Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/293,169

HORTICULTURE TRAY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Examiner
VALENTI, ANDREA M
Art Unit
3643
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Blackmore Company Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allow Rate
312 granted / 736 resolved
-9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +58% interview lift
Without
With
+58.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
779
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 736 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings were received on 29 July 2025. These drawings are unacceptable. The drawing entry Replacement Sheet Figures 1-8 contain new matter with a structural grid pattern present in the bottom aperture that was not present in the originally filed provisional and PCT applications. The added new matter is not supported by the original disclosure of the invention. In other words, a description of this new structure is not supported by the specification and introduces new matter. The new structural features need to be removed from the drawings and only drawings consistent with the original filing will be entered. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by United Kingdom Patent GB 2566797 to Christopher. Regarding Claim 1, Christopher teaches horticulture tray comprising a plurality of growing cells configured to hold a plant (Christopher Fig. 1 and 2 #10), each one of the plurality of growing cells includes spaced apart sidewalls (Christopher Fig. 1 and 2 #35) defining air gap openings (Christopher Fig. 1 and 2 #36) therebetween; wherein: the plurality of growing cells are arranged such that air gap openings of diagonally adjacent growing cells are aligned to provide direct line of sight between the diagonally adjacent growing cells; the plurality of growing cells are arranged such that sidewalls of vertically adjacent growing cells are aligned and face each other to block direct line of sight between the vertically adjacent growing cells to block root travel between the vertically adjacent growing cells; and the plurality of growing cells are arranged such that sidewalls of horizontally adjacent growing cells are aligned and face each other to block direct line of sight between the horizontally adjacent growing cells to block root travel between the horizontally adjacent growing cells (Christopher Fig. 2 shows the claimed alignments of elements #36 air gaps and #35 sidewalls, applicant doesn’t claim the size of the sidewall or how much of the area it blocks; top view of Fig. 2 shows the sidewalls are spaced from each other the width of top wall #20 between each cell); the air gap openings defined by the spaced apart sidewalls extend continuously and completely along an entire depth of the plurality of grow cells (Christopher Fig. 1 #36 starting from #32 top end of compartment; applicant doesn’t establish the location of the start point of the top of the cell) Regarding Claim 2, Christopher teaches the plurality of growing cells are arranged in rows and columns (Christopher Fig.1 and 2 #30). Regarding Claim 3, Christopher teaches the rows are aligned and the columns are aligned (Christopher Fig. 1 and 2). Regarding Claim 4, Christopher teaches the horticulture tray is rectangular (Christopher Fig. 1 and 2). Regarding Claim 5, Christopher teaches an outer wall (Christopher Fig. 1 and 2 #22) extending around a periphery of the horticulture tray. Regarding Claim 6, Christopher teaches each one of the plurality of growing cells includes a first aperture defined at a first end and a second aperture defined at a second end that is opposite to the first end (Christopher Fig. 1 and 2 #40 bottom and #32 top). Regarding Claim 7, Christopher teaches each one of the plurality of growing cells includes the sidewalls extend extending from the first aperture to the second aperture, the sidewalls are spaced apart to define air gaps therebetween (Christopher Fig. 1 and 2 #35 sidewalls go from #32 to #40 and gaps #36 therebetween). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-7 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The examiner maintains that applicant hasn’t patentably distinguished over the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREA M VALENTI whose telephone number is (571)272-6895. The examiner can normally be reached Available Monday and Tuesday only, eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Poon can be reached at 571-272-6891. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREA M VALENTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3643 10 March 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 28, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jan 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593760
TREE GUARD ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588657
Stock Tank Guard
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12550834
AUTONOMOUS WALL MOUNTED GARDEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550833
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING AND SUSTAINING A COOL MICROCLIMATE IN AN ARTIFICIAL VALLEY, AND USE OF STRUCTURE FOR VALORIZATION AND REMEDIATION OF BAUXITE RESIDUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12507646
AQUAPONICS SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+58.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 736 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month