Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/294,764

A METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HANDLING CALL SETUP PARAMETERS FOR REMOTELY INITIATED CALL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Examiner
LE, LANA N
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
479 granted / 585 resolved
+19.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
625
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 585 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 26-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pattan (US 2018/0,288,827; hereinafter Pattan). Regarding claim 26, Pattan disclose a method performed by a Mission Critical Push-To-Talk (MCPTT) server (MCPTT server 106), the method comprising: receiving a remotely initiated MCPTT call request from a first MCPTT client (MCPTT client 104) (the MCPTT server 106 receives a remotely initiated MCPTT call request from a first MCPTT client 104 at step 404a; Fig. 4a; ¶ [0151]), wherein the remotely initiated MCPTT call request comprises one or more call set up parameters including at least one of information associated with a commencement mode or information associated with a priority (priority, private call, implicit floor control parameters; Fig. 4a; ¶ [0151]); and transmitting the remotely initiated MCPTT call request to a second MCPTT client (the MCPTT server 106 transmit the remotely initiated MCPTT call request to a second MCPTT client 102 at step 406a; Fig. 4a), wherein the second MCPTT client (102) initiates a MCPTT call with at least one of the first MCPTT client or a third MCPTT client using at least one of the one or more call set up parameters or indication information indicating whether a call initiation is due to receiving of the remotely initiated MCPTT call request (the second MCPTT client 102 initiate a call with the first MCPTT client 104 at steps 414a, 418a, 420a, the initiated MCPTT call containing the priority information parameter from the MCPTT remotely initiated MCPTT call request or indication information at 416a; paragraphs [0158]-[0164]). Regarding claim 27, Pattan disclose the method of claim 26, further comprising receiving, from the second MCPTT client, a group call request including the indication information indicating that the group call request is a result of the receiving of the remotely initiated MCPTT call request (the MCPTT server 106 receives the group call request at step 514a from the second MCPTT client 102, the MCPTT group call request is an indication that the MCPTT group call request is a result of the MCPTT client receiving the remotely initiated group call request at step 506a from the first MCPTT client 104; steps 514a-530a, Fig. 5a, paragraphs [0063]-[0064], [0222]-[0233]). Regarding claim 28, Pattan disclose the method of claim 26, further comprising receiving, from the second MCPTT client, a MCPTT private call request including the indication information indicating that the MCPTT private call request is a result of the receiving of the remotely initiated MCPTT call request (the MCPTT server 106 receives a MCPTT private remote call request at step 414a from the second MPCTT client 102 indicating the MCPTT private remote call request is a result of receiving the remotely initiate private call request 404a from the first MCPTT client 104; paras. [0065]-[0066], [0150], [0158]; Fig. 4a). Regarding claim 29, Pattan disclose the method of claim 26, further comprising: verifying whether the first MCPTT client is authorized to initiate the remotely initiated MCPTT call request; and transmitting the remotely initiated MCPTT call request to the second MCPTT client based on the first MCPTT client being authorized (the MCPTT server 106 verifies and authorizes the remotely initiated MCPTT call request message from the first MCPTT client 104 and sends the remotely initiated MCPTT call request towards the second MCPTT client 102 via the SIP core; ¶ [0152], step 406a, Fig. 4a). Regarding claim 30, Pattan disclose the method of claim 26, further comprising: receiving a remotely initiated MCPTT call response from the second MCPTT client based on the transmitting of the remotely initiated MCPTT call request; and transmitting the remotely initiated MCPTT call response to the first MCPTT client (the MCPTT server 106 receives the acknowledgment message from the second MCPTT client 102 at step 410a to the remotely initiated MCPTT call request, the MCPTT server 106 sends the acknowledgment message to the first MCPTT client 104 at step 412a through the SIP core; Fig. 4a, paragraphs [0156]-[0157]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pattan et al (US 2018/0,288,827; hereinafter Pattan) in view of Solano (WO 2020,201,317). Regarding claim 16 and 21, Pattan disclose a method (Fig. 4a) performed by a first Mission Critical Push-To-Talk (MCPTT) client (first MCPTT client 102), the first Mission Critical Push-To-Talk (MCPTT) client comprising: a memory (610); and at least one processor (608) (paragraphs [0281]-[0283]; Fig. 6), wherein the at least one processor is configured to: receive a remotely initiated MCPTT call request (MCPTT remotely initiate call request 406a) from a MCPTT server (MCPTT server 106) which receives the a remotely initiated MCPTT call request (MCPTT remotely initiate call request 404a) from a second MCPTT client (second MCPTT client 104) (¶ [0151]), wherein the remotely initiated MCPTT call request comprises one or more call set up parameters including at least one of information associated with a commencement mode or information associated with a priority (parameters included in the remote initiate call request include priority; ¶ [0151]); and initiate a MCPTT call with at least one of the second MCPTT client or a third MCPTT client using at least one of the one or more call set up parameters or indication information indicating whether a call initiation is due to the receiving of the remotely initiated MCPTT call request (the first MCPTT client 102 initiate an MCPTT remote call request for establishing a call with the second MCPTT client 104 via the MCPTT server 106 starting at step 414a using the SIP core, the MCPTT call containing the priority information parameter from the MCPTT remotely initiated MCPTT call request or indication information at 416a; paragraphs [0158]-[0164]). Pattan do not explicitly disclose the first Mission Critical Push-To-Talk (MCPTT) client comprising a memory; and at least one processor coupled with the transceiver. In the same field of endeavor, Solano disclose a first Mission Critical Push-To-Talk (MCPTT) client (UE1/MCPTT client 1) comprising: a memory (604); a transceiver (606), and at least one processor (602) coupled with the transceiver (606) (Figs. 1, 6; ¶ [0047]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to do so in order to provide the type of apparatus, e.g. a user equipment, that the first MCPTT client could use to input information and make calls with the other MCPTT clients. Regarding claim 17 and 22, Pattan and Solano disclose the method and the first MCPTT client of claim 16 and 21 respectively, wherein the initiating of the MCPTT call comprises sending, to the MCPTT server, a group call request including the indication information indicating that the group call request is a result of the receiving of the remotely initiated MCPTT call request (the first MCPTT client 102 sends the MCPTT remote call request towards the MCPTT server 106 via the SIP core, the acknowledgement message to host the group identified by the MCPTT group identity, in an embodiment, the MCPTT remote call request includes the priority information, the group ID and the implicit floor control; Pattan, steps 514a-530a, Fig. 5a, paragraphs [0063]-[0064], [0222]-[0233]). Regarding claim 18 and 23, Pattan and Solano disclose the method and the first MCPTT client of claim 16 and 21 respectively, wherein the initiating of the MCPTT call comprises sending, to the MCPTT server, a MCPTT private call request including the indication information indicating that the MCPTT private call request is a result of the receiving of the remotely initiated MCPTT call request (initiating a MCPTT call comprises sending a MCPTT remote private call request 404a includes information that call is a result of the receiving of the remotely initiated MCPTT private call request 402a with notification, priority, private call parameters; Pattan; paras. [0065]-[0066], [0150], [0158]; Fig. 4a). Regarding claim 19 and 24, Pattan and Solano the method and the first MCPTT client of claim 16 and 21 respectively, wherein the MCPTT server is configured to: verify whether the second MCPTT client is authorized to initiate the remotely initiated MCPTT call request, and transmit the remotely initiated MCPTT call request to the first MCPTT client based on the second MCPTT client being authorized (the MCPTT server 106 verifies and authorizes the request message from the second MCPTT client 104 and sends the request message towards first MCPTT client 102 via the SIP core; Pattan, ¶ [0152], step 406a, Fig. 4a). Regarding claim 20 and 25, Pattan disclose the method and the first MCPTT client of claim 16 and 21 respectively, further comprising transmitting a remotely initiated MCPTT call response to the MCPTT server based on the receiving of the remotely initiated MCPTT call request, and wherein the MCPTT server is configured to transmit the remotely initiated MCPTT call response to the second MCPTT client (the first MCPTT client 102 sends the acknowledgment message to the MCPTT server 106, the MCPTT server 106 sends the acknowledgment message to the second MCPTT client 104 through the SIP core; Pattan, step 410a & step 412a; Fig. 4a, ¶ [0156]-[0157]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LANA N LE whose telephone number is (571) 272-7891. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim, can be reached at (571) 272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LANA N LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596081
COMPACT, LOW-POWER, HIGH IMAGE REJECTION SIDEBAND SEPARATION RECEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593221
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE FOR HUMAN-POWERED VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587975
HANDLING A POWER OF TRANSMISSION AND TIME OFFSET FOR FIRST AND SECOND CELL GROUPS IN DUAL CONNECTIVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574054
Systems and Methods for Switching Reference Crystal Oscillators for a Transceiver of a Wireless Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567915
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING DATA ASSOCIATED WITH A MODEL CHARACTERIZING A PROPAGATION OF TERAHERTZ RADIATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 585 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month