Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/293,357

FERROPTOSIS MODULATORS, PREPARATIONS, AND USES THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Priority
Aug 09, 2021 — CN PCT/CN2021/111481 +1 more
Examiner
JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER LINDSAY
Art Unit
1691
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Sironax Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
15 granted / 29 resolved
-8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +78% interview lift
Without
With
+77.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
73
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 29 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the Applicant’s filing dated May 21st, 2026. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority This application is a 371 of PCT/CN2022/111129 filed on August 9th, 2022; and claims benefit of foreign priority of PCT/CN2021/111481 filed on August 9th, 2021. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Status of Claims Claims 1-12 are pending in the instant application. Acknowledgement is made of Applicant’s remarks filed on May 21st, 2026. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on May 21st, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 10 and 12 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on May 21st, 2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of Compound 545 shown below in the reply filed on May 21st, 2026 is acknowledged: PNG media_image1.png 357 501 media_image1.png Greyscale Which is a species of genus Formula (I) wherein L is cycloalkyl, specifically spiro[3.3]heptane; wherein X1 is N; wherein X2, X3, X4 and X5 are C; wherein m and n are 1; wherein Ra is substituted heterocyclyl, specifically 2,6-dimethylmorpholine; wherein Rb is H; wherein Rc is attached to the C atom of X5, and is unsubstituted alkyl, specifically ethyl; and wherein Rd is an unsubstituted heteroatom, specifically NH2. A prior art search was conducted for the elected species. This compound was found free of prior art. Therefore, the Examiner expanded search to encompass Compound 202 shown below: PNG media_image2.png 207 401 media_image2.png Greyscale Which is a species of genus Formula (I) wherein L is C; wherein X1, X2, X3, X4 and X5 are C; wherein m is 0; wherein n is 1; wherein Ra is an unsubstituted alkyl, specifically t-butyl; wherein Rb is H; and wherein Rd is a substituted alkyl, specifically C1-alkyl substituted by 1-pyrrolidine. This search retrieved prior art. Therefore, the Examiner’s search will not be extended unnecessarily to additional species of genus Formula (I) in/for/during this Office action. Claims 3 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on May 21st, 2026. Claims 1-2, 4-9 and 11 read on the elected species and will be examined herein. Claim Objections Claims 5, 7 and 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4, 6, 8 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cross et al (GB 1306450 A). Regarding claims 1-2, 4, 6, 8 and 11, Cross teaches N-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-pyrrolidinoethylamine shown below (page 6, lines 47-48): PNG media_image2.png 207 401 media_image2.png Greyscale which is a compound of Formula R1-NH-Y of Cross (page 2, right column, lines 105-108) wherein R1 is 4-alkyl-phenyl (e.g. t-butyl-phenyl; page 2, right column, lines 90-93); and wherein Y is -Alk-NR2R3, and Alk has 2 carbon atoms and R2 and R3 together with the N to which they are attached form a 4 carbon heterocycle (page 1, left column, lines 32-36, right column, lines 37-44). This is the compound expanded to by the examiner. Cross provides a synthetic method of production of the compound, and physical characterization consistent with possession (e.g. boiling point; page 6, lines 47-48). N-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-pyrrolidinoethylamine is a synonym for instantly claimed Compound 202. “When the reference relied on expressly anticipates or makes obvious all of the elements of the claimed invention, the reference is presumed to be operable. Once such a reference is found, the burden is on applicant to rebut the presumption of operability.” In re Sasse, 629 F.2d 675, 207 USPQ 107 (CCPA 1980), see MPEP § 2121(I). “In order to constitute anticipatory prior art, a reference must identically disclose the claimed compound, but no utility need be disclosed by the reference.” In re Schoenwald, 964 F.2d 1122, 1124, 22 USPQ2d 1671, 1673 (Fed. Cir. 1992), see MPEP § 2122; “The court found that the claim was anticipated since the compound and a process of making it were taught by the reference”. Thus, the teachings of Cross anticipate the compound of instant claims 1-2, 4, 6, 8 and 11. Conclusion Claims 1-2, 4, 6, 8 and 11 are rejected. Claims 5, 7 and 9 are objected to. No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER L JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1672. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 08:00AM - 5:00PM EST with Flex on Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Claytor can be reached on (571) 272-8394. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.L.J./Examiner, Art Unit 1691 /RENEE CLAYTOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691111
SETD2 INHIBITORS AND RELATED METHODS AND USES, INCLUDING COMBINATION THERAPIES
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686682
NEW INDAZOLE ACETYLENE DERIVATIVES
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12649745
AMINO-PYRIMIDINE CYCLO-AMIDES
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643862
NEW RYLENE DICARBOXIMIDES
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637426
1-CYANO-PYRROLIDINE COMPOUNDS AS USP30 INHIBITORS
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+77.8%)
3y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 29 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month