Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/298,872

METHOD FOR CHANGING THE MATERIAL IN AN EXTRUSION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 11, 2023
Priority
Jun 08, 2015 — DE 2015 108 978.5 +2 more
Examiner
LEYSON, JOSEPH S
Art Unit
1744
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Windmöller & Hölscher Kg
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
485 granted / 738 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
773
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
67.1%
+27.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 738 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on December 2, 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 13 recites “wherein the preparation of the return hose is started automatically in response to output of corresponding sensors” which is not originally disclosed and thus is new matter. In the remarks filed on December 2, 2025, Applicant states that support for claim 13 is found at least on p. 7, line 20. However, no explicit support is found therein. The original specification does not disclose automatically starting the preparation in response to corresponding sensors. What are the corresponding sensors? The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “a short refilling” which is indefinite. How short is short? The Examiner suggests the following amendments: “a Claim 1 recites “a changing filling level” which is indefinite. What defines a changing filling level? The Examiner suggests incorporated the subject matter of claim 2 into claim 1, and then cancelling claim 2. Claim 13 recites “corresponding sensors” which is indefinite. What do the sensors sense, and how are they corresponding? Claim 14, line 13, “the supply devices” lack antecedent basis clarity. The Examiner suggests the following amendments: “the at least two supply devices”. Claim 14 recites “a rinsing time” which is indefinite. What is the rinsing for, and how is the rinsing related to the claimed elements? Claims not listed above are rejected as being dependent upon a rejected claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4 and 7-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 102013100812 in view of Bauer et al. (US 2012/0204999). DE 102013100812 (figs. 1-2; see whole document of English translation attached to the Office Action mailed on April 1, 2024) discloses a method for changing material in an extrusion device comprising at least two supply devices ([0011], a single feed material OR different feed materials at the same time; two or more feedstocks; [0013], at least one feed tank 20 and one feed weigher 30 for each feed material on the extrusion device; fig. 5, [0046]) for supplying feedstock for an extruder 60, comprising the following steps: identifying a change request for changing the material in the extrusion device ([0006], [0010], [0039]; a material change request), preparing the at least two supply devices for changing the material by lowering a filling level of the at least two supply devices ([0013]-[0015], the level of the flow container 20 is lowered (emptied) to a changing fill level wherein excess feed material is no longer required for the current recipe at which point the flow container can be completely emptied into a separate container so that the material change is as short as possible), separating the at least two supply devices from a feed of feedstock to the extruder ([0028], sealed against flow (to separate); [0039] closing flap 44 separates the flow container 20 from feed to the extruder 60 as shown in figs. 1-2), discharging feedstock from the separated at least two supply devices to empty the at least two supply devices ([0015], [0016], [0028], [0039]-[0041]; flow container 20 is completely emptied), filling subsequent materials into the empty at least two supply devices [0015], [0028], [0039]- [0041], wherein a separate container (a discharge container) is used for emptying/discharging the feedstock from the flow tank (flow container), which emptied/discharged feedstock material can be disposed of as waste or reused or recycled ([0015]-[0016], excess feed material in the flow container 20 is completely emptied/discharged into a separate container); wherein the extrusion device comprises filling level sensors which initiate a short refilling in the form of a refilling push so that the filling level of the at least two supply devices does not go below a changing filling level ([0013]-[0015], individual fill sensors report fill level; as soon as the fill level has reduced to such an extent that there is risk of the extruder running empty (i.e., level below the changing filling level), refilling occurs before the extruder runs empty (i.e., refilled so it does not go below the changing filling level)). However, DE 102013100812 does not disclose the discharge container being cleaned to prepare the supply device, and being fastened to a container interface of the respective supply device, or wherein removal of a filled discharge container is carried out after the discharge, as recited by instant claim 1. Bauer et al. (US 2012/0204999) disclose a discharge method including a supply device 1 for supplying a pourable bulk material such as powder or particulates [0033]; wherein a discharge container 10 is removably fastened to a container interface of the supply device ([0040], closing mechanism 4 of the outlet 3 of the supply device 1 seats on the approximately congruent closing mechanism 11 of inlet 12 of the container 10 (i.e., seat interface); and wherein removal of a filled discharge container is carried out after the discharge (figs. 1-11; [0034], [0040], [0043]-[0044], closing mechanism 11 of the discharge container 10 is connected in a detachable manner with dosing outlet 3 of the supply device 1, the discharge container is detached/removed from the supply device 1 after filling, and then travels to an evacuation station where the filled material is removed and transferred). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to modify the discharge container and method of DE 102013100812 with a discharge method, as disclosed by Bauer et al. (US 2012/0204999), because DE 102013100812 discloses discharging feedstock (bulk material) into a separate container (a discharge container), as disclosed above, and because such a modification is known in the bulk material supply art and would provide an alternative configuration for discharging the material into a separate container (a discharge container) known to be operable in the bulk material supply art. As to the separate (discharge) container being cleaned to prepare the supply device, DE 102013100812 further discloses that feed material may adhere to parts of the device, which parts are cleaned from the feed material as a preparation step [0019]-[0022]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the method by cleaning the separate (discharge) container to prepare the supply device because it is known in the art to clean parts of the device as a preparation step, as disclosed by DE 102013100812, and because such cleaning would prevent mixing/contamination of the feed material being discharged into the separate (discharge) container with any material previously in the separate (discharge) container thereby enabling recycling of the discharged feed material. Note that DE 102013100812 further discloses that discharged feed material in the separate (discharge) container can be returned to a collecting container/silo containing that particular feed material [0015] (i.e., removal of material from the container). DE 102013100812 further discloses the method: (Claim 2) wherein the filling level of the at least two supply devices is reduced to a changing filling level to prepare said supply devices ({0013]-[0015], the level of the flow container 20 is lowered (emptied) to a changing fill level wherein excess feed material is no longer required for the current recipe at which point the flow container can be completely emptied into a separate container so that the material change is as short as possible); (Claim 4) wherein the steps at least of identifying, of preparing, of separating, of discharging or of filling in are carried out automatically, based on a manual or an automatic activation [0010]; (Claim 7) wherein a cleaning step for cleaning the separated at least two supply devices is carried out after the discharge of the feedstock from the separated supply devices ([0019]-[0022], [0028], the flow container/tank 20 is sealed (separated), completely emptied and then cleaned); (Claim 8) wherein the subsequent materials are brought to the extrusion device to prepare the supply devices for changing the material ((0009], [0015], [0039], [0041], filling the empty flow container is carried out as a preparation step; fig. 1, follow-up material is brought by suction pipe 90); (Claim 9) wherein the material is changed in parallel at least sectionally in terms of time for all of the supply devices of the extrusion device, except for a last supply device of all the supply devices ({0011], the extrusion device is fed with a single feed material (i.e., a first single supply device) or with different feed materials (i.e., plural first supply devices), wherein changing plural feed stocks/materials (i.e., plural first supply devices) can be carried out in parallel; a further modification includes adding a last supply device (smaller flow container 24), wherein while feedstock is changed in the first single supply device (or alternatively when different feedstocks are changed in the plural first supply devices in parallel, as mentioned above), the last supply device feeds feedstock to the extrusion device (fig. 2; [0018], [0042]); DE 102013100812 discloses that individual features of the embodiments can be freely combined with one another [0047]); (Claim 10) wherein a completion signal is output after the discharge of the feedstock, which indicates the completion of the discharge to the operating personnel (paragraphs [0012]-[0013], [0025], [0027], current status (signal) is output on an optical display (to operating personnel), a sensor device communicates the fill level of the flow container and current operating status, note that a zero fill level communication output on the optical display would define a completion signal indicating completion of the discharge to operating personnel); (Claim 11) wherein the cleaning step has the form of cleaning by a cleaning device ([0019]- [0022], [0043], fig. 3; cleaning devices [0021]); and (Claim 12) wherein the subsequent materials are filled into a feed container of the empty at least two supply devices ([0015], [0039]-[0041]; fig. 1; the follow-up (subsequent) material from silo 110 is filled into an empty container feed 20). Claim(s) 5 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 102013100812 in view of Bauer et al. (US 2012/0204999) as applied to claims 1-2, 4 and 7-12 above, and further in view of Koch et al. (US 4,336,012). DE 102013100812 and Bauer et al. (US 2012/0204999) discloses the method substantially as claimed, as mentioned above, except for all the limitations recited by claims 5 and 6. DE 102013100812 further discloses that the steps of the method can be carried out in a production machine comprising at least two of the extrusion devices (fig. 4; [0045]). However, DE 102013100812 does not disclose each extrusion device produces one layer of a plastic film. Koch et al. (US4,336,012) disclose a method of extruding a multilayer plastic film comprising providing at least two extrusion devices 24, 25, 26, wherein each extrusion device produces one layer A, B, C of the plastic film (figs. 1-17). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the at least two of the extrusion devices of DE 102013100812 wherein each extrusion device produces one layer of a plastic film, as disclosed by Koch et al. (US 4,336,012), because such a modification is known in the art and would enable the method to produce a multilayer plastic film. As to claim 6, DE 102013100812 further discloses the method, wherein an analysis of all feedstock and of all subsequent materials, on the basis of which a change order is output, which provides an execution order at least for the individual extrusion devices or for the individual supply devices of the extrusion devices, takes place after the identification of the change request ((fig. 4; [0045], two extrusion devices according to the embodiment of fig. 1; [0013]-[0017], after change request, analysis of current recipe (feedstocks of the extrusion devices) and expected recipe (subsequent materials for the extrusion devices) provides calculation of the point in time and under what conditions the production of the first recipe is ended, on the basis of this knowledge and calculation, a preparation step/steps (a change order) is/are carried out (output), which enables execution (provides the execution order) of the material change for the extrusion devices and/or the supply devices). Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 102013100812 in view of Satake et al. (US 4,955,550) and Mohammed et al. (US 2014/0261873). DE 102013100812 (figs. 1-2; see whole document of English translation attached to the Office Action mailed on April 1, 2024) discloses a method for changing material in an extrusion device comprising at least two supply devices ([0011], a single feed material OR different feed materials at the same time; two or more feedstocks; [0013], at least one feed tank 20 and one feed weigher 30 for each feed material on the extrusion device; fig. 5, [0046]) for supplying feedstock for an extruder 60, comprising the following steps: identifying a change request for changing the material in the extrusion device ({O006], [0010], [0039]; a material change request), preparing the at least two supply devices for changing the material by lowering a filling level of the at least two supply devices ([0013]-[0015], the level of the flow container 20 is lowered (emptied) to a changing fill level wherein excess feed material is no longer required for the current recipe at which point the flow container can be completely emptied into a separate container so that the material change is as short as possible), separating the at least two supply devices from a feed of feedstock to the extruder ([0028], sealed against flow (to separate); [0039] closing flap 44 separates the flow container 20 from feed to the extruder 60 as shown in figs. 1-2), discharging feedstock from the separated at least two supply devices to empty the at least two supply devices ([0015], [0016], [0028], [0039]-[0041]; flow container 20 is completely emptied), filling subsequent material into the empty at least two supply devices [0015], [0028], [0039] - [0041], wherein a separate container (a discharge container) is used for emptying/discharging the feedstock from the flow tank (flow container), which emptied/discharged feedstock material can be disposed of as waste or reused or recycled ([0015]-[0016], excess feed material in the flow container 20 is completely emptied/discharged into a separate container). However, DE 102013100812 does not disclose a return hose, which returns the discharged feedstock into a storage device, is fastened to a corresponding container interface. Satake et al. (US 4,955,550) disclose a method of changing material in an extrusion device (abstract; fig. 2), including a container 33 for emptying/discharging feedstock, wherein a return hose 62, 72, 74, 75, which returns the discharged feedstock into a storage device 22, 23, 24, is fastened to a corresponding container interface (the return hose is connected to the container 33 at a container interface as shown in fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to modify the method of DE 102013100812 wherein a return hose, which returns the discharged feedstock into a storage device, is fastened to a corresponding container interface, as disclosed by Satake et al. (US 4,955,550) because such a modification is known in the art and would enable discharged feedstock to be returned to a storage device and because DE 102013100812 discloses that discharged material in the separate container can be reused or recycled, as mentioned above. DE 102013100812 further disclose that a return hose (suction line) is prepared by cleaning the return hose directly after a respective change as the previous feed material may adhere to the return hose ([0019], [0040]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further prepare the return hose by cleaning the return hose directly after a respective material change, as disclosed by DE 102013100812, because such a modification is known in the art and would enable the return hose to be prepared for a coming material change. As shown in 2 of Satake et al. (US 4,955,550), if the return hose 62 is cleaned after a respective material change in view of the modification above, the return hose 62 would be already present in a receptive position and embodiment for a coming material change. As to the limitations of “wherein the preparation of the return hose is started automatically in response to output of corresponding sensors”, Mohammed et al. (US 2014/0261873) discloses the preparation of a discharge container 192 is automatically started in response to presence sensors 205, 210, 215 to detect if the container 192 is in a fill position and to enable the start of the discharge into the container 192. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the method wherein the preparation of the discharge container hose is started automatically in response to output of corresponding sensors, as disclosed by Mohammed et al. (US 2014/0261873), because such a modification is known in the discharging art and would provide an alternative configuration enabling detection of a discharge container to enable the start of the discharge. As mentioned above, it is known to discharge using a discharge container or a return hose. Thus, it would have been further obvious, if a return hose is used, that starting automatically the preparation of the return hose in response to the sensors would detect if the return hose is in a position to receive the discharge. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 102013100812 in view of Bauer et al. (US 2012/0204999), Koch et al. (US 4,336,012) and Stevens et al. (US 2013/0131288). DE 102013100812 (figs. 1-2; see whole document of English translation attached to the Office Action mailed on April 1, 2024) discloses a method for changing material in an extrusion device comprising at least two supply devices ([0011], a single feed material OR different feed materials at the same time; two or more feedstocks; [0013], at least one feed tank 20 and one feed weigher 30 for each feed material on the extrusion device; fig. 5, [0046]) for supplying feedstock for an extruder 60, comprising the following steps: identifying a change request for changing the material in the extrusion device ({O006], [0010], [0039]; a material change request), preparing the at least two supply devices for changing the material by lowering a filling level of the at least two supply devices ([0013]-[0015], the level of the flow container 20 is lowered (emptied) to a changing fill level wherein excess feed material is no longer required for the current recipe at which point the flow container can be completely emptied into a separate container so that the material change is as short as possible), separating the at least two supply devices from a feed of feedstock to the extruder ([0028], sealed against flow (to separate); [0039] closing flap 44 separates the flow container 20 from feed to the extruder 60 as shown in figs. 1-2), discharging feedstock from the separated at least two supply devices to empty the at least two supply devices ([0015], [0016], [0028], [0039]-[0041]; flow container 20 is completely emptied), filling subsequent material into the empty at least two supply devices [0015], [0028], [0039]- [0041], wherein a separate container (a discharge container) is used for emptying/discharging the feedstock from the flow tank (flow container), which emptied/discharged feedstock material can be disposed of as waste or reused or recycled ({0015]-[0016], excess feed material in the flow container 20 is completely emptied/discharged into a separate container); and wherein an analysis of all feedstock and of all subsequent materials, on the basis of which a change order is output, which provides an execution order at least for the individual extrusion devices or for the individual supply devices of the extrusion devices, takes place after the identification of the change request ((fig. 4; [0045], two extrusion devices according to the embodiment of fig. 1; [0013]- [0017], after change request, analysis of current recipe (feedstocks of the extrusion devices) and expected recipe (subsequent materials for the extrusion devices) provides calculation of the point in time and under what conditions the production of the first recipe is ended, on the basis of this knowledge and calculation, a preparation step/steps (a change order) is/are carried out (output), which enables execution (provides the execution order) of the material change for the extrusion devices and/or the supply devices), wherein the change order comprises analysis of a viscosity of a material ([0022], high viscosity differences between the feed material and the follow-up material are analyzed (considered)). However, DE 102013100812 does not disclose the discharge container being cleaned to prepare the supply device, and being fastened to a container interface of the respective supply device, OR wherein removal of a filled discharge container is carried out after the discharge, OR wherein the steps are carried out in a production machine comprising at least two of the extrusion device, wherein each extrusion device produces one layer of a plastic film, OR wherein a rinsing time is changed depending on the viscosity. Bauer et al. (US 2012/0204999) disclose a discharge method including a supply device 1 for supplying a pourable bulk material such as powder or particulates [0033]; wherein a discharge container 10 is removably fastened to a container interface of the supply device ([0040], closing mechanism 4 of the outlet 3 of the supply device 1 seats on the approximately congruent closing mechanism 11 of inlet 12 of the container 10 (i.e., seat interface); and wherein removal of a filled discharge container is carried out after the discharge (figs. 1-11; [0034], [0040], [0043]-[0044], closing mechanism 11 of the discharge container 10 is connected in a detachable manner with dosing outlet 3 of the supply device 1, the discharge container is detached/removed from the supply device 1 after filling, and then travels to an evacuation station where the filled material is removed and transferred). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to modify the discharge container and method of DE 102013100812 with a discharge method, as disclosed by Bauer et al. (US 2012/0204999), because DE 102013100812 discloses discharging feedstock (bulk material) into a separate container (a discharge container), as disclosed above, and because such a modification is known in the bulk material supply art and would provide an alternative configuration for discharging the material into a separate container (a discharge container) known to be operable in the bulk material supply art. As to the separate (discharge) container being cleaned to prepare the supply device, DE 102013100812 further discloses that feed material may adhere to parts of the device, which parts are cleaned from the feed material as a preparation step [(0019]-[0022]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the method by cleaning the separate (discharge) container to prepare the supply device because it is known in the art to clean parts of the device as a preparation step, as disclosed by DE 102013100812, and because such cleaning would prevent mixing/contamination of the feed material being discharged into the separate (discharge) container with any material previously in the separate (discharge) container thereby enabling recycling of the discharged feed material. Note that DE 102013100812 further discloses that discharged feed material in the separate (discharge) container can be returned to a collecting container/silo containing that particular feed material [0015]. Koch et al. (US 4,336,012) disclose a method of extruding a multilayer plastic film comprising providing at least two extrusion devices 24, 25, 26, wherein each extrusion device produces one layer A, B, C of the plastic film (figs. 1-17). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the at least two of the extrusion devices of DE 102013100812 wherein each extrusion device produces one layer of a plastic film, as disclosed by Koch et al. (US 4,336,012), because such a modification is known in the art and would enable the method to produce a multilayer plastic film. DE 102013100812 further discloses that feed material may adhere to parts of the device, which parts are cleaned from the feed material as a preparation step [0019]-[0022]. Stevens et al. (US 2013/0131288) discloses cleaning extrusion equipment between runs of different polymers by rinsing [0007], [0045]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the method by rinsing, as disclosed by Stevens et al. (US 2013/0131288), because such a modification is known in the art and would enable cleaning between production runs of different polymers and because DE 102013100812 discloses cleaning is desired. It would be obvious, if not inherent, that rinsing would require a rinsing time that enables the equipment to be cleaned. As to the rinsing time being changed depending on the viscosity, viscosity dictates the flowability of the material. Thus, it would have been further obvious that the viscosity (flowability) of the material would affect the rinsing time. For example, materials with low viscosity flow easily and thus require less rinse time to enable cleaning. Material with high viscosity do not flow easily and thus require more rinse time to enabling cleaning. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed December 2, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that claim 1 was amended to require that the extrusion device comprises filling level sensors which initiate a short refilling in the form of a refilling push SO that the filling level of the at least two supply devices does not go below a changing filling level. This is not taught or suggested by DE 10 2013 100812 and Bauer. DE 10 2013 100812 recites sensors whose readings are used to predict when the first recipe will be terminated (e.g., [0013]). However, DE 10 2013 100812 does not suggest a refilling push or an attempt to prevent going below a changing filling level. Bauer does not have sensors, at all, and does not suggest a refilling push or an attempt to prevent going below a changing filling level. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. Such limitations are taught by DE 10 2013 100812 as mentioned in the prior art rejections above. Applicant argues the new limitations of claims 13 and 14 However, such limitations are obvious in view of the newly cited art used in the prior art rejections above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH S LEYSON whose telephone number is (571)272-5061. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam Xiao Zhao can be reached at 5712705343. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.S.L/Examiner, Art Unit 1744 /XIAO S ZHAO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1744
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 11 earlier events
Aug 20, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Dec 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Apr 30, 2026
Interview Requested
May 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629877
INTERMITTENT EXTRUSION SYSTEM AND EXTRUSION DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12600073
Apparatus For Adjusting The Thickness of a Resin Film Exiting an Extrusion Lip of a Blown Film Extruder
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594707
PVC FLOORING PRODUCTION LINE
1y 12m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12571130
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR FORMING PATTERNED FIBER ARRAYS WITH AUTOMATED TRACKS
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12537118
Striped Cable and Process and Apparatus for Making Same
5y 4m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.5%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 738 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month