Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/295,229

PADLOCK WITH VENDING CYLINDER

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 03, 2023
Examiner
BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Dynamic Manufacturing Group LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
777 granted / 1153 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1171
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1153 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2003/0041630 to Laitala et al. Laitala et al. disclose a padlock (10) comprising: a lock body (14) with a bottom and a top, a primary channel (28) extending through the bottom into the lock body, a pair of spaced apart parallel shackle channels (bores that receive the respective ends of the shackle; figures 1 and 2) extending through the top into the lock body; a sleeved cam (62) received in the primary channel, the sleeved cam including a sleeve, a cam (15, 38) fixed at an end of the sleeve, a window (opening that receives 22) in the sleeve, and the sleeved cam being rotatable in the primary channel, about a longitudinal axis, from a locked position to an unlocked position; a vending style lock (20) within the sleeve, the vending style lock having a locked state and an unlocked state, including a lug (22), the lug being movable from a retracted position, when the vending style lock is in the unlocked state, to an extended position, when the vending style lock is in the locked state, and the lug being aligned with the window of the sleeve, and the lug being about flush with the window the vending style lock is in the unlocked state in the retracted position (allowing for removal or insertion of the vending style lock) and the lug extending through the window in the extended position the vending style lock is in the locked state (as shown in figure 2); a lug compartment (23) in the lock body, the lug compartment being aligned with the lug when the sleeved cam is in the locked position, the lug extending into the lug compartment when the lug is in the extended position the vending style lock is in the locked state and the sleeved cam is in the locked position, and the lug not extending into the lug compartment when the lug is in the retracted position; a shackle (12), the shackle having a J-shape including a shank, a bend and a free end parallel to the shank, the bend extending from the shank to the free end, the shank and free end of the shackle being at least partially receivable in the pair of shackle channels (figures 1 and 2); a pair of locking members (11), the cam being disposed between a first locking member of the pair of locking members and a second locking member of the pair of locking members, and, in the locked position, the cam urging the first locking member against the free end and urging the second locking member against the shank of the shackle (figures 2 and 3), as in claim 1. Laitala et al. also disclose each of the free end and the shank of the shackle including a notch (17), and the notch of the free end being opposite the notch of the shank and, in the locked position, the notch of the free end and the notch of the shank being aligned with the cam, and, in the locked position, the cam urging the first locking member against the notch in the free end and urging the second locking member against the notch in the shank of the shackle (figure 2), as in claim 2, wherein the notch in the free end being hemispherical, and the notch in the shank each being hemispherical and opposed to the notch in the free end (figures 1 and 2), as in claim 3, and the pair of locking members comprise a pair of metal balls (figures 1 and 2), as in claim 4, as well as in the locked position, the cam urging the first locking member against the notch in the free end and urging the second locking member against the notch in the shank of the shackle (figure 2), as in claim 5. Laitala et al. further disclose the sleeve further comprising a peripheral fenestration extending about 90° around the sleeve (paragraph 21), as in claim 6, wherein the lock body further comprising a threaded channel aligned with the peripheral fenestration (bore that receives 24), as in claim 7, and a set screw (24) received in the threaded channel and a tip of the set screw extends into the peripheral fenestration, as in claim 8, as well as the tip of the set screw does not exert rotation preventing force against the vending style lock (paragraph 35), as in claim 9. Laitala et al. additionally disclose the lock body being a solid integrally formed structure, the primary channel being a first bore, each shackle channel of the pair of spaced apart parallel shackle channels being a second bore, and the lug compartment being an undercut in one of the shackle channels of the pair of spaced apart parallel shackle channels (construction of the padlock is shown in figures 1 and 2), as in claim 10, and the vending style lock includes a tubular keyway (figures 5-8), as in claim 11, as well as the lock body further comprises a threaded access channel (23) extending, in alignment with the cam, through one of the shackle channels of the pair of spaced apart parallel shackle channels (figures 3 and 4), as in claim 12. Laitala et al. further disclose a padlock (10) comprising: a lock body (14) with a bottom and a top, a primary channel (28) extending through the bottom into the lock body, a pair of spaced apart parallel shackle channels (bores that receive the respective ends of the shackle; figures 1 and 2) extending through the top into the lock body; a sleeved cam (62) received in the primary channel, the sleeved cam including a sleeve, a cam (15, 38) fixed at an end of the sleeve, a window (opening that receives 22) in the sleeve, and the sleeved cam being rotatable in the primary channel, about a longitudinal axis, from a locked position to an unlocked position; a lock plug (20) within the sleeve, the lock plug being rotatable with the sleeved cam, and the lock plug having a locked state and an unlocked state and including a lug (22), the lug being movable from a retracted position when the lock plug is in the unlocked state to an extended position when the lock plug is in the locked state, the lug being aligned with the window of the sleeve, the lug being substantially flush with the window when in the retracted position and the lock plug is in the unlocked state (allowing for removal or insertion of the lock plug), and the lug extending through the window when in the extended position and the lock plug is in the locked state (as shown in figure 2); a lug compartment (23) in the lock body, the lug compartment being aligned with the lug when the sleeved cam is in the locked position, the lug extending into the lug compartment when the lug is in the extended position and the sleeved cam is in the locked position, and the lug not extending into the lug compartment when the lug is in the retracted position; a shackle (12), the shackle including a shank, an intermediate section, and a free end parallel to the shank, the intermediate section extending from the shank to the free end, the shank and free end of the shackle being at least partially receivable in the pair of shackle channels (figures 1 and 2); a pair of solid metal balls (11), the cam being disposed between a first solid metal ball and a second solid metal ball, and, in the locked position, the cam urging the first solid metal ball against the free end and urging the second solid metal ball against the shank of the shackle (figures 2 and 3), as in claim 13. Laitala et al. additionally disclose each of the free end and the shank of the shackle including a notch (17), and the notch of the free end being opposite the notch of the shank and, in the locked position, the notch of the free end and the notch of the shank being aligned with the cam, and, in the locked position, the cam urging the first solid metal ball against the notch in the free end and urging the second solid metal ball against the notch in the shank of the shackle, and the notch in the free end being hemispherical, and the notch in the shank each being hemispherical and opposed to the notch in the free end (as shown in figures 1-4), as in claim 14, wherein, in the locked position, the cam urging the first solid metal ball against the notch in the free end and urging the second solid metal ball against the notch in the shank of the shackle (figure 2), as in claim 15. Laitala et al. also disclose the sleeve further comprising a peripheral fenestration extending about 90° around the sleeve (paragraph 21); and the lock body further comprising a threaded channel aligned with the peripheral fenestration; and a set screw (24) received in the threaded channel and a tip of the set screw extends into the peripheral fenestration (paragraph 35), as in claim 16, wherein the tip of the set screw does not exert rotation preventing force against the lock plug (paragraph 35), as in claim 17. Laitala et al. further disclose the lock body being a solid integrally formed structure, the primary channel being a first bore, each shackle channel of the pair of spaced apart parallel shackle channels being a second bore, and the lug compartment being an undercut in one of the shackle channels of the pair of spaced apart parallel shackle channels (construction of the padlock is shown in figures 1 and 2), as in claim 18, and the lock plug includes a tubular keyway (figures 5-8), as in claim 19, as well as the lock body further comprises a threaded access channel (23) extending, in alignment with the cam, through one of the shackle channels of the pair of spaced apart parallel shackle channels (figures 3 and 4), as in claim 20. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed March 2, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to the applicant’s argument that Laitala et al. do not disclose the lug as having two discrete operating states tied to key rotation, the examiner respectfully states there is no recitation or limitation within the claims requiring the use of a key to transition the lug from its respective operating states. In regards to the argument that Laitala et al. do not disclose the lug requires the lock be in an unlocked rotational state in order for the lug to retract, the examiner respectfully disagrees. The padlock must be in an unlocked condition to allow the lug to be retracted, allowing for access to the lug through openings 23 and 25. When the padlock is in the locked state, the shackle blocks access to the lug. Responding to the argument that Laitala et al. do not disclose the lug extends into a lug compartment in the lock body when the sleeved cam is in the locked position and the lug is in the extended position, and does not extend into the lug compartment when in the retracted position, the examiner respectfully disagrees. Laitala et al. discloses when the sleeve cam is fully inserted and the lock cylinder is on a locked position, the lug (22) extends through the sleeve window and the into the lug compartment (23) to prevent the lock cylinder from being removed from the padlock. Conversely, when the lug is in a retracted position, it is moved longitudinally from the lug compartment into the lock cylinder to allow removal of the lock cylinder from the padlock. Regarding the applicant’s argument, as best under stood, that the Examiner relies on opening 24 and element 22 to meet the limitations of the sleeve window and the lug, respectfully, the examiner disagrees. It is noted the Examiner utilized element 24 as a set screw received in a threaded channel in the lock body, accordingly the applicant’s argument is unclear as to the basis of the remarks as the alleged association is not found with the previous or current rejection. In response to the argument that Laitala et al. do not disclose the lug extending into a lug compartment only when the lock is locked, the examiner respectfully disagrees. The lug assumes a locked condition only when it is in an extended position that interlocks with the lug compartment 23. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER J BOSWELL whose telephone number is (571)272-7054. The examiner can normally be reached M-R: 9-4; F 9-12. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at 571-272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER J BOSWELL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675 CJB /cb/ June 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 03, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680337
EXTERNAL DOORKNOB LOCKING SHROUD
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12655660
ELECTRONICALLY RELEASABLE APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650035
A BICYCLE LOCKING DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12637879
KEY LOCK
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631043
MODULAR CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET
1y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+26.0%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1153 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month