Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/293,815

CONTROL METHODS, COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND PROGRAMS

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Jan 31, 2024
Examiner
SHAHEED, KHALID W
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NTT, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
694 granted / 840 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
881
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 840 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim 7, is directed to a “A program”. A program is considered non-statutory subject matter as it is not a useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof. A program must also be stored on a non-transitory medium. In the instant application, Applicant’s originally filed specification on [0067] discloses “The program described above may be recorded on a computer-readable recording medium” with various examples provided. Here, the term ‘may’ is indefinite. Furthermore, the OG Notice (1351 OG 212) published on February 23, 2010 says: The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim drawn to a computer readable medium (also called machine readable medium and other such variations) typically covers forms of non-transitory tangible media and transitory propagating signals per se in view of the ordinary and customary meaning of computer readable media… Hence, claim 7 is directed to non-statutory subject matter, since the broadest reasonable interpretation of a “computer-readable medium” as defined by Applicant’s originally filed specification above and in view of the OG Notice above, is directed to a “signal”, and a “signal” ” per se does not fall within any of the four statutory classes of 35 U.S.C. §101. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Jung (US 2014/0004869 A1)(From Information Disclosure Statement). Regarding claims 1, 6-7, Jung discloses a control method of a communication device, communication device and program for causing a computer to function as a communication device comprising: the program causing the computer to function as: acquiring a first coverage indicating a range in which the communication device and a terminal can communicate with each other (see central region , [0051]), and a second coverage indicating a range in which the communication device provides a communication service (see boundary region, [0051]); and deriving a beam width communicable (see “dynamically adjusts the beam width”) in the second coverage on the basis of the first coverage and the second coverage acquired (based on target region where mobile is positioned and boundary coverage [0051]). Regarding claim 2, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 1, wherein the first coverage is acquired on the basis of a line design between the communication device and the terminal or a distance between the communication device and the terminal (see [0050], “distance between the position of the transmission target region where a transmission beam”). Regarding claim 3, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 1, wherein the second coverage from a host device is acquired (see [0072], it is determined that when the position of the target region to which the DL SCHs and DL BCHs are transmitted is in the boundary region side, it is determined that relatively narrow transmission beams as compared to the transmission beams transmitted to the central region side are used.). Regarding claim 4, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 1, wherein the first coverage is determined by a first distance at which the communication device and the terminal can communicate with each other (see fig. 3, see first distance, 42 m), the second coverage is determined by a second distance (see boundary distance 198m, fig. 3), and the beam width is derived in accordance with a distance difference between the first distance and the second distance (see, [0050], as the distance between the position of the transmission target region where a transmission beam for transmitting DL SCH and DL BCH and the base station transmitter is increased, the beam width of the transmission beam for transmitting the DL SCH and DL BCH is narrowed). Regarding claim 5, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 1, further comprising performing beam sweeping with the beam width derived (see beam sweep [0042]). Regarding claim 8, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 2, wherein the first coverage is determined by a first distance at which the communication device and the terminal can communicate with each other (see fig. 3, see first distance, 42 m), the second coverage is determined by a second distance (see boundary distance 198m, fig. 3), and the beam width is derived in accordance with a distance difference between the first distance and the second distance (see [0050], “as the distance between the position of the transmission target region where a transmission beam for transmitting DL SCH and DL BCH and the base station transmitter is increased, the beam width of the transmission beam for transmitting the DL SCH and DL BCH is narrowed”). Regarding claim 9, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 3, wherein the first coverage is determined by a first distance at which the communication device and the terminal can communicate with each other (see fig. 3, see first distance, 42 m), the second coverage is determined by a second distance (see boundary distance 198m, fig. 3), and the beam width is derived in accordance with a distance difference between the first distance and the second distance (see [0050], “as the distance between the position of the transmission target region where a transmission beam for transmitting DL SCH and DL BCH and the base station transmitter is increased, the beam width of the transmission beam for transmitting the DL SCH and DL BCH is narrowed”). Regarding claim 10, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 2, further comprising performing beam sweeping with the beam width derived (see beam sweeping, [0032]). Regarding claim 11, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 3, further comprising performing beam sweeping with the beam width derived (see beam sweeping, [0032]). Regarding claim 12, Jung discloses the control method according to claim 4, further comprising performing beam sweeping with the beam width derived (see beam sweeping, [0032]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-10863474-B2 US-20180115958-A1 US-20180302136-A1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to K. WILFORD SHAHEED whose telephone number is (469) 295-9175. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9 am-6pm; CST; ALT Friday. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The examiner’s Supervisor, Jinsong Hu, can be reached at (571)272-3965, where attempts to reach the examiner are unsuccessful. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHALID W SHAHEED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587228
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR A NETWORK DEVICE TRANSCEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581450
Wireless Communications Method and Related Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574792
PREDICTIVE TRANSMISSION RATE ADAPTATION IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574453
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD FOR PERFORMING COMMUNICATION CONNECTION WITH PERIPHERAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574775
EARLY MEASUREMENT REPORTING VERIFICATION FOR NON-CONNECTED MODE USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 840 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month