Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/297,759

ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 10, 2023
Priority
Apr 18, 2022 — provisional 63/332,165 +18 more
Examiner
CLARK, GREGORY D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1042 granted / 1230 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
1261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1230 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The office acknowledges the receipt of applicant response to the restriction dated 07/30/2026. Elected Species PNG media_image1.png 198 654 media_image1.png Greyscale A search of the prior art did not show the elected species. As no claims where specifically drawn to applicants’ elected species in independent form, no claims have been indicated as allowable. Claims written in independent form which require all the limitations of the elected species along with any dependent claims which require all the limitations of the elected species would be allowable. Under MPEP 803.02, the search was expanded to find an examinable species. Examinable Species The examinable species is represented by I-1 (page 6): PNG media_image2.png 258 496 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein two Rq1are fused resulting in La357 (page 18): PNG media_image3.png 370 266 media_image3.png Greyscale The examinable species reads on claims 1-5, 7-10, 12-14, 17-20. Claims 6, 11, 15-16 are being withdrawn from further consideration as not reading on the examinable species. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5, 7-10, 12-14, 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tran ( KR 10-2022-0014866). Regarding Claims 1-5, 7-10, 12-14, Tran teaches a generic iridium complex I-1 (page 6): PNG media_image2.png 258 496 media_image2.png Greyscale a specific example of LA is represented by La357 (page 18) formed when two Rq1 are fused: PNG media_image3.png 370 266 media_image3.png Greyscale La 357 is bonded to Ir forming a five-membered ring. La357 reads on applicants’ LA wherein X1-X12 = C; X2 = CN; 1st RA = Rx1 = CN-phenyl;2nd RA = phenyl, Formula 2; X2 = CN. The office notes that RA is not joined to form a ring and one of RA comprises an electron-withdrawing group, CN. As Tran teach generic I-1 and a finite set of specific ligands, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of invention to have selected from the exemplified ligands which would have included La 357 which reads on the instant limitations, absent unexpected results (per claims 1-5, 7). I-1 which incorporated La 357 is heteroleptic Ring F = pyridine; Ring G = dibenzofuran; RF and RG = H (per claim 8). LA = PNG media_image4.png 368 314 media_image4.png Greyscale RA was defined above as phenyl and CN=phenyl, X(s) = C; RB = H; RC = CN (per claim 9). LA = PNG media_image5.png 274 282 media_image5.png Greyscale RA was defined above as phenyl and CN=phenyl; RB = H; RC = CN (per claim 10). I-1 which incorporated La 357 reads on IR(LA)p(LB)q(LC)r; p = 2, q = 1; r = 0 and Ir(LA)2(LB) (per claims 12-13). LB = PNG media_image6.png 358 184 media_image6.png Greyscale ; Y1-Y8 = C; Ra and Rb = H (per claim 14) Regarding Claims 17-20, Tran teaches a device (100) comprises a substrate (101), an anode (110), a hole injection layer (120), and a hole transport layer.(130), electron blocking layer (140), light-emitting layer (150), hole blocking layer (160), electron transport layer (170), electron injection layer (180) and cathode (190) (machine trans. paragraph 37). The iridium complex (I-1 which incorporated La 357) is doped into the host of the light emitting layer (machine trans. 185) (per claim 17). At least one of the host materials is a phenyl group, a pyridine group, a pyrimidine group, a triazine group, a carbazole group, or an aza group. Carbazole group, indolocarbazole group, dibenzothiophen group, azadibenzothiophen group, dibenzofuran group, azadibenzofuran group, dibenzoselenophene group, triphenylene group, azatriphenenylene group, fluorene group, silaflorene group, naphthalene group, quinoline group, isoquinoline group, quinazoline group (machine trans. pages 83-84) (per claims 18-19). The OLED can be used in a display device or a lighting device (machine trans paragraph 158) (per claim 20). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY D CLARK whose telephone number is (571)270-7087. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-4PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Chriss can be reached on 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY D CLARK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741981
METAL COMPLEX AND USE THEREOF
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735437
ORGANIC MOLECULES FOR OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740317
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727376
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND POLYCYCLIC COMPOUND FOR THE SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703824
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.2%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1230 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month