Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/293,788

AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEM AND AEROSOL-GENERATING DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jan 31, 2024
Priority
Aug 02, 2021 — CN 202110881136.8 +1 more
Examiner
MCKANE, ELIZABETH L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shenzhen First Union Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
146 granted / 232 resolved
+2.9% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 232 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Final Rejection Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2021/0112878 to Ruscio et al. (hereinafter Ruscio). PNG media_image1.png 876 638 media_image1.png Greyscale Ruscio discloses an aerosol-generation device 102, configured to heat an aerosol-generating product (para [0038]) to generate an aerosol, comprising: a receiving cavity 106, configured to receive the aerosol-generating product; a heater 130, at least partially extending in the receiving cavity, to heat the aerosol- generating product, wherein the heater has a free front end configured to be inserted into the aerosol-generating product; and a window 118, at least partially surrounding the heater and avoiding the free front end, wherein at least a part of the heater facing away from the free front end is visible through the window. See Figures 2 and 4, illustrating that the location of the window 118 exposed the heater when member 11 is withdrawn. Claim(s) 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 211048399 to Xu et al. (hereinafter Xu). Xu teaches an aerosol generating device including a receiving cavity 23, configured to receive the aerosol-generating product A; a heater 30, at least partially extending in the receiving cavity, to heat the aerosol-generating product, wherein the heater has a free front end configured to be inserted into the aerosol-generating product; and a window 12, at least partially surrounding the heater and avoiding the free front end (the heater is spaced from the window), wherein at least a part of the heater facing away from the free front end is visible through the window. PNG media_image2.png 598 304 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 819 414 media_image3.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3, 9, 15, 18, 21, 22, 24-31 and 33 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4 June 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. While applicant amended independent claims 1 and 33 to incorporate previously indicated allowable subject matter, independent claim 32 has not been amended. Thus, the rejection thereof is maintained. The Examiner attempted to contact applicant’s representative by phone on 1 July and by email on 7 July in order to get permission to amend claim 32 by examiner’s amendment, but was unsuccessful. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIZABETH L MCKANE whose telephone number is (571)272-1275. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 6:30a-4:30p EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patricia Engle can be reached at 571-272-6660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELIZABETH L MCKANE/Specialist, Art Unit 3991
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2024
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 04, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent RE50975
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent RE50963
AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEM WITH PUFF DETECTOR
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12685335
METHOD OF GENERATING AEROSOL USING ULTRASONIC VIBRATOR AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PERFORMING THE METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12660856
TUBULAR HEATING BODY AND AEROSOL-GENERATING APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent RE50896
APPARATUS FOR TESTING A LIQUID SPECIMEN
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+26.0%)
3y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 232 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month