Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/294,127

SWITCHING CONFIGURATIONS FOR UPLINK TRANSMISSION SWITCHING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 31, 2024
Examiner
JENSEN, NICHOLAS A
Art Unit
2472
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
81 granted / 148 resolved
-3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +58% interview lift
Without
With
+57.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 6m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
157
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 148 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The 1/31/2024 amendment to paragraph [0001] of the specification has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by RICO ALVARINO et al. (US PG Pub. 2017/0332370 A1) hereinafter Rico Alvarino. Regarding claim 1, Rico Alvarino discloses: A method of wireless communication performed by a user equipment (UE), comprising: receiving, from a network entity, (¶112-113 and Fig. 16 and 17 – UE receives indication from BS) a switching configuration for an uplink transmission switching for three or more carriers, wherein the switching configuration is associated with: switching one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE from one or more carriers of the three or more carriers within a time period, or switching the one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE to the one or more carriers of the three or more carriers within the time period; and switching the one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE associated with the switching configuration for the uplink transmission switching. (¶0089–¶0096; ¶0108–¶0113; Figs. 11–13 — Describes UE interrupting a first CC to switch to a second CC for SRS, timing/retuning, and adjusting uplink parameters, up to 32 carriers are supported, Fig. 9 and 10 shows three carriers; switching behavior and configuration context across multiple carriers (CA) are covered.) Regarding claim 2, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 1, wherein the switching configuration permits switching from one carrier within the time period. (¶0096; Fig. 12 — Shows switching from a current carrier to another within a defined symbol/slot period (puncturing several symbols due to a 2-symbol retuning)). Regarding claim 3, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 1, wherein the switching configuration permits switching to one carrier within the time period. (¶0092–¶0096; Fig. 12 — UE switches “to” a second CC (for SRS) within a time window and then back, illustrating permitted switch-to operations.) Regarding claim 4, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 1, wherein the time period is one slot or a quantity of consecutive symbols. (¶0096–¶0098; ¶0102–¶0103; Fig. 12 — Explicit examples of retuning times in symbols (e.g., 2 symbols) and slot-level durations; puncturing is shown at symbol granularity.) Regarding claim 5, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 1, wherein the three or more carriers include three carriers associated with three bands, respectively, or the three or more carriers include three non-contiguous carriers associated with less than three bands. (¶0091–¶0094; Figs. 9–10 — Discusses contiguous vs. non-contiguous CA and inter-band scenarios; supports multi-band and non-contiguous carrier cases. Fig. 9 and 10 shows three carriers.) Regarding claim 6, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting, to the network entity, capability signaling indicating that the UE is capable of switching from two carriers within the time period, or that the UE is capable of switching to the two carriers within the time period. (¶0109–¶0114; Figs. 16–17 — UE receives a query and provides switching capability indication (including supported carriers and switching times) to the BS, an example is provided about switching two carriers.) Regarding claim 7, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 6, wherein the switching configuration permits switching from two carriers within the time period associated with the capability signaling. (¶0109–¶0114; Fig. 16 — BS queries capability and configures switching consistent with UE-reported capabilities for specific CA configurations.) Regarding claim 8, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 6, wherein the switching configuration permits switching to two carriers within the time period associated with the capability signaling. (¶0109–¶0114; Fig. 17 — Same capability-driven configuration applies to switching-to relationships/times.) Regarding claim 9, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 1, wherein one carrier of the three or more carriers is associated with one uplink transmission chain prior to the uplink transmission switching and after the uplink transmission switching. (¶0089–¶0096; ¶0111–¶0113 — UE interrupts a first CC, switches for SRS on another CC, then resumes uplink on the original CC, implying the same chain/carrier association before and after.) Regarding claim 10, Rico Alvarino discloses: A method of wireless communication performed by a network entity, comprising: transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), (¶112-113 and Fig. 16 and 17 – UE receives indication from BS) a switching configuration for an uplink transmission switching at the UE for three or more carriers, wherein the switching configuration is associated with: switching one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE from one or more carriers of the three or more carriers within a time period, or switching the one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE to the one or more carriers of the three or more carriers within the time period; and receiving, from the UE, an uplink transmission associated with the switching configuration for the uplink transmission switching. (¶0089–¶0096; ¶0108–¶0113; Figs. 11–13 — Describes UE interrupting a first CC to switch to a second CC for SRS, timing/retuning, and adjusting uplink parameters, up to 32 carriers are supported, Fig. 9 and 10 shows three carriers; switching behavior and configuration context across multiple carriers (CA) are covered.) Regarding claim 11, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 10, wherein: the switching configuration permits switching from one carrier within the time period; (¶0096; Fig. 12 — Shows switching from a current carrier to another within a defined symbol/slot period (puncturing several symbols due to a 2-symbol retuning)) or the switching configuration permits switching to one carrier within the time period. (¶0092–¶0096; Fig. 12 — UE switches “to” a second CC (for SRS) within a time window and then back, illustrating permitted switch-to operations.) Regarding claim 12, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 10, wherein the time period is one slot or a quantity of consecutive symbols. (¶0096–¶0098; ¶0102–¶0103; Fig. 12 — Explicit examples of retuning times in symbols (e.g., 2 symbols) and slot-level durations; puncturing is shown at symbol granularity.) Regarding claim 13, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 10, further comprising: receiving, from the UE, capability signaling indicating that the UE is capable of switching from two carriers within the time period, or that the UE is capable of switching to the two carriers within the time period. (¶0109–¶0114; Figs. 16–17 — BS receives UE capability signaling (supported carrier pairs and switching times) for one or more CA configurations.) Regarding claim 14, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 13, wherein: the switching configuration permits switching from two carriers within the time period associated with the capability signaling; or the switching configuration permits switching to two carriers within the time period associated with the capability signaling. (¶0109–¶0114; Figs. 16–17 — UE receives a query and provides switching capability indication (including supported carriers and switching times) to the BS, an example is provided about switching two carriers.) Regarding claim 15, Rico Alvarino discloses: The method of claim 10, wherein one carrier of the three or more carriers is associated with one uplink transmission chain prior to the uplink transmission switching and after the uplink transmission switching. (¶0089–¶0096; ¶0111–¶0113 — UE interrupts a first CC, switches for SRS on another CC, then resumes uplink on the original CC, implying the same chain/carrier association before and after.) Regarding claim 16, Rico Alvarino discloses: An apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: a first interface configured to receive, from a network entity, (¶112-113 and Fig. 16 and 17 – UE receives indication from BS) a switching configuration for an uplink transmission switching at the UE for three or more carriers, wherein the switching configuration is associated with: switching one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE from one or more carriers of the three or more carriers within a time period, or switching the one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE to the one or more carriers of the three or more carriers within the time period; and a processing system configured to switch the one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE associated with the switching configuration for the uplink transmission switching. (¶0089–¶0096; ¶0108–¶0113; Figs. 11–13 — Describes UE interrupting a first CC to switch to a second CC for SRS, timing/retuning, and adjusting uplink parameters, up to 32 carriers are supported, Fig. 9 and 10 shows three carriers; switching behavior and configuration context across multiple carriers (CA) are covered.) Regarding claim 17, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the switching configuration permits switching from one carrier within the time period. (¶0096; Fig. 12 — Shows switching from a current carrier to another within a defined symbol/slot period (puncturing several symbols due to a 2-symbol retuning)). Regarding claim 18, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the switching configuration permits switching to one carrier within the time period. (¶0092–¶0096; Fig. 12 — UE switches “to” a second CC (for SRS) within a time window and then back, illustrating permitted switch-to operations.) Regarding claim 19, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the time period is one slot or a quantity of consecutive symbols. (¶0096–¶0098; ¶0102–¶0103; Fig. 12 — Explicit examples of retuning times in symbols (e.g., 2 symbols) and slot-level durations; puncturing is shown at symbol granularity.) Regarding claim 20, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the three or more carriers include three carriers associated with three bands, respectively, or the three or more carriers include three non-contiguous carriers associated with less than three bands. (¶0091–¶0094; Figs. 9–10 — Discusses contiguous vs. non-contiguous CA and inter-band scenarios; supports multi-band and non-contiguous carrier cases. Fig. 9 and 10 shows three carriers.) Regarding claim 21, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the first interface or a second interface is configured to: output, to the network entity, capability signaling indicating that the UE is capable of switching from two carriers within the time period, or that the UE is capable of switching to the two carriers within the time period. (¶0109–¶0114; Figs. 16–17 — UE receives a query and provides switching capability indication (including supported carriers and switching times) to the BS, an example is provided about switching two carriers.) Regarding claim 22, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the switching configuration permits switching from two carriers within the time period associated with the capability signaling. (¶0109–¶0114; Fig. 16 — BS queries capability and configures switching consistent with UE-reported capabilities for specific CA configurations.) Regarding claim 23, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the switching configuration permits switching to two carriers within the time period associated with the capability signaling. (¶0109–¶0114; Fig. 17 — Same capability-driven configuration applies to switching-to relationships/times.) Regarding claim 24, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 16, wherein one carrier of the three or more carriers is associated with one uplink transmission chain prior to the uplink transmission switching and after the uplink transmission switching. (¶0089–¶0096; ¶0111–¶0113 — UE interrupts a first CC, switches for SRS on another CC, then resumes uplink on the original CC, implying the same chain/carrier association before and after.) Regarding claim 25, Rico Alvarino discloses: An apparatus for wireless communication at a network entity, comprising: a first interface configured to output, to a user equipment (UE), (¶112-113 and Fig. 16 and 17 – UE receives indication from BS) a switching configuration for an uplink transmission switching at the UE for three or more carriers, wherein the switching configuration is associated with: switching one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE from one or more carriers of the three or more carriers within a time period, or switching the one or more uplink transmission chains of the UE to the one or more carriers of the three or more carriers within the time period; and the first interface or a second interface configured to obtain, from the UE, an uplink transmission associated with the switching configuration for the uplink transmission switching. (¶0089–¶0096; ¶0108–¶0113; Figs. 11–13 — Describes UE interrupting a first CC to switch to a second CC for SRS, timing/retuning, and adjusting uplink parameters, up to 32 carriers are supported, Fig. 9 and 10 shows three carriers; switching behavior and configuration context across multiple carriers (CA) are covered.) Regarding claim 26, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 25, wherein: the switching configuration permits switching from one carrier within the time period; or the switching configuration permits switching to one carrier within the time period. Regarding claim 27, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the time period is one slot or a quantity of consecutive symbols. (¶0096–¶0098; ¶0102–¶0103; Fig. 12 — Explicit examples of retuning times in symbols (e.g., 2 symbols) and slot-level durations; puncturing is shown at symbol granularity.) Regarding claim 28, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the first interface or the second interface is further configured to: obtain, from the UE, capability signaling indicating that the UE is capable of switching from two carriers within the time period, or that the UE is capable of switching to the two carriers within the time period. (¶0109–¶0114; Figs. 16–17 — UE receives a query and provides switching capability indication (including supported carriers and switching times) to the BS, an example is provided about switching two carriers.) Regarding claim 29, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 28, wherein: the switching configuration permits switching from two carriers within the time period associated with the capability signaling; (¶0109–¶0114; Fig. 16 — BS queries capability and configures switching consistent with UE-reported capabilities for specific CA configurations.) or the switching configuration permits switching to two carriers within the time period associated with the capability signaling. (¶0109–¶0114; Fig. 17 — Same capability-driven configuration applies to switching-to relationships/times.) Regarding claim 30, Rico Alvarino discloses: The apparatus of claim 25, wherein one carrier of the three or more carriers is associated with one uplink transmission chain prior to the uplink transmission switching and after the uplink transmission switching. (¶0089–¶0096; ¶0111–¶0113 — UE interrupts a first CC, switches for SRS on another CC, then resumes uplink on the original CC, implying the same chain/carrier association before and after.) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20210306916A1- Transmission chain switching across carriers; switching duration; multiple carriers US 20170290015A1 - Uplink primary carrier switching; capability signaling; network configuration US 10721734B2 - version of Rank 2; validated uplink carrier switching US 10455558B2 Carrier switching capability information; switching time details US 20170332370A1 - UE-side switching capability framework US 10993213B2 - Explicitly supports K≥3 carriers; asymmetric uplink CA control US 20170171848A1 - Secondary carrier configuration; multiple carrier control US 20200336892A1 - CA capability signaling for separate operations on multiple CCs US 10880913B2 - RRC signaling for uplink carrier configuration US 9119211B2 - RF chain management; carrier deactivation/switching Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nicholas Jensen whose telephone number is (571)270-5443. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. NICHOLAS JENSEN Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 2472 /NICHOLAS A JENSEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2472
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 9111268
NULL
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2015
Patent 9059826
NULL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2015
Patent 9053069
NULL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2015
Patent 9036622
Media negotiation method for IP multimedia link
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2015
Patent 9032046
Method for performing a dynamic update of composed web services
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2015
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+57.7%)
5y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 148 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month