Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/293,623

TERMINAL AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, TU X
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NTT Docomo Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
763 granted / 899 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
924
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.1%
+7.1% vs TC avg
§102
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 899 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation is: “a control section” in claims 6, 9 and 10. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 6-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Huang (US Pub. 2022/0353873). Regrading claims 6 and 11, Huang discloses a terminal, comprising: a control section (par.0105 “a communications manager 1020”) that expects that a slot on which a first uplink control channel is transmitted on a first cell does not overlap with a slot on which a second uplink control channel is transmitted on a second cell in a case where dynamic switching is applied, wherein the dynamic switching switches a cell on which an uplink control channel is transmitted between the first cell and the second cell based on dynamic indication in downlink control information; and a transmission section (par.084 “the base station may configure….a first CC….. a second CC”, fig.3 elements 345, 350) that transmits the first uplink control channel on the first cell (par.082 “PUCCH 210 may be transmitted only on PCC 235….a PUCCH 210 carrier switch may provide that one or more of first SCC 235 or second SCC 240…..PUCCH 210 may be configured by the base station 105-a…..such as PDCCH 220”, par.085 “the first cc may transmit PUCCH transmission……..time domain……. In cases where PUCCH carrier switch 340 is configured, the first cc may be a PCC that transmits first PUCCH 345, and the second CC may be a SCC that is configured to transmit control information and that transmits second PUCCH 350”). Regrading claim 7, Huang discloses the first cell is a secondary cell (SCell) (par.082 “SCC 235”) and the second cell is a primary cell (PCell) or a primary secondary cell (PSCell) (par.082 “PCC 230”). Regrading claim 8, Huang discloses the first uplink control channel comprises a response signal to a downlink signal (par.082 “PUCCH…..may be configured by the base station….PDCCH”). Regrading claim 9, Huang discloses everything as claim 6 above. More specifically Huang discloses a base station (par.0137 “a communications manager 1420”, par.0161 “a transceiver 1725”, “a processor 1740”). Regrading claim 10, Huang discloses everything as claim 6 above. More specifically Huang discloses a terminal comprising a control section (par.0105 “a transmitter 1015”, “a communications manager 1020”, par. 0129 “a processor”), a base station comprising a reception (par.0137 “the receiver 1410”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Tu Nguyen whose telephone number is (571)272-7883. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-5PM Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TU X NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598551
USER EQUIPMENT, BASE STATION, AND METHODS THEREOF, READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581421
METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SENDING POWER OF AN UPLINK ELEMENT, AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574868
TRANSMIT POWER CONTROL CONFIGURATION FOR PHYSICAL UPLINK CONTROL CHANNEL REPETITION ACROSS MULTIPLE COMPONENT CARRIERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574857
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING SIGNAL POWER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557031
POWER CONTROL FOR UPLINK TRANSMISSIONS TOWARDS MULTIPLE TRPs
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+6.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 899 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month