Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/293,606

NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Priority
Aug 05, 2021 — JP 2021-128990 +1 more
Examiner
USYATINSKY, ALEXANDER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
740 granted / 893 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
924
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
81.0%
+41.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 893 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgement has been made of applicant’s claim for priority under 35 USC 119 (a-d). The certified copy has been filed on 07/31/2024. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statements (IDS) filed 01/30/2024 and 01/05/2026 have been placed in the application file and the information referred to therein has been considered. Drawings The drawings received 01/30/2024 are acceptable for examination purposes. Claims 3 and 5 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20170256788 to Uneyama (Uneyama). Regarding claim 3 and 5, Uneyama discloses a non-aqueous electrolyte secondary battery (Abstract) , comprising: a positive electrode; a negative electrode, a separator separating the positive electrode and the negative electrode from each other (claim 1, para 102) and a non-aqueous electrolyte (para 74), ), wherein the positive electrode has a positive electrode current collector ( 13A, Fig. 2) and a positive electrode mixture layer formed on a surface of the positive electrode current collector (Fig. 2), the positive electrode mixture layer includes a first positive electrode mixture layer (113) facing the positive electrode current collector and a second positive electrode mixture layer stacked on a surface of the first positive electrode mixture layer (213), at least the first positive electrode mixture layer contains a fibrous carbon (para 8), and the second positive electrode mixture layer does not contain the fibrous carbon (para 9, re claim 5). Since the second positive electrode mixture layer does not contain any fibrous conductive material, the limitation the second positive electrode mixture layer does not contain the fibrous carbon having an average fiber length of greater than or equal to a thickness of the second positive electrode mixture layer necessarily met. PNG media_image1.png 200 400 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20170256788 to Uneyama (Uneyama) in view of JP 2017010670 to So (So, machine translation). Regarding claims 1, Uneyama discloses a non-aqueous electrolyte secondary battery (Abstract) , comprising: a positive electrode; a negative electrode, a separator separating the positive electrode and the negative electrode from each other (claim 1, para 102) and a non-aqueous electrolyte (para 74), wherein the positive electrode has a positive electrode current collector ( 13A, Fig. 2) and a positive electrode mixture layer formed on a surface of the positive electrode current collector (Fig. 2), and the positive electrode mixture layer contains a fibrous carbon (para, 8, 48, claim 5) wherein the fibrous carbon is not exposed to a surface of the positive electrode mixture layer (Fig. 3). Uneyama does not expressly disclose wherein a fibrous carbon having a length of greater than or equal to 50% of a thickness of the positive electrode mixture layer. So teaches a cathode for a secondary battery, the cathode comprising cathode active substance and a fibrous carbon conductive material (Abstract). So also teaches that a ratio (L / T) of an average length (L) of the carbon material to a thickness (T) of the positive electrode active material layer is 1.4 or more (claim 1, reads on claimed on claimed 50% or more).In the case where the claimed ranges “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art” a case of obviousness exists where the claimed ranges and prior art ranges do not overlap but are close enough that one skilled in the art would have expected them to have the same properties. MPEP 2144.05.It would have been obvious to one or ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the positive electrode of Uneyama with the fibrous conductive material having ratio (L / T) of an average length (L) of the carbon material to a thickness (T) of the positive electrode active material layer is 1.4 or more as taught by So or wherein the length of greater than or equal to 50% or 90% (re claim 2) of a thickness of the positive electrode mixture layer, in order to prevent deterioration of the continuous discharge characteristics at a high discharge rate in the related art occurs because, when continuous discharge is performed at a high discharge rate (so, para 8). Regarding claim 4, Uneyama discloses the invention as discussed above as applied to claim 3, including a presence of fibrous carbon conductive material in the first positive electrode mixture layer (para 8). Uneyama does not expressly disclose wherein an average fiber length of the fibrous carbon contained in the first positive electrode mixture layer is greater than or equal to a thickness of the first positive electrode mixture layer. So teaches a cathode for a secondary battery, the cathode comprising cathode active substance and a fibrous carbon conductive material (Abstract). So also teaches that a ratio (L / T) of an average length (L) of the carbon material to a thickness (T) of the positive electrode active material layer is 1.4 or more (claim 1). Therefore the limitation an average fiber length of the fibrous carbon contained in the first positive electrode mixture layer is greater than or equal to a thickness of the first positive electrode mixture layer inherently met. It would have been obvious to one or ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the first positive electrode mixture layer of Uneyama with the fibrous conductive material having ratio (L / T) of an average length (L) of the carbon material to a thickness (T) of the positive electrode active material layer is 1.4 or more as taught by So in order to prevent deterioration of the continuous discharge characteristics at a high discharge rate in the related art occurs because, when continuous discharge is performed at a high discharge rate (so, para 8). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER USYATINSKY whose telephone number is (571)270-7703. The examiner can normally be reached IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Leong can be reached at (571) 270-1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Alexander Usyatinsky/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1751
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683175
REDOX FLOW BATTERY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING REDOX FLOW BATTERY
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676388
RECHARGEABLE BATTERY WITH MOVABLE ELECTRODE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676375
BATTERY CASE FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665261
CELL CONNECTOR FOR CONNECTING ROUND CELLS OF A BATTERY
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665265
APPARATUS FOR MAGNETIC FLUX GENERATION ON BUSBARS OF A RECONFIGURABLE BATTERY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.3%)
2y 9m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 893 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month