DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Drawings
The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the Spring, Hook, and Groove must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered.
Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-4, 22, and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Malandain (FR 3087584 A1)(English Translated).
In Regards to Claim 1:
Malandain teaches a charging socket (Fig. 1) comprising:
a device fixed (36) to a vehicle body; and a current connector (14) and a detachable mechanism (See Reproduced Drawing 1), wherein the current connector (14) is connected to an electrical connection device (20) and a cable (12), and wherein the current connector (14) is detachably fixed by the detachable mechanism (See Reproduced Drawing 1) to the device fixed (36) to the vehicle body.
In Regards to Claim 2:
Malandain teaches the charging socket according to claim 1, wherein the current connector (14) is provided with a mounting portion (26), and the device fixed (36) to the vehicle body is provided with a mounting hole (See Reproduced Drawing 1), and the mounting portion (26) is inserted into the mounting hole (See Reproduced Drawing 1) and detachably connected.
In Regards to Claim 3:
Malandain teaches the charging socket according to claim 2, wherein the mounting portion (26) comprises an arc wall and a planar wall adapted to an inner wall of the mounting hole (See Reproduced Drawing 1).
In Regards to Claim 4:
Malandain teaches the charging socket according to claim 1, wherein the current connector (14) is disposed at a rear end of the device fixed (36) to the vehicle body, and wherein the electrical connection device (20) is disposed at a front end of the device fixed (36) to the vehicle body and is connected to the current connector (14).
In Regards to Claim 22:
Malandain teaches the charging socket according to claim 1, wherein the cable (12) is detachably connected to the electrical connection device (20).
In Regards to Claim 28:
Malandain teaches a vehicle comprising the charging socket (Fig. 1) according to claim 1.
PNG
media_image1.png
581
804
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 5-14, 16-18, and 25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
The prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest these limitation as substantially described in claims 5-18 and 25, these limitations, in combination with remaining limitations of claims 5-18 and 25, are neither taught nor suggested by the prior art of record.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NADER J ALHAWAMDEH whose telephone number is (571)270-0571. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9Am - 6Pm EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah A Riyami can be reached at (571)270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/NADER J ALHAWAMDEH/Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2831 /ABDULLAH A RIYAMI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2831