Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/297,676

ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 10, 2023
Priority
Apr 18, 2022 — provisional 63/332,165 +16 more
Examiner
CLARK, GREGORY D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1042 granted / 1230 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
1261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1230 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The office acknowledges the receipt of applicants’ response to restriction dated 07/06/2026. Elected Species PNG media_image1.png 232 654 media_image1.png Greyscale A search of the prior art did not show the elected species. As no claims where specifically drawn to applicants’ elected species in independent form, no claims have been indicated as allowable. Claims written in independent form which require all the limitations of the elected species along with any dependent claims which require all the limitations of the elected species would be allowable. Under MPEP 803.02, the search was expanded to find an examinable species. Examinable Species The examinable species is represented by Compound 1-0 (paragraph 122): PNG media_image2.png 282 334 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 282 385 media_image3.png Greyscale Compound 1-0-CN reads on claims 1-4, 10-13, 17-20. Claim 5-9 and 14-16 are withdrawn from further consideration as not reading on the examinable species. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 10-13, 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ma (US 2013/0181190 A1). Regarding Claims 1-4, 10-13, 17-20, Ma teaches an OLED containing a substrate 110, an anode 115, a hole injection layer 120, a hole transport layer 125, an electron blocking layer 130, an emissive layer 135, a hole blocking layer 140, an electron transport layer 145, an electron injection layer 150, a protective layer 155, and a cathode 160 (paragraph 37). The emissive layer contains an emissive layer and the compound is a non-emissive dopant The light emitting layer contains at least a metal complex as light emitting material (Compound 1-0) and may contain a host material using the metal complex as a dopant material (paragraph 83). PNG media_image2.png 282 334 media_image2.png Greyscale Compound 1-0 shows Ring A =imidazole, RA = methyl, Z1 = N; Ring system B = dibenzofuranyl; Z2 = C; RB = H but lacks RB as a cyclic moiety or electron withdrawing group. Compound 1-0 is derived from Generic Formula 1 (GF1) (paragraph 59): PNG media_image4.png 568 414 media_image4.png Greyscale Compound 1-0 is a derived from GF1 wherein R1 = methyl; R2, R5-R6 = H; R4 = phenyl; R3 = H, M – Ir; RA = methyl; RB = H Ring a = pyridine; Ring B = dibenzofuran. The R groups are defined by a finite set of options which are viewed as functionally equivalent and readily exchangeable whereby upon selection rises rise to obvious variants of GF, absent unexpected results. One such variant reading on applicants’ Formula 1 is best viewed as a modification of Compound 1-0 wherein R3 as H is replaced with R3 as nitrile, Compound 1-0-CN: PNG media_image5.png 282 385 media_image5.png Greyscale Je teaches various substituents options for R1-R18. Such groups are viewed as functional equivalent substituents which gives rise to obvious variants based on Generic Formula 1 (GF1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to have made a variety of derivatives of generic GF1 by selecting various functional equivalent substituents which would have included the above variant which reads on the instant limitations, absent unexpected results (per claims 1-3, 17). Ring B = dibenzofuran compasses PNG media_image6.png 38 28 media_image6.png Greyscale , y = O (per claim 4). Compound 1-0-CN = PNG media_image7.png 28 126 media_image7.png Greyscale LA = PNG media_image8.png 244 200 media_image8.png Greyscale , p =1; LB = PNG media_image9.png 212 246 media_image9.png Greyscale , rq = 2; r = 0 (per claim 10). Compound 1-0-CN = PNG media_image10.png 22 60 media_image10.png Greyscale LA = 1; LB = 2 (LB = 2) (per claim 11). LB = PNG media_image11.png 188 114 media_image11.png Greyscale , Ra = methyl, Rb = H, K1 = single bond (per claim 12). Compound 1-0-CN = PNG media_image12.png 32 136 media_image12.png Greyscale La define above in treatment of claim 1; LBK, K = 1; LB = PNG media_image13.png 134 76 media_image13.png Greyscale (per claim 13). The host material for the emissive layer inlcudes PNG media_image14.png 220 398 media_image14.png Greyscale (paragraph 30) (per claims 18-19). The OLED of Ma is used in a consumer product (paragraph 27) (per claim 20). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY D CLARK whose telephone number is (571)270-7087. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-4PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Chriss can be reached on 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY D CLARK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741981
METAL COMPLEX AND USE THEREOF
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735437
ORGANIC MOLECULES FOR OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740317
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727376
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND POLYCYCLIC COMPOUND FOR THE SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703824
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.2%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1230 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month