Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/293,900

PROCESSING METHOD FOR REMOTE USER EQUIPMENT, AND USER EQUIPMENT

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 31, 2024
Priority
Aug 04, 2021 — CN 202110894141.2 +1 more
Examiner
VAN ROIE, JUSTIN T
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
306 granted / 369 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
411
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 369 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Examiner’s Comment The examiner attempted to contact Fei-Hung Yang (Reg. #77,188) 16 September 2026 – 25 September 2026 in an attempt to facilitate compact prosecution. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 6, filed 27 June 2026, in view of the amendments with respect to the title have been fully considered and are persuasive. The objection of the specification has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see pages 6-7, filed 27 June 2026, in view of the amendments with respect to claims 1 and 10-13 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The double patenting rejections of the claims have been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see pages 8-11, filed 27 June 2026, in view of the amendments with respect to claims 1 and 10-13 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 103 rejection of the claims has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 12 is directed to “A relay user equipment” as recited in line 1. However, lines 9-17 are directed to an operation performed by “a relay user equipment”. Therefore, the scope of the claim is unclear. For examining purposes, the examiner will interpret the claim as best understood. Claim 13 is also rejected since it is dependent upon rejected claim 12 as set forth above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN T VAN ROIE whose telephone number is (571)270-0308. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ian N Moore can be reached at 571-272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN T VAN ROIE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 26, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772189
REAL-TIME GPS MEASUREMENT LAG COMPENSATION FOR VEHICLE STATE ESTIMATES
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763899
Reference Point Selection for OTDOA in a Non-Terrestrial Network
4y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764822
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SYSTEM INFORMATION DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750186
Sounding Reference Signal Transmission Optimization
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745095
DYNAMIC RADIO ACCESS TECHNOLOGY BANDWIDTH ADAPTATION ACROSS ASYMMETRIC DSS NETWORKS
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.5%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 369 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month