Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/294,490

EFFICIENT PACKET-LOSS PROTECTED DATA ENCODING AND/OR DECODING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 01, 2024
Priority
Sep 27, 2021 — GR 20210100637 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, LINH V
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1075 granted / 1206 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1230
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1206 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to RCE communication filed on 07/02/2026. Claims 1, 5, 6, 7, and 27 have been amended. Claims 1 – 30 are pending on this application. Response to Arguments 2. Applicant's arguments filed 07/02/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to claims 1 and 6, under remarks, applicant argued “Applicant respectfully submits that this mapping fails to disclose the combining operation as in claim 1 since claim 1 states that the first data portion is "a first data frame from the jitter buffer" and that the availability of the second encoding be determined based on whether it is "available in the jitter buffer”. Examiner respectful disagrees from the following: Fig. 4 of Bhatia discloses: a first data frame (Primary frame coded 486 and Redundant frame code 489) outputs from the jitter buffer (Jitter buffer 410) and that the availability of the second encoding (availability of data frame encoding 486) be determined (Bitsteream Parses 430) based on whether it is available in the jitter buffer (data framed coded 486 in Jitter Buffer 410). 3. With respect to claims 13 and 27, under remarks, applicant argued “The Office Action does not assert that the first encoding and the second encoding can be combined to generate a higher quality reconstruction of the data sample than is achievable from the first encoding alone. Accordingly, Bhatia, as applied in the Office Action, fails to disclose "obtain an encoded data output corresponding to a data sample processed by a multiple description coding encoder network, the encoded data output including a first encoding of the data sample and a second encoding of the data sample that is distinct from, and at least partially redundant to, the first encoding, the second encoding including one or more second values that are different from one or more first values of the first encoding, wherein the second encoding includes information that, when combined with the first encoding, enables a higher quality reconstruction of the data sample than is achievable from the first encoding without the second encoding. Examiner respectful disagrees from the following: Fig. 3 of Bhatia discloses the first encoding (frame coding and redundant coding of packet 4/6 or packet 3/5 or packet 2/4 or packet 3/1 in 380) and the second encoding (frame coding only of packet 2 or packet 1 in 380) can be combined (combined of encoding packets 380) to generate a higher quality reconstruction of the data sample than is achievable from the first encoding alone (frame coding and redundant coding; Col. 9 lines 22-31 discloses “ The analyzer 116 may compare the quality measurement with a threshold to determine whether the redundant frame coding in a channel aware mode contributes any quality improvement. In a case where the analyzer 116 determines the quality contribution by the partial copies included the transmitted packets 160 162 164 from the second device 122 is below the threshold, the analyzer may decide to send the second device 122 a request for coding mode change from, for example, a channel aware mode to a non-channel aware mode”). Accordingly, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 of Bhatia discloses of Bhatia disclose when combined (combined of 130) with the first encoding, enables a higher quality reconstruction of the data sample than is achievable from the first encoding without the second encoding (Col. Col. 9 lines 22-31), as in claim 13. 4. As discussed above, dependent claims 2-5, 7-12, 14-26 and 28-30 either directly or indirectly from upon independent claims 1, 6, 13 and 27, respectively. Examiner submits that the dependent claims are rejected based on reference Bhatia from previous office action as applied to claims 1, 6, 13 and 27 in this office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claims 1-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bhatia U.S. patent No. 10,475,456. Fig. 1 of Bhatia discloses a transceiver device 100 comprising multiple description coding network (Coding mode 186; first and second coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5) encoder (110 or 130) and decoder (114 or 134) for first or second vocoders (104 or 124) Fig. 3 Bhatia discloses a multiple description coding network encoding (first and second coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 -to- Col. 2 line 5) comprises primary frame coding 320 and redundant frame coding 340 for encoder in Fig. 1; and bit packing 350 for coding modes of encoded packets 380; wherein the first coding mode of comprises primary frame coding and redundant frame coding (4/6, 3/5, 2/4, and 1/3 in 380); and second coding mode comprises only primary frame coding (2 and 1 packets in 380). Fig. 4 discloses Bhatia diagram decoding network for decoder 114 or 134 in Fig. 1. Regarding claim 1. Figs 1, 3 and 4 of Bhatia discloses a device (102) comprising: a memory including a jitter buffer (Jitter buffer 410) configured to store data frames (480) received in a plurality of packets (packets 480) via a transmission (Fig. 1) ; and one or more processors coupled to the memory and configured to execute instructions from the memory (Col. 2 lines 37-40) to combine (combined of 380) two or more data portions (combining data portions 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1 in encoded packets 380 in Fig. 3 ) to generate input data (480 in Fig. 4) for a decoder network (Fig. 4) wherein a first data portion (portion 4/6) of the two or more data portions (data portion 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1 in encoded packets 380 ) is based on a first data frame (data frame output from 410) the from the jitter buffer (410) and includes a first encoding (first coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 2) of a data sample data sample (sample data 310) by a multiple description coding network (first coding mode and second coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5), and wherein content of a second data portion (content of portion 2 in packets 380) of the two or more data portions (data portions 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1 in encoded packets 380 ) depends on whether data (data of 2) based on a second encoding (frame coding of 2; Col. 2 lines 3-5) of the data sample (sample data 310) by the multiple description coding network (first and second coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5) is available in the Jitter buffer (410), the content of the second data portion (content of 2 in packet 480) including the second encoding (frame coding of 481) responsive to the second encoding (frame coding only of 481 in Fig. 4) being available in the Jitter buffer (410), the second encoding (“frame coding only” second coding mode; Col. 2 lines 3-5) including one or more second values (value of frame coding portion 482) that are different from one or more first values (value of 4 or value of 6) of the first encoding (primary frame encoding of 6 and redundant frame encoding of 4 for first portion 4/6; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 2); obtain, from the decoder network (Fig. 4), output data based (460 in Fig. 4) on the input data (400 in Fig. 4); and generate a representation of the data sample (data of 460 is a representation of the input data sampled 310) based on the output data (Output Data 460). Regarding claim 2. The device of claim 1, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further comprising wherein the content of the second data portion (portion of 2 packet in packets 380) includes filler data (redundant 372 for portion 2 packet in 370) responsive to the second encoding (second encoding mode primary frame coding only of packet 2 in 380) not being available (LOST of packet 482 in Fig. 4), the filler data generated (redundant 372 of portion 2 in 370) based on source data (330) distinct from the data sample (310). Regarding claim 3. (Currently Amended) The device of claim 2, wherein the filler data (redundant 372 for portion 2 packet in 370) is based on a second data sample (340), and wherein the data sample (310) is distinct from the second data sample (340). Regarding claim 4. The device of claim 2, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further, wherein the filler data redundant 372 for portion 2 packet in 370) is based on an interpolation of a second data sample (330) and a third data sample (340), and wherein the data sample (310), the second data sample (330) , and the third data sample (340) are distinct from each other. Regarding claim 5. The device of claim 1, Figs 1, 3 and 4 further comprising further comprising a depacketizer (depacketizer 481…487 of 480) configured to extract a plurality of data frames 481…487 from the plurality of packets (packets of 481…487) and to store the plurality of data frames in the jitter buffer (410). Regarding claim 6. Figs. 1, 3 and 4 of Bhatia disclose a method comprising: combining two or more data portions (combining data portions 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1 in encoded packets 380 ) to generate input data (480 in Fig. 4) for a decoder network (Fig. 4) ,wherein a first data portion (portion 4/6) of the two or more data portions (data portions 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1 in encoded packets 380) is based on a first data frame (data frame output from the Jitter buffer 410) from a jitter buffer (410) and includes a first encoding (first coding mode ““includes both primary frame encoding and redundant frame encoding"; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5) of a data sample (10) by a multiple description coding network (first coding mode and second coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5), and wherein content of a second data portion (content of portion 2 in packet 380) of the two or more data portions (data portions 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1 in encoded packets 380) depends on whether a second encoding (frame coding of 2; Col. 2 lines 3-5) of the data sample (10) by the multiple description coding network (first coding mode and second coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5) is available (in the jitter buffer 410) , the content of the second data portion (content of data portion 1) including the second encoding (primary frame coding of 2; Col. 2 lines 3-5) responsive to the second encoding (second coding mode; Col. 2 lines 3-5) being available in the jitter buffer ( 410), the second encoding (frame coding of 2; Col. 2 lines 3-5) including one or more second values (values of 2) that are different from one or more first values of the first encoding (values of 4 or value of 6 in data portion of 4/6) ; obtaining, from the decoder network (Fig. 4), output data (460 in Fig. 4) based on the input data (480 in Fig. 4) ; and generating a representation (460) of the data sample (310 in Fig. 3) based on the output data (460 in Fig. 3). Regarding claim 7. The method of claim 6, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further comprising retrieving the first data portion (4/6 in Fig. 4) from a jitter buffer (410), the jitter buffer (410) configured to store data frames (486…481 in Fig. 4) received from another device (122) via a transmission medium network (150) , wherein each data frame (486…481) includes data representing an encoding (Fig. 3) from the multiple description coding network (first coding mode and second coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5). Regarding claim 8. The method of claim 7, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further comprising: determining (430 in Fig. 4) whether a second data frame (482 in Fig. 2) associated with the data sample (310 in Fig. 3) is stored in the jitter buffer (410); and determining the content of the second data portion (content of 482) of the two or more data portions (data portions 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1 in encoded packets 380 in Fig. 3) based on whether the second data frame (482) is stored in the jitter buffer (410). Regarding claim 9. The method of claim 8, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further comprising, based on a determination (430) that the second data frame (482) is stored in the jitter buffer (410), using the second data frame (482) as the second data portion (2 of 487) of the two or more data portions (data portions 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1). Regarding claim 10. The method of claim 8, Figs 1, 3 and 4 further comprising, based on a determination (430) that the second data frame (482) is not stored in the jitter buffer (410), determining filler data (data of filler 487) and using the filler data (2 of 487) as the second data portion (2 for lost data frame 482) of the two or more data portions (portions 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2 and 1). Regarding claim 11. The method of claim 6, Figs 1, 3 and 4 further comprising selecting (selecting of 430) the decoder network (Fig. 4) from among a plurality of available decoder networks (420, 430) based, at least in part, on whether data (480) based on the second encoding (Second Coding Mode 420) of the data sample (310 in Fig. 3) by the multiple description coding network is available (Fig. 3; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5). Regarding claim 12. The method of claim 6, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further comprising, after determining (after determining of 430) that data based on the second encoding (primary frame coding only) is not available at a first time (first of primary frame coding and Redundant frame coding for first coding mode) and combining the first data portion (4/6) with filler data (3/5, 2/4, 1/3 to generate the input data (480) for the decoder network in Fig. 4) : determining, at a second time (time for redundant frame coding only in second coding mode) , that data based on the second encoding has become available (data of 2 and data of 1 is available), the second time (coding mode 2) subsequent to the first time (first coding mode) ; and updating (updating of 430 in) a state (state of 410) of the decoder network (Fig. 4) based on the first data portion (portion of 4/6) and the data based on the second encoding (the data of portions 2 and 1 are second coding mode; Primary frame coding only). Regarding claim 13. Figs. 1, 3 and Fig. 4 of Bhatia disclose device comprising: a memory (Col. 2 lines 37-40); and one or more processors coupled to the memory and configured to execute instructions from the memory (Col. 2 lines 37-40) to: obtain an encoded data output (380 in Fig. 3) corresponding to a data sample (310) processed by a multiple description coding encoder network (Fig. 3; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5 discloses “first coding mode and second coding mode”), the encoded data output (380) including a first encoding (first coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 2) of the data sample (310) and a second encoding (Second coding mode; Col. 2 lines 3-5) of the data sample (310) that is distinct from, and at least partially redundant (340) to, the first encoding (first coding mode; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 2) the second encoding (Second coding mode; Col. 2 lines 3-5) including one or more second values (values of 2in 380) that are different from one or more first values (values of 4 or 6 in 380) of the first encoding (first coding mode: frame coding only; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5), wherein the second encoding (first coding mode: frame coding only of packets 2 and 1 in 380; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5) includes information that (information of frame coding only of 2 and 1 packets) , when combined (combined packets of 380) with the first encoding (frame coding and redundant frame coding of 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 of packet’s 380), enables a higher quality reconstruction of the data sample than is achievable from the first encoding without the second encoding (Col. 9 lines 22-31); initiate transmission of a first data packet (packets 486…483 in Fig. 4) via a transmission medium (150 in Fig. 1, the first data packet (including data representing the first encoding (first coding mode: primary frame coding and redundant frame coding); and initiate transmission of a second data packet (transmission of packets 482..481 in Fig. 4) via the transmission medium (150 in Fig. 1), the second data packet (packets 482..481 in Fig. 4) including data representing the second encoding (second coding mode: primary frame coding only; see portions of data 2 and 1 of 380 in Fig. 3). Regarding claim 14. The device of claim 13, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further comprising one or more microphones (1146 in Fig. 11) capture an audio data stream (audio data 1146 in Fig. 11) including a plurality of audio data frames (336…361 in Fig. 3), wherein the data sample (310) includes extracted from an audio data frame (366…361 in Fig.3) of the audio data stream (audio data 1146 in Fig. 11). Regarding claim 15. The device of claim 13, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further comprising one or more cameras to capture a video data stream (Col. 1 lines 18-20) including a plurality of image data frames (336…361 in Fig. 3), wherein the data sample (310) includes features extracted from an image data frame (336…361 in Fig. 3) of the video data stream (Col. 1 lines 18-20). Regarding claim 16. The device of claim 13, Figs 1, 3 and Fig. 4 further comprising a game engine to generate a game data stream (Col. 18 lines 35-37) including a plurality of game data frames (336…361 in Fig. 3), wherein the data sample (310 in Fig. 3) includes features extracted from a game data frame (336…361 in Fig. 3) of the game data stream (Col. 18 lines 35-37). Regarding claim 17. The device of claim 13, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further comprising one or more quantizers (350 in Fig. 3) configured to generate a first quantized (4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 of 380) representation of the first encoding (first coding mode) and a second quantized (2 and 1 of 380) representation of the second encoding (second coding mode), wherein the first data packet (4/6 of 380) includes the first quantized representation (primary frame coding and Redundant frame coding) and the second data packet (2 of 380) includes the second quantized representation (primary frame coding). Regarding claim 18. (Original) The device of claim 13, Figs. 1, 3 and Fig. 4 further comprising a quantizer (350) configured to generate a quantized representation (4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380) of the encoded data output (Encoded Packets 380), wherein the first data packet (4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 of 380) includes a first data portion (portion o 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 of 380) of the quantized representation (380) and the second data packet (2 and 1 of 380) includes a second data portion (second portion of 380) of the quantized representation (4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380). Regarding claim 19. The device of claim 13, Figs. 1, 3 and F4 further disclose wherein the multiple description coding encoder network (Fig. 3) is configured to generate a plurality of encodings of the data sample (380), the plurality of encodings (380) including the first encoding (first coding mode of 4/6), the second encoding (second coding mode of 2 of 380), and one or more additional encodings (one or more addition coding of 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, and 1) wherein each of the one or more additional encodings (addition code of 1) is distinct from, and at least partially redundant (redundant 3) to, the first encoding (first encoding of 4/6) and the second encoding (second encoding of 2). Regarding claim 20. The device of claim 13, Figs, 1, 3 and Fig. 4 further disclose wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the one or more processors (Col. 2 lines 37-40) to determine a split configuration of the encoded data output (slitted configuration of4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380) , wherein the first encoding (first coding mode of 4/6) and the second encoding (second coding mode of 2) are generated based on the split configuration (split configuration of 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380). Regarding claim 21. The device of claim 20, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further disclose wherein the split configuration (split configuration of 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380) is based on quality of the transmission medium (150 in Fig. 1; Col. 8 lines 43-46 discloses packet loss). Regarding claim 22. The device of claim 20, Figs 1, 3 and Fig. 4 further discloses wherein the split configuration (split configuration of 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380) is based on criticality of the data sample (310) to output reproduction quality (460 in Fig. 4). Regarding claim 23. The device of claim 20, Figs. 1, 3 and Fig. 4 further discloses wherein the multiple description coding encoder network (Fig.3) is configured to generate a plurality of encodings (4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380) of the data sample (310) , the plurality of encodings (4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380) including the first encoding (first coding mode of 4/6), the second encoding (second coding mode of 2), and one or more additional encodings (additional coding of 3/5) , and wherein a count (count 1 to 6 of 380) of the plurality of encodings (4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380) is based on the split configuration (split configuration of 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3, 2, 1 of 380). Regarding claim 24. The device of claim 13, Figs. 1, 3 and Fig. 6) wherein the instructions ((Col. 2 lines 37-40), when executed, further cause the one or more processors (Col. 2 lines 37-40) to, prior to initiating transmission of the first data packet (4/6), determine a count of bits (Col. 5 lines 63-65) of the first data packet (366 in Fig. 3) to be allocated to the data (4/6) representing the first encoding (first coding mode). Regarding claim 25. The device of claim 13, Figs. 1, 3 and 4 further disclosing wherein the multiple description coding encoder network (Fig. 3) comprises an encoder portion (110 or 130) of a feedback recurrent (feedback recurrent between 102 and 122 for coding mode change request 186 in Fig. 1) in autoencoder (Vocoder in Fig. 1). Regarding claim 26. The device of claim 13, Fig. 1 further comprising one or more wireless transmitters (wireless transmits of 102 and 122) coupled to the one or more processors 104, 124) and configured to transmit the first data packet and the second data packet (160…164) Regarding claim 27. Figs. 1, 3 and Fig. 4 of Bhatia discloses a method comprising: obtaining an encoded data output (380 in Fig. 3) corresponding to a data sample (310) processed by a multiple description coding encoder network (Fig. 3) , the encoded data output (packets 380) including a first encoding of the data sample (first encoding mode of packet 4/6 in 380) and a second encoding of the data sample (second encoding mode of 2 packet 380) that is distinct from, and at least partially redundant (redundant frame) to, the first encoding (first encoding mode of 4/6), the second encoding (second coding mode of packet 2) including one or more second values (value of packet 2) that are different from one or more first values of the first encoding (value of 4 or value of 6 of packet 4/6); wherein the second encoding (first coding mode: frame coding only of packets 2 and 1 in 380; Col. 1 line 66 to Col. 2 line 5) includes information that (information of frame coding only of 2 and 1 packets) , when combined (combined packets of 380) with the first encoding (frame coding and redundant frame coding of 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 of packet’s 380), enables a higher quality reconstruction of the data sample than is achievable from the first encoding without the second encoding (Col. 9 lines 22-31) causing a first data packet (packet 4/6) including data representing the first encoding (first coding mode) to be sent via a transmission medium (150 in Fig. 1) ; and causing a second data packet (packet 2) including data representing the second encoding (second coding mode of packet 2) to be sent via the transmission medium (150). Regarding claim 28. The method of claim 27, Figs, 1, 3 and Fig. 4 further comprising generating one or more additional encodings of the data sample (encoding of 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 and 1 packets), wherein each of the one or more additional encodings (encoding of 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 and 1 packets) is distinct from, and at least partially redundant (redundant in Fig. 3) to, the first encoding (first coding mode 4/6) and the second encoding (second coding mode of 2 in 380). Regarding claim 29. The method of claim 27, Fig. 1, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 further comprising determining a split configuration of the encoded data output (split configuration of 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 and 1 packets in 380), wherein the first encoding (first coding mode of 4/6 packet in 380) and the second encoding (second coding mode of 2 packet in 380) are generated based on the split configuration (split configuration of 4/6, 3/5, 2/4, 1/3 and 1 packets in 380). Regarding claim 30. The method of claim 27, Figs. 1 further comprising, prior to initiating transmission of the first data packet (160), determining a count of bits (Col. 5 lines 63-65) of the first data packet (160) to be allocated to the data (4/6 of 380 in Fig. 3) representing the first encoding (first coding mode of 4/6 packet in Fig. 3). Contact Information 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Linh Van Nguyen whose telephone number is (571) 272-1810. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:30 – 5:00 Monday-Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mr. Dameon E. Levi can be reached at (571) 272-2105. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are (571-273-8300) for regular communications and (571-273-8300) for After Final communications. 08/10/2026 /LINH V NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 19, 2026
Response Filed
May 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750067
DATA COMPRESSION AND STORAGE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749803
ANTENNA UNIT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750063
TRANSITION SMOOTHING APPARATUS FOR REDUCING SPURIOUS INPUT TO A SYSTEM UNDER FEEDBACK CONTROL
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738956
SAB BASED LOOP FILTER WITH CROSS-COUPLED STRUCTURE AND ADC INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732205
Analog-to-Digital Conversion Device
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+2.4%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1206 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month