Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/294,708

PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SHEET

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Priority
Sep 17, 2021 — JP 2021-152595 +1 more
Examiner
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nitto Denko Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
649 granted / 1147 resolved
-8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1193
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
82.4%
+42.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1147 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 23,2026 has been entered. Withdrawn Rejections Any rejections and or objections, made in the previous Office Action, and not repeated below, are hereby withdrawn due to Applicant’s amendments and/or arguments in the response dated March 23, 2026. However, new rejections may have been made using the same prior art if still applicable to the newly presented amendments and/or arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 – 4 and 6 – 40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamazaki et al. (2002/0140063 A1) in view of JP 2002338936 A. A machine-generated translation of JP 2002338936 A accompanied the office action dated August 6, 2025. In reciting this rejection, the examiner will cite this translation. Yamazaki et al. disclose a pressure-sensitive adhesive sheet comprising a pressure- sensitive adhesive layer having an adhesive face protected by a release liner (Abstract; Figures; Paragraphs 0002, 0039 – 0058), wherein the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer formed from a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprising at least one adhesive selected from the group comprising an acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive, a rubber-based pressure- sensitive adhesive, a silicone-based pressure-sensitive adhesive, a polyester-based pressure-sensitive adhesive, a polyamide-based pressure-sensitive adhesive, a urethane-based pressure-sensitive adhesive, and an epoxy-based pressure-sensitive adhesive (Paragraph 0035),wherein, if the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprises the acrylic pressure- sensitive adhesive (Paragraph 0045), the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprises a photopolymerization initiator (Paragraph 0057), and wherein the photopolymerization initiator comprises at least one selected from the group comprising a benzoin ether-based photopolymerization initiator, an acetophenone-based photopolymerization initiator, a benzoin-based photopolymerization initiator, a benzyl-based photopolymerization initiator, a benzophenone-based photopolymerization initiator, and a ketal-based photopolymerization initiator (Paragraph 0057) as in claim 1. With respect to claim 2, the pressure-sensitive adhesive sheet is used for receiving an electronic component disposed on a temporary fixing material (Abstract; Figures). Regarding claim 3, the pressure-sensitive adhesive sheet is to be disposed so as to face, with a gap provided therebetween, a surface of a temporary fixing material on which an electronic component is disposed, and used for receiving the electronic component (Abstract; Figures). With regard to claim 6, a thickness of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is not less than 1 µm and not more than 500 µm (Paragraph 0041). As in claim 7, the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprising the acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive (Paragraphs 0045 – 0049). Regarding claim 9, the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer has a base material layer stacked on a surface opposite to the adhesive face (Paragraphs 0075 – 0079). For claim 10, a second pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is stacked on a surface of the base material layer on which the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is not stacked (Figures 1 and 4, #13; Paragraphs 0081 - 0082). In claim 11, the base material layer is formed from a polyester film (Paragraph 0076). With regard to claim 18, a second release liner on a second adhesive face of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer opposite the adhesive face protected by the release liner (Paragraphs(Paragraphs 0076 – 0078 and 0086). As in claim 19, a ratio of the alkyl (meth)acrylate in all monomer components (100% by weight) comprising the acrylic polymer is 85% by weight or more and 98% by weight or less, and a ratio of the hydroxyl group-containing monomer in all the monomer components (100% by weight) comprising the acrylic polymer is 1% by weight or more and 15% by weight or less, and the acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprises a crosslinking agent, and an amount of the crosslinking agent used is 0.01 parts by weight or more and 5 parts by weight or less based on 100 parts by weight of the base polymer (Paragraphs 0046 – 0049 and 0058, Example 1). With respect to claim 20, the ratio of the alkyl (meth)acrylate having a linear or branched alkyl group having 4 to 18 carbon atoms in all monomer components (100% by weight) comprising the acrylic polymer is 85% by weight or more and 98 % by weight or less, and the ratio of the acrylic polymer contains the hydroxyl group-containing monomer as the monomer component comprising the acrylic polymer in all the monomer components (100% by weight) comprising the acrylic polymer is 1% by weight or more and 15% by weight or less, and the acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprises the crosslinking agent, and the amount of the crosslinking agent used is 0.01 parts by weight or more and 5 parts by weight or less based on 100 parts by weight of the base polymer (Paragraphs 0046 – 0049 and 0058, Example 1). However, Yamazaki et al. fail to disclose the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer has a second pressure-sensitive adhesive layer stacked on a surface opposite to the adhesive face, the release liner comprises a base material having a release layer at least one release agent selected from (i) to (iii), and wherein a-the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprised in the pressure- sensitive adhesive layer is the acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive or the silicone pressure- sensitive adhesive, and a silicone if the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprises the silicon pressure-sensitive adhesive, the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprises a crosslinking agent, and an amount of the crosslinking agent used is 0.5 parts by weight or more and 10 parts by weight or less based on 100 parts by weight of the base polymer:(i) a release agent comprising the silicone-based release agent to which at least one of silicon resin, silica, and ethyl cellulose is add (ii) a long chain alkyl-based release agent (iii) a fluorine-based release agent, the release liner comprises the base material having the release liner at least one release agent selected from (i) to (iii), wherein the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprised in the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is the acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive, (i) the release agent comprising the silicone-based release agent to which at least one of silicon resin, silica, and ethyl cellulose is add (ii) the long chain alkyl-based release agent(iii) the fluorine-based release agent, wherein the release strength of the one second release liner from the one second adhesive face may be set to 1/3 to 1/2 of the release strength of the other release liner from the other adhesive face, a ratio of a sinking depth of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer, obtained by an iron ball drop test performed on the adhesive face of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer under the following condition, to a thickness of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer (sinking depth/thickness x 100) is 15% or more: Iron ball drop test: performed by dropping an iron ball of 1 g freely from a height of 1 m onto the adhesive face, the release strength of the release liner from the adhesive face of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is not less than 0.15 N/50 mm and not more than 5 N/50 mm, the water contact angle θ1 is 120° or less and 110° or more, a change rate of a probe tack value obtained after 2 hour exposure of the adhesive face to an atmospheric environment to the initial probe tack value of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is more than – 14% and wherein a displacement R of water contact angles θ1 and θ2 against the adhesive face under the following conditions T1 and T2 is 5° or less: T1: immediately after separating the release liner under an environment of 23 °C T2: after 2 hour exposure of the adhesive face to an atmospheric environment after separating the release liner under an environment of 23°C θ1: water contact angle (°) of the adhesive face under T1 θ2: water contact angle (°) of the adhesive face under T2 Displacement R (°) = θ2 - θ1. JP 2002338936 A teaches a pressure-sensitive adhesive sheet comprising a pressure- sensitive adhesive layer having an adhesive face protected by a release liner (Abstract; Paragraph 0001; Page 9, Paragraph 0044; Page 7, lines 22 - 23), the pressure-sensitive adhesive sheet is used for receiving an electronic component disposed on a temporary fixing material (Abstract), the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer has a second pressure-sensitive adhesive layer stacked on a surface opposite to the adhesive face (Page 7, line 31 – 38), the release liner comprises a base material having a release layer at least one release agent selected from (i) to (iii), and wherein a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprised in the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is an acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive (Page 3, line 8 to Page 5, line 3), (i) a release agent comprising the silicone-based release agent to which at least one of silicon resin, silica, and ethyl cellulose (Page 9, Example 1) for the purpose of processing a semiconductor wafer (Abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a second pressure-sensitive adhesive layer and release liner in Yamazaki et al. in order to process a semiconductor wafer as taught by JP 2002338936 A. With regard to the limitations of “wherein the release strength of the one second release liner from the one second adhesive face may be set to 1/3 to 1/2 of the release strength of the other release liner from the other adhesive face” and “the release liner comprises a base material having a release layer at least one release agent selected from (i) to (iii), and wherein a-the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprised in the pressure- sensitive adhesive layer is the acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive or the silicone pressure- sensitive adhesive, and a silicone if the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprises the silicon pressure-sensitive adhesive, the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprises a crosslinking agent, and an amount of the crosslinking agent used is 0.5 parts by weight or more and 10 parts by weight or less based on 100 parts by weight of the base polymer:(i) a release agent comprising the silicone-based release agent to which at least one of silicon resin, silica, and ethyl cellulose is add (ii) a long chain alkyl-based release agent (iii) a fluorine-based release agent, the release liner comprises the base material having the release liner at least one release agent selected from (i) to (iii), wherein the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition comprised in the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is the acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive, (i) the release agent comprising the silicone-based release agent to which at least one of silicon resin, silica, and ethyl cellulose is add (ii) the long chain alkyl-based release agent(iii) the fluorine-based release agent”, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to choose a release materials with the desired properties, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. MPEP 2144.07. With regard to the limitation of “a ratio of a sinking depth of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer, obtained by an iron ball drop test performed on the adhesive face of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer under the following condition, to a thickness of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer (sinking depth/thickness x 100) is 15% or more: Iron ball drop test: performed by dropping an iron ball of 1 g freely from a height of 1 m onto the adhesive face, the release strength of the release liner from the adhesive face of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is not less than 0.15 N/50 mm and not more than 5 N/50 mm, the water contact angle θ1 is 120° or less and 110° or more, a change rate of a probe tack value obtained after 2 hour exposure of the adhesive face to an atmospheric environment to the initial probe tack value of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is more than – 14% and wherein a displacement R of water contact angles θ1 and θ2 against the adhesive face under the following conditions T1 and T2 is 5° or less: T1: immediately after separating the release liner under an environment of 23 °C T2: after 2 hour exposure of the adhesive face to an atmospheric environment after separating the release liner under an environment of 23°C θ1: water contact angle (°) of the adhesive face under T1 θ2: water contact angle (°) of the adhesive face under T2 Displacement R (°) = θ2 - θ1”, Since the composition of the reference is the same as those claimed herein it follows that the adhesive sheets of Yamazaki et al. would inherently possess the properties recited in claims 1, 4, 13, and15 – 17. See MPEP 2112. Support for said presumption is found in the use of similar materials (i.e. the thickness and materials of the photopolymerization initiator, substrate and adhesives) and in the similar production steps (i.e. coating the materials on to the designated substrates at the designated locations) used to produce the adhesive sheets for electronics. It is well settled that when a claimed composition appears to be substantially the same as a composition disclosed in the prior art, the burden is properly upon the applicant to prove by way of tangible evidence that the prior art composition does not necessarily possess characteristics attributed to the CLAIMED composition. In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 15 USPQ2d 1655 (Fed. Circ. 1990); In re Fitzgerald, 619 F.2d 67, 205 USPQ 594 (CCPA 1980); In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 2109, 169 USPQ 226 (CCPA 1971). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 – 4 and 6 – 20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any combination of reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patricia L Nordmeyer whose telephone number is (571)272-1496. The examiner can normally be reached 10am - 6:30pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Patricia L. Nordmeyer/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /pln/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 April 14, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 05, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635946
Patch And Method For Using A Patch
5y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636872
ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR TEMPORARY BONDING OF SUBSTRATES
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637590
ROLL OF TAPE WITH END INDICATOR
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12577436
EMBOSSING OR DEBOSSING OF A LABEL SUBSTRATE
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12557867
ADHESIVE MOUNTABLE STACK OF REMOVABLE LAYERS
1y 7m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+37.3%)
2y 11m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1147 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month