Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/294,994

INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Examiner
FAYED, RASHA K
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
220 granted / 355 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
394
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
68.4%
+28.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 355 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement 2. The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 2/2/2024 and 6/26/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claims 1, 10-11 and 45-46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Geng et al. (US. Pub. No. 2022/0322176 A1). Regarding claim 1, Geng discloses a method for transmitting information (See abstract and Fig. 3), executed by a non-terrestrial network (NTN) device (See Par. [3]-[4] of Geng for a reference to a network device in the non-terrestrial network (NTN) system), and comprising: sending reselection time information to user equipment (UE), wherein the reselection time information is at least configured to determine a cell reselection moment (See Par. [99]-[104] and Fig. 3 of Geng for a reference to the NTN network device sends the reselection configuration information including the reselection trigger time information that indicates the UE to immediately perform cell reselection), and the reselection time information comprises at least one of the following: first auxiliary information indicating the cell reselection moment; second auxiliary information indicating a correspondence relation between each zone in an NTN serving cell and the cell reselection moment; or third auxiliary information indicating a cell reselection moment of a reference position in the NTN serving cell (See Par. [93]-[95], [154]-[156] of Geng for a reference to the reselection configuration information comprises the moment T3, which is the moment when cell hopping/reselection occurs [First Auxiliary information]). Regarding claim 10, Geng discloses a method for transmitting information, executed by user equipment (UE) (See abstract and Fig. 3; ), and comprising: receiving reselection time information (See Par. [99]-[104] and Fig. 3 of Geng for a reference to the UE receives the reselection configuration information including the reselection trigger time information that indicates the UE to immediately perform cell reselection), wherein the reselection time information is at least configured to determine a cell reselection moment, and the reselection time information comprises at least one of the following: first auxiliary information indicating the cell reselection moment; second auxiliary information comprising a correspondence relation between each zone in an NTN serving cell and the cell reselection moment; or third auxiliary information indicating a cell reselection moment of a reference position in the NTN serving cell (See Par. [93]-[95], [154]-[156] of Geng for a reference to the reselection configuration information comprises the moment T3, which is the moment when cell hopping/reselection occurs [First Auxiliary information]). Regarding claim 11, Geng discloses determining the cell reselection moment of the UE according to the first auxiliary information (See Par. [93]-[95], [154]-[156] of Geng for a reference to the reselection configuration information comprises the moment T3, which is the moment when cell hopping/reselection occurs [First Auxiliary information]). Regarding claim 45, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 1. Regarding claim 46, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 10. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claims 2-4 and 12-14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geng et al. in view of Fu et al. (US. Pub. No. 2023/0239774 A1). Regarding claim 2, Geng does not explicitly disclose wherein the first auxiliary information is determined by the NTN device according to at least the following information: position information of the UE; an obtainment time of the position information; and time information of the UE entering a disconnected state, wherein the disconnected state comprises an idle state or an inactive state. However, Fu discloses wherein the first auxiliary information is determined by the NTN device according to at least the following information: position information of the UE; an obtainment time of the position information; and time information of the UE entering a disconnected state, wherein the disconnected state comprises an idle state or an inactive state (See Par. [165]-[168] of Fu for a reference to for RRC-Inactive [Disconnected] UE, the anchor base station sends RRCRelease PDCP PDU to the UE, including the location of the UE, time of obtaining of the UE location and the time when the UE enters the inactive state). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Fu to Geng. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by improving the delay and reducing the signalling overhead by implementing the 2-step RACH process. (Fu; Par. [63]) Regarding claim 3, Geng does not explicitly disclose wherein the position information of the UE comprises one of the following: position information reported when the UE is in a random access process; or position information reported when the UE is in a radio resource control (RRC) connected state. However, Fu discloses wherein the position information of the UE comprises one of the following: position information reported when the UE is in a random access process; or position information reported when the UE is in a radio resource control (RRC) connected state (See Par. [97]. [165]-[168] of Fu for a reference the UE position information is reported in the UE in a 4-step or a 2-step random access process (RACH)). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Fu to Geng. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by improving the delay and reducing the signalling overhead by implementing the 2-step RACH process. (Fu; Par. [63]) Regarding claim 4, Geng does not explicitly disclose wherein the sending reselection time information to user equipment (UE) comprises at least one of the following: sending radio resource control (RRC) release signaling carrying the first auxiliary information to the UE; sending a system message carrying the second auxiliary information to the UE; sending a system message carrying the third auxiliary information to the UE; sending RRC signaling carrying the second auxiliary information to the UE; or sending RRC signaling carrying the third auxiliary information to the UE. However, Fu discloses wherein the sending reselection time information to user equipment (UE) comprises at least one of the following: sending radio resource control (RRC) release signaling carrying the first auxiliary information to the UE; sending a system message carrying the second auxiliary information to the UE; sending a system message carrying the third auxiliary information to the UE; sending RRC signaling carrying the second auxiliary information to the UE; or sending RRC signaling carrying the third auxiliary information to the UE (See Par. [165]-[168] of Fu for a reference the anchor base station sends RRCRelease PDCP PDU to the UE, including the location of the UE, time of obtaining of the UE location). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Fu to Geng. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by improving the delay and reducing the signalling overhead by implementing the 2-step RACH process. (Fu; Par. [63]) Regarding claim 12, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 2. Regarding claim 13, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 3. Regarding claim 14, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 4. 7. Claims 5, 15 and 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geng et al. in view of Kubota et al. (US. Pub. No. 2016/0234735 A1). Regarding claim 5, Geng does not explicitly disclose wherein the second auxiliary information comprises: a zone identifier of each zone, and a cell reselection moment corresponding to each zone identifier. However, Kubota discloses wherein the second auxiliary information comprises: a zone identifier of each zone, and a cell reselection moment corresponding to each zone identifier UE (See Par. [93], [164], [344] and Fig. 33 of Kubota for a reference the network node sends a first signal at the UE, including a zone identifier, and using the zone ID to identify the time that the UE moves from a first zone to a second zone). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Kubota to Geng. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by improving communication quality and reliability between the BS and the UE. (Kubota; Par. [79]) Regarding claim 15, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 5. Regarding claim 17, Geng does not explicitly disclose determining the cell reselection moment of the UE according to the second auxiliary information. However, Kubota discloses determining the cell reselection moment of the UE according to the second auxiliary information (See Par. [93], [164], [344] and Fig. 33 of Kubota for a reference the network node sends a first signal at the UE, including a zone identifier, and using the zone ID to identify the time [moment] that the UE moves from a first zone to a second zone). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Kubota to Geng. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by improving communication quality and reliability between the BS and the UE. (Kubota; Par. [79]) 8. Claims 6 and 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geng et al. in view of Kubota et al. and further in view of Ryu et al. (US. Pub. No. 2021/0051444 A1). Regarding claim 6, the combination of Geng and Kubota does not explicitly disclose wherein the second auxiliary information further comprises length information of a length of a zone in a first direction, length information of a length of the zone in a second direction, a modulo parameter of the length in the first direction, a modulo parameter of the length in the second direction, and position information of a zone reference point; or, the second auxiliary information further comprises length information of a length of the zone in a first direction, length information of a length of the zone in a second direction, a modulo parameter of the length in the first direction, and a modulo parameter of the length in the second direction. However, Ryu discloses wherein the second auxiliary information further comprises length information of a length of a zone in a first direction, length information of a length of the zone in a second direction, a modulo parameter of the length in the first direction, a modulo parameter of the length in the second direction, and position information of a zone reference point (See Par. [305]-[306], [378] of Ryu for a reference the flexible zone info comprises: the length of the zone, angle (direction) of the zone. Zone ID is determined by means of modulo operation using length, width, number of zones in length, number of zones in width and the single fixed reference point of the UE current location). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Ryu to the combination of Geng and kubota. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by increasing resource utilization efficiency and reducing power consumption when implementing an improved registration area tracking mechanism. (Ryu; Par. [318]) Regarding claim 16, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 6. 9. Claims 7 and 20-21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geng et al. in view of Tripathi (US. Pub. No. 2022/0070738 A1). Regarding claim 7, Geng does not explicitly disclose wherein the third auxiliary information comprises: position information of the reference position; cell reselection moment information of the reference position; and coverage information of the NTN serving cell. However, Tripathi discloses wherein the second auxiliary information comprises: a zone identifier of each zone, and a cell reselection moment corresponding to each zone identifier UE (See Par. [68], [72], [81], [84] of Tripathi for a reference the network node sends cell reselection information, including NTN timing activation time, ephemeris and location supports, and reselection moment). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Tripathi to Geng. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by improving radio interface efficiency coverage, and quality of service. (Tripathi; Par. [3]) Regarding claim 20, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 7. Regarding claim 21, Geng does not explicitly disclose determining the cell reselection moment of the UE according to the third auxiliary information, ephemeris information associated with the NTN serving cell, and a position of the UE. However, Tripathi discloses determining the cell reselection moment of the UE according to the third auxiliary information, ephemeris information associated with the NTN serving cell, and a position of the UE (See Par. [68], [72], [81], [84] of Tripathi for a reference the network node sends cell reselection information, including NTN timing activation time, ephemeris and location supports, and reselection moment). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Tripathi to Geng. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by improving radio interface efficiency coverage, and quality of service. (Tripathi; Par. [3]) Allowable Subject Matter 10. Claim 18 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 11. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hong (US 2024/0163754 Al) teaches a cell reselection method, an apparatus, a communication device and a storage medium. Tseng et al. (U.S. 2023/0047987Al) teaches a user equipment (UE) and a method of the UE to determine how to implement the UE's Idle mode during a Service Available Period (SAP) and/or while out of a RAN coverage area of a cell connected to a Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN). Yun et al. (US 2020/0178135 A1) discloses a method for receiving satellite information in the NTN, a method for supporting handover in the NTN. 12. Any inquiry concerning this communication from the examiner should be directed to RASHA FAYED whose telephone number is (571) 270-3804. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:00AM-4:30PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the supervisory Examiner, Un Cho can be reached on (571)272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /R.K.F/Examiner, Art Unit 2413 /UN C CHO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593353
METHOD FOR INFORMATION TRANSMISSION, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK-SIDE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592755
COORDINATED BEAMFORMING (COBF) PROTOCOL FOR UNMANAGED NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587867
INTERFERENCE MANAGEMENT FOR DYNAMIC SPECTRUM SHARING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581367
MEDICAL SYSTEM WITH SELF-HEALING WIRELESS NETWORK OF SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574174
REFERENCE SIGNAL CONFIGURATION TO ACCOUNT FOR A COMPRESSION FACTOR ASSOCIATED WITH TRANSMIT (TX) NONLINEARITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+28.0%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 355 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month