Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/293,923

INTEGRATED PROCESS FOR 5-(METHOXYCARBONYL)FURAN-2-CARBOXYLIC ACID (MCFC)

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 31, 2024
Priority
Aug 04, 2021 — provisional 63/203,897 +3 more
Examiner
AULAKH, CHARANJIT
Art Unit
1621
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Eastman Chemical Company
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1441 granted / 1787 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -14% lift
Without
With
+-14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
1817
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1787 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . According to paper filed on July 30, 2026, the applicants have amended claims 1 and 2. Claims 1-20 are pending in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed July 30, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive regarding obviousness rejection. The applicants have amended claims to overcome indefiniteness rejection and furthermore, have filed terminal disclaimer to overcome all ODP and provisional ODP rejections. Regarding obviousness rejection, the applicants argue on page 8 that the cited reference does not teach recycling and reusing the solvent. The examiner does not agree with this argument. The applicant’s attention is drawn to page 4, paragraph [0053] and page 6, paragraph [0084] where it clearly states that the solvent and catalyst used in the process may be recycled and reused. Therefore, unless applicants provide unexpected results of superior yield etc. of the instant process over the process of the cited reference, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to recycle and reuse the solvent in the process of the cited reference with reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion The obviousness rejection of claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C 103(a) over US2019/0389846 A1 is maintained. NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In independent claim 1, the value of variable R3 is defined twice, first as alkyl having 1-6 carbon atoms and also as alkyl having 1-3 carbon atoms. Therefore, it is not clear what is the actual value of this variable? Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARANJIT AULAKH whose telephone number is (571)272-0678. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton A Brooks can be reached at 571-270-7682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARANJIT AULAKH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 30, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747234
KINASE INHIBITORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747263
ORALLY ACTIVE LEUKEMIA INHIBITORY FACTOR (LIF) ANTAGONISTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741948
BENZOTHIAZOLE AND QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740987
SOLUBLE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SALTS OF DISUBSTITUTED 1, 2, 4-TRIAZINE COMPOUND
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735421
PLASMIN INHIBITOR, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND APPLICATION THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-14.5%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1787 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month