Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/293,680

METHOD PERFORMED BY USER EQUIPMENT, AND USER EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner
ALAWDI, SHEHAB A
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
67%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
21 granted / 25 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -17% lift
Without
With
+-17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
63
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 25 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim [1-3 and 5] are rejected under 35 U.S.C 103 as being unpatentable over Sergey (US 20220109546 A1)] in view of Shin (US 20220210779 A1). Regrading claim 1 and 2 Sergey teaches receiving a physical layer channel carrying a conflict indication associated with the reserved resource. [0045] In a second embodiment, if a special signal is designed to announce the collisions, it could be transmitted once and be associated with the group ID and time instance of collision detection. If a TX UE knows there was a collision, the retransmission may be sent with RV0 instead on changing the RV (e.g. to RV2) that would increase self-decodability of the ReTX, a processor; [0156] Application circuitry 505 includes circuitry such as, but not limited to one or more processors (or processor cores), and a memory. [0156] application circuitry 505 may be coupled with or may include memory/storage elements and may be configured to execute instructions stored in the memory/storage Sergey does not teach transmitting Sidelink Control Information (SCI) format 1-A, the SCI format 1-A indicating a reserved resource in a resource pool. However, Shin does teach transmitting Sidelink Control Information (SCI) format 1-A, [0086] Subsequently, the transmission terminal 401 may transmit SCI (1.sup.st stage) to the reception terminal 402 through a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH) in 460. Also, the transmission terminal 401 may transmit SCI (2.sup.nd stage) to the reception terminal 402 through a PSSCH in 470, the SCI format 1-A indicating a reserved resource in a resource pool; [0086] 1.sup.st stage SCI may include information related to resource allocation, and 2.sup.nd stage SCI may include other control information. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having the teachings of Sergey and Shin before him or her, to modify the method of Sergey to include the SCI format as taught by Shin. The motivation to do so would be to the improved sidelink transmission efficiency. (0008 by Shin). In regards to claim 3, Sergey and Shin teach the limitations of the parent claim. Sergey also does teach report a resource conflict to a higher layer after detecting presence of the resource conflict based on the conflict indication. [0045] In a second embodiment, if a special signal is designed to announce the collisions, it could be transmitted once and be associated with the group ID and time instance of collision detection In regards to claim 5, Sergey and Shin teach the limitations of the parent claim. Sergey also does teach transmit a physical layer channel carrying a conflict indication associated with the reserved resource [0043] RX side collision indication. Another option to resolve half-duplex collisions in a group is to enable UE(s) which detect multiple simultaneous transmissions towards the same group ID to send NACK or to send a dedicated signal with collision announcement. Sergey does not teach receive Sidelink Control Information (SCI) format 1-A, the SCI format 1-A indicating a reserved resource in a resource pool. However, Shin does teach receive Sidelink Control Information (SCI) format 1-A, [0120] the transmission terminal may indicate, with 1 bit, PSSCH DMRS port information to another terminal via 1.sup.st stage SCI (SCI format 1-A) the SCI format 1-A indicating a reserved resource in a resource pool; [0063] FIG. 3 illustrates a resource pool defined as a set of resources on time and frequency used for sidelink transmission and reception according to an embodiment. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having the teachings of Sergey and Shin before him or her, to modify the method of Sergey to include the SCI format as taught by Shin. The motivation to do so would be to the improved sidelink transmission efficiency. (0008 by Shin). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but could be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Sergey and Shin teach the limitation of the parent claim. All the references combined do not teach, “wherein the SCI format 1-A is transmitted in a first slot, the physical layer channel is received in a second slot, resources for physical layer channel transmissions carrying conflict indications periodically occur in the resource pool, the instructions, when run by the processor, further cause the UE to determine, as the second slot, the first number being indicated by a pre-defined value depending on a sub-carrier spacing, and the conflict indication is received in the second slot on condition that the second slot is at least second number of slots after the first slot”. However, reference US 20210084462 A1 Hwang, teaches “the reserved resource is in a third slot” [0127] For example, in a slot related to a resource pool, a PSFCH resource may be configured periodically as N slot durations, or may be pre-configured. For example, N may be configured as one or more values greater than or equal to 1, “a last slot configured with the resources which is at least first number of slots before the third slot” [0183] For example, in the embodiment of FIG. 17, a timing gap for a PSCCH/PSSCH transmitted in slot #1 may be six slots, a timing gap for a PSCCH/PSSCH transmitted in slot #3 may be four slots, a timing gap for a PSCCH/PSSCH transmitted in slot #4 may be three slots, and a timing gap for a PSCCH/PSSCH transmitted in slot #5 may be two slots. “the second number being indicated by a configured or preconfigured value” [0125] For example, in case of the resource allocation mode 1, a time (offset) between the PSFCH and the PSSCH may be configured or pre-configured. In case of unicast and groupcast, if retransmission is necessary on SL, this may be indicated to a BS by an in-coverage UE which uses the PUCCH. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEHAB A ALAWDI whose telephone number is (571)270-3203. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, [ Hamza, Faruk ] can be reached at [ (571) 272-7969 ]. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEHAB A ALAWDI/Examiner, Art Unit 2466 /JAY P PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593324
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COORDINATING DATA TRANSMISSION IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587307
METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR DETERMINING PARAMETERS OF BURSTS FOR DATA FLOW TRANSMISSION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK BASED ON CHANNEL QUALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581330
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580680
INTERLEAVER DESIGN FOR NONCOHERENT REED MULLER CODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581435
METHOD FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION IN NR V2X BY TERMINAL IN WHICH NR MODULE AND LTE MODULE COEXIST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
67%
With Interview (-17.4%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 25 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month