Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/299,412

MULTI-WINDING POWER SUPPLY FOR MULTI-VOLTAGE CHARGER

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 12, 2023
Examiner
MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Techtronic Cordless Gp
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
-50%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
1 granted / 2 resolved
-18.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -100% lift
Without
With
+-100.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
50
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) were submitted on 01/13/2025 and 04/13/2023. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. When available, the examiner considered the US equivalents of the foreign publications cited on the IDS. IDS citation US equivalent Pub. Date Inventor EP 3952092 A1 US 2022/0045619 A1 02/10/2022 Jia et al. WO 2021050912 A1 US 2023/0116349 A1 04/13/2023 Shirazi EP 3609065 A1 US 2020/0052498 A1 02/13/2020 Liu et al. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the following must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. “LLC converter” (claim 9) – The capacitors and inductors required to form an LLC converter per specification ¶ [38] are not drawn. Thus, the LLC converter is not drawn. The circuit drawings should be annotated to label the following. Otherwise, it is not apparent where each of these voltages and currents are present in the circuit. “first nominal charging voltage” “second nominal charging voltage” “first output voltage” “second output voltage” “first charging current” “second charging current” Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) and/or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 9 needs to define the abbreviation “LLC”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, lines 11-13 recite “the first secondary winding configured to receive power from the primary winding and generate a second nominal charging voltage for supply to the second battery pack”. This language is indefinite because the circuit realization is unclear and not aligned with the disclosure. Thus, for examination purposes, it is interpreted that the language is intended to be recited as “the [[first]] second secondary winding configured to receive power from the primary winding and generate a second nominal charging voltage for supply to the second battery pack”. Claim 17, lines 2-3 are indefinite as to whether “having a first battery interface” is intended to modify the “battery pack interface” or the “first battery pack”. In accordance with the disclosure, it is interpreted that “having a first battery interface” is intended to modify the “battery pack interface”. Claim 17, lines 2-3 are indefinite as to whether “having a second battery interface” is intended to modify the “battery pack interface” or the “second battery pack”. In accordance with the disclosure, it is interpreted that “having a second battery interface” is intended to modify the “battery pack interface”. Claims 2-9 and 18-20 are further rejected for their dependency on other rejected claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jia et al. (US 2022/0045619 A1) in view of Shirazi et al. (US 2023/0116349 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Jia discloses a charger (“charging and discharging device 100”; generic embodiment of Fig. 2, with various specific embodiments drawn in Figs. 3, 4A, 5-9) comprising the following features. PNG media_image1.png 897 1665 media_image1.png Greyscale Jia further discloses a first battery pack interface (“second port 22”; ¶ [33]: “22 … may be electrically connected to a high-voltage battery”) configured to connect to a first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses a second battery pack interface (“third port 23”; ¶ [33]: “23 … may be electrically connected to a low-voltage battery”) configured to connect to a second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses a primary driver circuit (combo of “first conversion circuit 31”, “first controllable switch 40”, “first resonance circuit 51”, and “primary winding 11”; generic embodiment of Fig. 2, with various specific embodiments drawn in Figs. 3, 4A, 5-9) for receiving power from an external power supply (“first charging and discharging unit” connected to “first port 21” per ¶ [32]). Jia further discloses the primary driver circuit (11, 31, 40, 51) including a primary winding (“primary winding 11” of “transformer 10”). Jia further discloses a first secondary winding (“secondary winding 12” of “transformer 10”) connected to the first battery pack interface (“second port 22”; ¶ [33]: “22 … may be electrically connected to a high-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses the first secondary winding (12) configured to receive power from the primary winding (11) and generate a first nominal charging voltage (“VHV”) for supply to the first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”) when the first battery pack is connected to the first battery pack interface (22). Jia further discloses a second secondary winding (“secondary winding 13” of “transformer 10”) connected to the second battery pack interface (“third port 23”; ¶ [33]: “23 … may be electrically connected to a low-voltage battery”). Jia further teaches the second secondary winding (13) configured to receive power from the primary winding (11) and generate a second nominal charging voltage (“VLV”) for supply to the second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”) when the second battery pack is connected to the second battery pack interface (23). Though Jia discloses each of the battery pack interfaces are configured to connect to the battery packs, Jia does not disclose each of the battery pack interfaces are configured to receive the battery packs. Jia further does not disclose “the second battery pack interface being different than the first battery pack interface”, though it is implied because the two interfaces are intended for batteries of different voltages. Shirazi teaches (see annotated Fig. 1A, included infra) a charger (“power converter device 100”, embodied as “charger 100A”; Figs. 1A, 2) comprising the following features. Shirazi further teaches a first battery pack interface (“first recess 110”; Fig. 1A) configured to receive a first battery pack (“first-type of battery pack”, not drawn; ¶ [61]: “110 on the housing 105 to receive a first-type of battery pack”). Shirazi further teaches a second battery pack interface (“second recess 115”; Fig. 1A) configured to receive a second battery pack (“second-type of battery pack”, not drawn; ¶ [61]: “115 on the housing to receive a second-type of battery pack”). Shirazi further teaches the second battery pack interface (115) being different (Fig. 1A shows visually different structures) than the first battery pack interface (110). PNG media_image2.png 878 976 media_image2.png Greyscale Shirazi further teaches the mechanical structure of the battery pack interfaces to enable them to receive real-world power tool battery packs of different voltages (¶ [24]). Shirazi’s structure is particularly suitable as a mechanical embodiment for Jia’s charger, which is intended for batteries of different voltages (Jia ¶ [29, 33]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the first and second battery pack interfaces disclosed by Jia to be embodied by the mechanical structures taught by Shirazi, to enable the charger to receive real-world power tool battery packs of different voltages. Regarding Claim 2, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 1. Jia further discloses the charger (100) further comprising a controller (“controller 60”; Fig. 4A) and a sensor (Fig. 4A shows current sensors to detect “IS1”, “I_HV”, and “I_LV”; Fig. 4A also shows voltage sensors to detect “V_HV” and “V_LV”). Regarding Claim 3, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 2. Jia further discloses the controller (60) is configured to receive a signal (any of “IS1”, “I_HV”, “I_LV”, “V_HV”, or “V_LV”) from the sensor indicative of a characteristic (current or voltage) of at least one selected from a group consisting of the first secondary winding (“IS1”, “I_HV”, and “V_HV” are indicative of the first secondary winding “12”) and the second secondary winding (“I_LV” and “V_LV” are indicative of the second secondary winding “13”). Jia further discloses the controller (60) is configured to control the primary driver circuit (via “S Control Signal”; Fig. 4A) based on the signal (each of “IS1”, “I_HV”, “I_LV”, “V_HV”, and “V_LV” is considered in the control scheme of “60”). Regarding Claim 4, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 1. Jia further discloses the charger (100) further comprising a first charger control circuit (“second conversion circuit 32” with supporting control features from “driving” and “60”; see annotated Fig. 4A, included infra) configured to determine a first output voltage (“VCD”; Figs. 4A, 4B; determined via sensing and controlling “VHV” via control of switches “S5-S8”; Fig. 4B shows “VCD” is either “+VHV” or “-VHV”, depending on the states of “S5-S8”) of the first secondary winding (12). Jia further discloses the first charger control circuit (“32”, “driving”, “60”) is further configured to regulate, in response to the first output voltage (VCD), the first nominal charging voltage (VHV). PNG media_image3.png 936 1274 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 5, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 4. NOTE: See the annotated Jia Fig. 4A, included supra in claim 4’s rejection. Jia further discloses the charger (100) further comprising a second charger control circuit (“third conversion circuit 33” with supporting control features from “driving” and “60”; Fig. 4A) configured to determine a second output voltage (“VEF”; Figs. 4A, 4B; determined via sensing and controlling “VLV” via control of switches “S9-S12”; Fig. 4B shows “VEF” is either “+VLV” or “-VLV”, depending on the states of “S9-S12”) of the second secondary winding (13). Jia further discloses the second charger control circuit (“33”, “driving”, “60”) is further configured to regulate, in response to the second output voltage (VEF), the second nominal charging voltage (VLV). Regarding Claim 6, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 1. NOTE: See the annotated Jia Fig. 4A, included supra in claim 4’s rejection. Jia further discloses the charger (100) further comprising a current sensor (Fig. 4A shows a first current sensor “current detection” connected to “12” through “32”) connected to the first secondary winding (12). Jia further discloses the charger (100) further comprising a current sensor (Fig. 4A shows a second current sensor “current detection” connected to “13” through “33”) connected to the second secondary winding (13). Regarding Claim 9, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 1. Jia further discloses the primary driver circuit (11, 31, 40, 51), the first secondary winding (12), and the second secondary winding (13) form an LLC converter (the combinations of windings “11-13” and “51-53” each form sets of two inductors and one capacitor; Fig. 2). NOTE: The instant application’s disclosure (¶ [38]) defines an LLC converter as “the converter includes two inductors and one capacitor”. Claims 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jia et al. (US 2022/0045619 A1) in view of Shirazi et al. (US 2023/0116349 A1) and the Maxim Integrated data sheet (MAX9621, 02/2020, Maxim Integrated, 19-5024, Rev. 2) (hereinafter “Maxim”). NOTE: The Maxim reference is currently available at the following link: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/max9621.pdf Regarding Claim 7, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 6. NOTE: See the annotated Jia Fig. 4A, included supra in claim 4’s rejection. Jia further discloses the first current sensor (see annotated Fig. 4A) is configured to sense a first charging current (“I_HV”; Fig. 4A) supplied to the first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses the second current sensor (see annotated Fig. 4A) is configured to sense a second charging current (“I_LV”; Fig. 4A) supplied to the second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”). Jia does not disclose the two charging currents are sensed by a single current sensor. Instead, Jia discloses a first current sensor and a second current sensor. Maxim teaches a first current sensor and a second current sensor can be combined into a single current sensor (page 1, General Description: “MAX9621 provides a single-chip solution to interface two 2-wire Hall-effect sensors to low-voltage microprocessors”). Maxim further teaches the dual current sensor is advantageous for its small size (3mm x 5mm) in a single device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the two current sensors disclosed by the combination of Jia and Shirazi to be integrated into a single current sensor, as taught by Maxim, to optimize the charger design for a small size, which is more convenient for the user to handle. Regarding Claim 8, the combination of Jia, Shirazi, and Maxim teaches the charger of claim 7. Jia further discloses the first secondary winding (12) generates (via control of switches “S1-S4”, “S”, and “S5-S8” by controller “60”; Fig. 4B) the first nominal charging voltage (VHV) based on the first charging current (I_HV). Jia further discloses the second secondary winding (13) generates (via control of switches “S1-S4”, “S”, and “S9-S12” by controller “60”; Fig. 4B) the second nominal charging voltage (“VLV”) based on the second charging current (“I_LV”). Claims 10-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jia et al. (US 2022/0045619 A1) in view of Shirazi et al. (US 2023/0116349 A1). Regarding Claim 10, Jia discloses (see annotated Fig. 2, included supra in claim 1’s rejection) a method (operational method for “100”) of operating a charger (“charging and discharging device 100”; generic embodiment of Fig. 2, with various specific embodiments drawn in Figs. 3, 4A, 5-9), comprising the following. Jia further discloses connecting, via a first battery pack interface (“second port 22”; ¶ [33]: “22 … may be electrically connected to a high-voltage battery”), a first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses connecting, via a second battery pack interface (“third port 23”; ¶ [33]: “23 … may be electrically connected to a low-voltage battery”), a second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses receiving, via a primary driver circuit (combo of “first conversion circuit 31”, “first controllable switch 40”, “first resonance circuit 51”, and “primary winding 11”; generic embodiment of Fig. 2, with various specific embodiments drawn in Figs. 3, 4A, 5-9), power from an external power supply (“first charging and discharging unit” connected to “first port 21” per ¶ [32]). Jia further discloses the primary driver circuit (11, 31, 40, 51) including a primary winding (“primary winding 11” of “transformer 10”). Jia further discloses connecting, via the first battery pack interface (“second port 22”; ¶ [33]: “22 … may be electrically connected to a high-voltage battery”), a first secondary winding (“secondary winding 12” of “transformer 10”) to the first battery pack interface (22). Jia further discloses receiving, via the first secondary winding (12), power from the primary winding (11). Jia further discloses generating, via the first secondary winding (12), a first nominal charging voltage (“VHV”) for supply to the first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”) when the first battery pack is connected to the first battery pack interface (22). Jia further discloses connecting, via the second battery pack interface (23), a second secondary winding (13) to the second battery pack interface (23). Jia further discloses receiving, via the second secondary winding (13), power from the primary winding (11). Jia further discloses generating, via the second secondary winding (13), a second nominal charging voltage (“VLV”) for supply to the second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”) when the second battery pack is connected to the second battery pack interface (23). Though Jia discloses connecting to each battery pack via the battery pack interfaces, Jia does not disclose receiving each battery pack via the battery pack interfaces. Jia further does not disclose “the second battery pack interface being different than the first battery pack interface”, though it is implied because the two interfaces are intended for batteries of different voltages. Shirazi teaches receiving, via a first battery pack interface (“first recess 110”; Fig. 1A), a first battery pack (“first-type of battery pack”, not drawn; ¶ [61]: “110 on the housing 105 to receive a first-type of battery pack”). Shirazi further teaches receiving, via a second battery pack interface (“second recess 115”; Fig. 1A), a second battery pack (“second-type of battery pack”, not drawn; ¶ [61]: “115 on the housing to receive a second-type of battery pack”). Shirazi further teaches the second battery pack interface (115) being different (Fig. 1A shows visually different structures) than the first battery pack interface (110). Shirazi further teaches the mechanical structures of the battery pack interfaces to enable them to receive real-world power tool battery packs of different voltages (¶ [24]). Shirazi’s structure is particularly suitable as a mechanical embodiment for Jia’s charger, which is intended for batteries of different voltages (Jia ¶ [29, 33]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the method and associated battery pack interfaces disclosed by Jia to receive the battery packs using the mechanical structures taught by Shirazi, to enable the charger to receive real-world power tool battery packs of different voltages. Regarding Claim 11, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the method of claim 10. Jia further discloses receiving, via a controller, a signal (any of “IS1”, “I_HV”, “I_LV”, “V_HV”, or “V_LV”) from a sensor (Fig. 4A shows current sensors to detect “IS1”, “I_HV”, and “I_LV”; Fig. 4A also shows voltage sensors to detect “V_HV” and “V_LV”) indicative of a characteristic (current or voltage) of at least one selected from a group consisting of the first secondary winding (“IS1”, “I_HV”, and “V_HV” are indicative of the first secondary winding “12”) and the second secondary winding (“I_LV” and “V_LV” are indicative of the second secondary winding “13”). Jia further discloses controlling, via the controller (60), the primary driver circuit (via “S Control Signal”; Fig. 4A) based on the signal (each of “IS1”, “I_HV”, “I_LV”, “V_HV”, and “V_LV” is considered in the control scheme of “60”). Regarding Claim 12, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the method of claim 10. NOTE: See the annotated Jia Fig. 4A, included supra in claim 4’s rejection. Jia further discloses the charger (100) further comprising a first charger control circuit (“second conversion circuit 32” with supporting control features from “driving” and “60”; Fig. 4A), the method further comprising the following. Jia further discloses determining, via the first charger control circuit (“32”, “driving”, “60”), a first output voltage (“VCD”; Figs. 4A, 4B; determined via sensing and controlling “VHV” via control of switches “S5-S8”; Fig. 4B shows “VCD” is either “+VHV” or “-VHV”, depending on the states of “S5-S8”) of the first secondary winding (12). Jia further discloses regulating, via the first charger control circuit (“32”, “driving”, “60”) and in response to the first output voltage (VCD), the first nominal charging voltage (VHV). Regarding Claim 13, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the method of claim 12. NOTE: See the annotated Jia Fig. 4A, included supra in claim 4’s rejection. Jia further discloses the charger (100) further includes a second charger control circuit (“third conversion circuit 33” with supporting control features from “driving” and “60”; Fig. 4A), the method further comprising the following. Jia further discloses determining, via the second charger control circuit (“33”, “driving”, “60”), a second output voltage (“VEF”; Figs. 4A, 4B; determined via sensing and controlling “VLV” via control of switches “S9-S12”; Fig. 4B shows “VEF” is either “+VLV” or “-VLV”, depending on the states of “S9-S12”) of the second secondary winding (13). Jia further discloses regulating, via the second charger control circuit (“33”, “driving”, “60”) and in response to the second output voltage (VEF), the second nominal charging voltage (VLV). Regarding Claim 14, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the method of claim 10. NOTE: See the annotated Jia Fig. 4A, included supra in claim 4’s rejection. Jia further discloses the charger (100) further includes a current sensor (Fig. 4A shows a first current sensor “current detection” connected to “12” through “32”) connected to the first secondary winding (12). Jia further discloses the charger (100) further includes a current sensor (Fig. 4A shows a second current sensor “current detection” connected to “13” through “33”) connected to the second secondary winding (13). Claims 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jia et al. (US 2022/0045619 A1) in view of Shirazi et al. (US 2023/0116349 A1) and the Maxim Integrated data sheet (MAX9621, 02/2020, Maxim Integrated, 19-5024, Rev. 2) (hereinafter “Maxim”). Regarding Claim 15, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the method of claim 14. NOTE: See the annotated Jia Fig. 4A, included supra in claim 4’s rejection. Jia further discloses sensing, via the first current sensor (see annotated Fig. 4A), a first charging current (“I_HV”; Fig. 4A) supplied to the first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses sensing, via the second current sensor (see annotated Fig. 4A), a second charging current (“I_LV”; Fig. 4A) supplied to the second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”). Jia does not disclose the two charging currents are sensed by a single current sensor. Instead, Jia discloses a first current sensor and a second current sensor. Maxim teaches a first current sensor and a second current sensor can be combined into a single current sensor (page 1, General Description: “MAX9621 provides a single-chip solution to interface two 2-wire Hall-effect sensors to low-voltage microprocessors”). Maxim further teaches the dual current sensor is advantageous for its small size (3mm x 5mm) in a single device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the two current sensors disclosed by the combination of Jia and Shirazi to be integrated into a single current sensor, as taught by Maxim, to optimize the charger design for a small size, which is more convenient for the user to handle. Regarding Claim 16, the combination of Jia, Shirazi, and Maxim teaches the method of claim 15. Jia further discloses (see detailed claim item mapping in the rejection of similar claim 8, included supra) the first secondary winding generates the first nominal charging voltage based on the first charging current, and wherein the second secondary winding generates the second nominal charging voltage based on the second charging current. Claims 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jia et al. (US 2022/0045619 A1) in view of Shirazi et al. (US 2023/0116349 A1). Regarding Claim 17, Jia discloses (see annotated Fig. 2, included supra in claim 1’s rejection) a charger (“charging and discharging device 100”; generic embodiment of Fig. 2, with various specific embodiments drawn in Figs. 3, 4A, 5-9) comprising the following features. Jia further discloses a battery pack interface (combo of “22” and “23”) configured to connect to a first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”) having a first battery pack interface (“second port 22”; ¶ [33]: “22 … may be electrically connected to a high-voltage battery”) and connect to a second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”) having a second battery pack interface (“third port 23”; ¶ [33]: “23 … may be electrically connected to a low-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses a primary driver circuit (combo of “first conversion circuit 31”, “first controllable switch 40”, “first resonance circuit 51”, and “primary winding 11”; generic embodiment of Fig. 2, with various specific embodiments drawn in Figs. 3, 4A, 5-9) for receiving power from an external power supply (“first charging and discharging unit” connected to “first port 21” per ¶ [32]). Jia further discloses the primary driver circuit (11, 31, 40, 51) including a primary winding (“primary winding 11” of “transformer 10”). Jia further discloses that in response to the battery pack interface (22, 23) connecting to the first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”), a first secondary winding (“secondary winding 12” of “transformer 10”) is connected to the first battery pack interface (22) for receiving power from the primary winding (11) and generating a first nominal charging voltage (“VHV”) for supply to the first battery pack (“high-voltage battery”). Jia further discloses that in response to the battery pack interface (22, 23) connecting to the second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”), a second secondary winding (“secondary winding 13” of “transformer 10”) is connected to the second battery pack interface (23) for receiving power from the primary winding (11) and generating a second nominal charging voltage (“VLV”) for supply to the second battery pack (“low-voltage battery”). Though Jia discloses the battery pack interface is configured to connect to the battery packs, Jia does not disclose the battery pack interface is configured to receive the battery packs. Jia further does not disclose “the second battery pack interface being different than the first battery pack interface”, though it is implied because the two interfaces are intended for batteries of different voltages. Shirazi teaches (see annotated Fig. 1A, included supra in claim 1’s rejection) a battery pack interface (combo of “110” and “115”; Fig. 1A) configured to receive a first battery pack (“first-type of battery pack”, not drawn; ¶ [61]: “110 on the housing 105 to receive a first-type of battery pack”) having a first battery pack interface (“first recess 110”; Fig. 1A) and receive a second battery pack (“second-type of battery pack”, not drawn; ¶ [61]: “115 on the housing to receive a second-type of battery pack”) having a second battery pack interface (“second recess 115”; Fig. 1A). Shirazi further teaches the second battery pack interface (115) being different (Fig. 1A shows visually different structures) than the first battery pack interface (110). Shirazi further teaches the mechanical structure of the battery pack interface to enable it to receive real-world power tool battery packs of different voltages (¶ [24]). Shirazi’s structure is particularly suitable as a mechanical embodiment for Jia’s charger, which is intended for batteries of different voltages (Jia ¶ [29, 33]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the battery pack interface disclosed by Jia be embodied by the mechanical structure taught by Shirazi, to enable the charger to receive real-world power tool battery packs of different voltages. Regarding Claim 18, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 17. Jia further discloses (see detailed claim item mapping in the rejection of similar claim 2, included supra) the charger further comprising a controller and a sensor. Regarding Claim 19, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 18. Jia further discloses (see detailed claim item mapping in the rejection of similar claim 3, included supra) the controller is configured to: receive a signal from the sensor indicative of a characteristic of at least one selected from a group consisting of the first secondary winding and the second secondary winding, and control the primary driver circuit based on the signal. Regarding Claim 20, the combination of Jia and Shirazi teaches the charger of claim 17. Jia further discloses (see detailed claim item mapping in the rejection of similar claim 4, included supra) the charger further comprising a first charger control circuit configured to: determine a first output voltage of the first secondary winding; and regulate, in response to the first output voltage, the first nominal charging voltage. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Daniel P McFarland whose telephone number is (571)272-5952. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:30 AM - 4:00 PM Eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL P MCFARLAND/ Examiner, Art Unit 2859 /DREW A DUNN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 12, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12534119
STACKABLE CHARGING DEVICE FOR SHOPPING CARTS WITH ONBOARD COMPUTING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 1 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
-50%
With Interview (-100.0%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month