRS, [0165]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nisson by specifically providing wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH, as taught by Gao for the purpose of enabling more accurate per TRP power control with a simple signaling for multiple UL transmissions towards different TRPs scheduled by a single DCI (abstract). Further, the combination of Nilsson and Gao does not disclose, wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits. In the same field of endeavor, Grossman discloses, wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits (PUSCH(s) scheduled at least in the CC via a higher layer configured grant or a PUSCH scheduled at least in the CC via the DCI without an SRI field or a DCI that has an SRI field with 0 bits, [0291]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination of Nilsson and Gao by specifically providing wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits, as taught by Grossman for the purpose of providing techniques for signaling framework for flexible beam management in a wireless communications network such as advanced 5G networks [0095]. Regarding claim 11, Nilsson discloses, A system comprising a base station and a terminal (FIG. 10 illustrates one example of a cellular communications system 1000), wherein the base station comprising: a transmitter that transmits: configuration information regarding a list of uplink (UL) transmission configuration indication (TCI) states ([0052]-[0054: To facilitate UL beam selection for UEs equipped with multiple panels, a unified TCI framework for UL fast panel selection is to be evaluated and introduced in NR Rel-17. Similar to DL, where TCI states are used to indicate DL beams/TRPs, TCI states may also be used to select UL panels and beams used for UL transmissions (i.e., PUSCH, PUCCH, and SRS)..…[0071]: the information is comprised explicitly in a list or other data structure that provides mappings between the two or more power control states and the two or more TCI states and Fig. 13 and Fig. 14 explicit UL TCI state associations); a first set of transmission power control (TPC) parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) ([0030]-[0035]: describes PUSCH power control parameter…[[0162]: describes power control state IE per UL channel. Fig. 11 shows single IE covering all UL channels and Fig. 12 shows per UL channel power control state IE); a second set of TPC parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) ([0036]-[0037]: describes PUCCH power (P0, closed loop index)..[0168]: US applies PUCCH-specific power control state when triggered. Fig. 14 shows PUCCH spatial relation and Fig. 15 shows PUCCH configures points to power control state); and a third set of TPC parameters for a sounding reference signal ([0027]-[0029]: describes SRS power control parameters..[0168]-[0169]: SRS configuration IE pointing to power control state and Fig. 15 and Fig. shows SRS configuration IE), the first set, the second set, and the third set corresponding for each UL TCI state ID configured by the configuration information (above citations describes First set of TPC parameters for PUSCH; second set of TPC parameter for PUCCH and third set of TPC parameters for SRS); and the terminal comprising: a receiver that receives: the configuration information ([0052]-[0054: To facilitate UL beam selection for UEs equipped with multiple panels, a unified TCI framework for UL fast panel selection is to be evaluated and introduced in NR Rel-17. Similar to DL, where TCI states are used to indicate DL beams/TRPs, TCI states may also be used to select UL panels and beams used for UL transmissions (i.e., PUSCH, PUCCH, and SRS)..…[0071]: the information is comprised explicitly in a list or other data structure that provides mappings between the two or more power control states and the two or more TCI states and Fig. 13 and Fig. 14 explicit UL TCI state associations); the first set, the second set, and the third set (above citations describes First set of TPC parameters for PUSCH; second set of TPC parameter for PUCCH and third set of TPC parameters for SRS); and a processor that controls PUCCH transmission power, based on the configuration information and the second set ([0054] describes UE performs UL transmission based on associations..[0074]-[0075] describes UE applies power control state for UL transmission..[0168]: when a UE is triggered with PUCCH transmission, the UE applies the power control parameters included in the power control state indicated in PUCCH Config IE (i.e., Power control state ID 2 in the example of FIG. 15).) However, Nilsson does not disclose, wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits. In the same field of endeavor, Gao discloses, wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH (each UL TCI state can be associated with a set of power control parameters. For a given UL TCI state, different sets of power control parameters may be associated to PUCCH, PUSCH, and SRS, [0165]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nisson by specifically providing wherein, when a UL TCI state for the PUSCH, as taught by Gao for the purpose of enabling more accurate per TRP power control with a simple signaling for multiple UL transmissions towards different TRPs scheduled by a single DCI (abstract). Further, the combination of Nilsson and Gao does not disclose, wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits. In the same field of endeavor, Grossman discloses, wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits (PUSCH(s) scheduled at least in the CC via a higher layer configured grant or a PUSCH scheduled at least in the CC via the DCI without an SRI field or a DCI that has an SRI field with 0 bits, [0291]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination of Nilsson and Gao by specifically providing wherein, when PUSCH is configured, a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field in a downlink control information format scheduling the PUSCH has a size of 0 bits, as taught by Grossman for the purpose of providing techniques for signaling framework for flexible beam management in a wireless communications network such as advanced 5G networks [0095]. Prior Art of the Record: The prior art made of record not relied upon and considered pertinent to Applicant’s disclosure: US 11902910: Methods and apparatuses for power control of multiple uplink transmissions. A method for operating a user equipment includes receiving information for first parameters and for second parameters, determining a first power for a first channel with a first spatial setting to a first reception point of a serving cell using the first parameters, and determining a second power for a second channel with a second spatial setting to a second reception point of the serving cell using the second parameters. US 20230254854: A wireless device may communicate with a base station by using overlapping transmissions. A transmission such as a power headroom report may be multiplexed in a repetition of a transmission such as a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission. A rule may be applied to indicate/determine a value/parameter associated with a transmission. For example, the rule may be used to indicate/determine a value of a power headroom report that may indicate a pathloss reference signal used to determine the power headroom report. US 20230141329: A method according to an embodiment of the present application may include: receiving a mapping pattern and a configuration of a plurality of power control parameter sets for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission, which is configured to be transmitted in a plurality of time intervals repeatedly; receiving a downlink control information (DCI) for scheduling the PUSCH transmission, wherein the DCI includes a sounding reference signal resource indicator (SRI) field. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GOLAM SOROWAR whose telephone number is (571)270-3761. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 8:30AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Appiah can be reached at (571) 272-7904. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GOLAM SOROWAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696199
UL POWER CONTROL FOR TRANSPORT BLOCK TRANSMISSION OVER MULTIPLE SLOTS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689109
COUPLER STRUCTURE AND RELATED RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUIT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683639
ANTENNA SWITCH FOR TIME DIVISION DUPLEXING AND FREQUENCY DIVISION DUPLEXING
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677226
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING RADIO FREQUENCY TRANSMIT POWER, ELECTRONIC CHIP, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12659693
Issuing Remote Commands to Tracking Devices
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 9m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 895 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month