Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/293,404

ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND COUNTER CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, TRUC T
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Itschner Connect AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1112 granted / 1274 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1314
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§102
39.8%
-0.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1274 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 30-49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 30, the limitation “wherein the first and the second connector element include in each case” is unclear. The examiner interprets as “wherein each of the first and the second connector element include:” for examination. Claim 43, the limitation “wherein the counter connector elements include in each case:” is unclear. The examiner interprets as “wherein each of the counter connector elements include:” for examination. Claims 30, 42-43, and 47, the limitation “in particular” is indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 30-49 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record failed to teach the engagement step surface is formed at a transition from the connector element body to the insertion part and extending transverse to the connector element axis and outwards with respect to the connector element body. The prior art of record also failed to teach the first insertion part of the first electrical connector element and the second insertion part of the second electrical connector element are arranged on opposite sides with respect to a longitudinal connector axis. The prior art of record further failed to teach the biasing member being connected the first connector element body and the second connector element body and is configured to bias the first insertion part of the first electrical connector element and the second insertion part of the second electrical connector element towards each other, if the first and second connector element engagement direction are pointing towards each other, or, alternatively, to bias the first insertion part of the first electrical connector element and the second insertion part of the second electrical connector element away from each other if the first and second connector element engagement direction are pointing away from each other. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRUC T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2011. The examiner can normally be reached monday-friday (7-4). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M. Koehler can be reached at 5712723560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRUC T NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592523
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH IMPROVED GROUND SHIELDING EFFECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586952
CONNECTING ASSEMBLY AND RELATED ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580351
CABLE CAP WITH POWER INDICATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580342
CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580338
CONNECTOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1274 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month