Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/299,880

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MATCHING 2D HUMAN POSES FROM MULTIPLE VIEWS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 13, 2023
Priority
Mar 20, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTIB2020052609 +1 more
Examiner
CESE, KENNY A
Art Unit
2663
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hinge Health Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
521 granted / 692 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
738
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
92.2%
+52.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 692 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant's response to the last Office Action, filed on 9/10/2025 has been entered and made of record. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1, 9, 15, and 21 have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 9, 15, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The dependent claims 2, 4-7, 10-12, 14, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are rejected based on their dependency. The following claims 1, 9, 15, and 21 highlighted elements are vague and indefinite because the correspondence of the term “deviation” is not clear; “deviation of an attribute of a first three-dimensional skeleton formed from that pair of skeletons from an average human”. The following claims 1, 9, 15, and 21 highlighted elements are vague and indefinite. It is not clear what is “that pair”; “deviation of an attribute of a first three-dimensional skeleton formed from that pair of skeletons from an average human”. The following claims 9, 15, and 21 highlighted elements are vague and indefinite. It is not clear what is “the measures”. There is a lack of antecedent basis for “the measures”; Claim 9 “(ii) identifying, for each of the first skeletons, a matching one of the second skeletons based on the measures;”. Claim 15 “identifying, based on the measures, a matching one of the multiple skeletons in the second view for each of the multiple skeletons in the first view,”. Claim 21 “identifying, based on the measures, a matching one of the multiple skeletons in the second view for each of the multiple skeletons in the first view,”. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNY A CESE whose telephone number is (571) 270-1896. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday, 9am – 4pm. If attempts to reach the primary examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gregory Morse can be reached on (571) 272-3838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kenny A Cese/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 13, 2023
Application Filed
May 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 10, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 30, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633495
SEM IMAGE ENHANCEMENT METHODS AND SYSTEMS
6y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631783
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MULTI-LANE ELEVATED BODY TEMPERATURE PREVENTATIVE SCANNING SOLUTION USING GIGE VISION AND TRACKING
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626529
CHARACTER DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND CHARACTER DETERMINATION METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620106
MRI-BASED TEXTURAL ANALYSIS OF TRABECULAR BONE
3y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12602794
METHOD AND UNIFIED FRAMEWORK SYSTEM FOR FULL-STACK AUTONOMOUS DRIVING PLANNING
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+10.4%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 692 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month