Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/294,999

PAGING EARLY INDICATION TRANSMISSION METHOD, DEVICE AND APPARATUS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Priority
Aug 06, 2021 — CN 202110901344.X +2 more
Examiner
MAGLOIRE, VLADIMIR
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
256 granted / 376 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
383
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
80.7%
+40.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 376 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s argument’s filed on 4/17/2026 are persuasive, therefore previous rejections are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 22, 43 (and corresponding dependent claims) rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 22 and 43 discloses the limitations “wherein the determining the target PF includes one of the following” and “wherein the determining the first frame number includes one of the following”, because each of these limitations state at “least one of……” it requires at least two choices, however what follows after each wherein clause there is only one choice, therefore creates an indefiniteness because it unclear if there are other options, therefore the metes and bounds cannot be determined. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VLADIMIR MAGLOIRE whose telephone number is (571)270-5144. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5 PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Thomas can be reached at (571) 272-8004. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VLADIMIR MAGLOIRE/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 17, 2026
Response Filed
May 19, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627957
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING RADIO ACCESS NETWORK FUNCTION BY USING DYNAMIC SCALING
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627968
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12613306
METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING INTERFERENCE IN A RADAR SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12601835
RADAR DETECTION SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12574888
REQUEST PROCEDURE FOR POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNALS FOR WIRELESS NETWORKS
2y 11m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+22.2%)
3y 6m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 376 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month