Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/300,711

VOLTAGE-ISOLATED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGES WITH BACK-SIDE TRANSFORMERS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 14, 2023
Examiner
MOVVA, AMAR
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Allegro MicroSystems, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
606 granted / 764 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
782
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 764 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II (claims 1-31) in the reply filed on 12-1-2015 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-9, 13-14, 22 and 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tang (US 2022/0028593). [claim 1] A chip package (fig. 23, 23A, 23B, 23C ) for a galvanically isolated integrated circuits (ICs), the chip package comprising: a lead frame (lead frame structure as shown in fig. 23 which including but not limited to the die attach pads 2304/2308, leads 2310 in multilevel substrate 2307, fig. 23/23A and the conductive leads attached to die attach pads, [0046]) with first and second sides (top and bottom sides of fig. 23); first and second semiconductor dies (2306/2302, fig. 23, [0046]) disposed on the first side of the lead frame; a molding material (2320, fig. 23, [0051]) configured to cover a portion of the lead frame and forming a package body; a ferromagnetic core (2314/2321, fig. 23, [0052]) disposed in the package body adjacent the second side of the lead frame; and first and second coils (2311/2309, fig. 23, [0052]) disposed in the package body about the ferromagnetic core in a transformer configuration [0052], each coil including a plurality of windings [0052]; wherein the first and second coils and ferromagnetic core are disposed within the package body on the second side of the lead frame (fig. 23, 23A), opposite to the first side. [claim 2] The chip package of claim 1, further comprising first (2308, fig. 23, [0048]) and second (2304, fig. 23, [0048]) die pads, wherein the first and second semiconductor dies are disposed on first and second die pads, respectively. [claim 3] The chip package of claim 2, wherein the first and/or second die comprises an integrated circuit [0047][0048]. [claim 5] The chip package of claim 1, further comprising an insulator material disposed between the first and second coils (the package body 2320 in which the coils are embedded and are separated as it fills is the void may be made of plastic which is an insulator, [0051]). [claim 6] A chip package (fig. 23, 23A, 23B, 23C ) comprising: a lead frame (lead frame structure as shown in fig. 23 which including but not limited to the die attach pads 2304/2308, leads 2310 in multilevel substrate 2307, fig. 23/23A and the conductive leads attached to die attach pads, [0046]) having first and second sides (top and bottom sides of fig. 23) and configured to receive first and second semiconductor dies on the first side (fig. 23); a package body (2320, fig. 23, [0051]) including molding material and configured to cover a portion the lead frame; a transformer core (2314/2321, fig. 23, [0052]) disposed in the package body on the second side of the lead frame; and first and second coils (2311/2309, fig. 23, [0052]) having windings disposed about the transformer core in a transformer configuration [0052] and disposed in the package body; wherein the first and second coils and transformer core are disposed on the second side of the lead frame (fig. 23), opposite to the first side. [claim 7] The chip package of claim 6, further comprising first and second semiconductor dies disposed on the first side of the lead frame (fig. 23). [claim 8] The chip package of claim 7, wherein the first and second coils are configured to magnetically couple the first and second semiconductor dies [0055]. [claim 9] The chip package of claim 8, wherein the first and second semiconductor dies comprise first and second integrated circuits, respectively [0047][0048]. [claim 13] The chip package of claim 7, further comprising first (2308, fig. 23, [0048]) and second (2304, fig. 23, [0048]) die pads disposed on the first side of the lead frame and configured to receive the first and second semiconductor dies, respectively. [claim 14] The chip package of claim 6, wherein the lead frame comprises a partially etched lead frame (the structure of the lead frame of fig. 23 may be the result of an etching process). [claim 22] The chip package of claim 7, further comprising a first plurality of wire (2346, fig. 23, [0048] on the left upper side of fig. 23) bonds connecting the lead frame to the first semiconductor die. [claim 23] The chip package of claim 22, further comprising a second plurality of wire bonds (2346, fig. 23, [0048] on the right lower side of fig. 23) connecting the lead frame to the second semiconductor die. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tang (US 2022/0028593). Tang discloses the chip package of claim 6 but does not expressly disclose that the shortest distance between first and second conductive portions of the lead frame is at least 8 mm. Nevertheless it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill before the time of filing to have made the shortest distance between first and second conductive portions of the lead frame at least 8 mm , since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in prior art, discovering the optimum or working ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. It also been held that the normal desire of scientists or artisans to improve upon what is already generally known provides the motivation to determine where in a disclosed set of percentage ranges is the optimum combination of percentages. In re Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2003). The claimed range is a result-effective variable since the amount of spacing between the first and second conductive portions would affect how much space the overall device takes up. Claim(s) 24-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tang (US 2022/0028593). Tang discloses the chip package of claim 23 but does not expressly disclose that a shortest distance between the first and second pluralities of wire bonds is at least 8 mm. Nevertheless it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill before the time of filing to have made the shortest distance between the first and second pluralities of wire bonds at least 8 mm, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in prior art, discovering the optimum or working ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. It also been held that the normal desire of scientists or artisans to improve upon what is already generally known provides the motivation to determine where in a disclosed set of percentage ranges is the optimum combination of percentages. In re Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2003). The claimed range is a result-effective variable since the amount of spacing between the first and second pluralities of wire bonds would affect how much space the overall device takes up. Claim(s) 4, 10-12, and 31 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tang (US 2022/0028593) in view of Vinciarelli (US 6,107,860). Tang discloses the chip package of claims 3 and 9 but does not expressly that the integrated circuit comprises a gate driver circuit. Vinciarelli discloses a chip package wherein the integrated circuit comprises a gate driver circuit (200, fig. 9a, 602, fig. 15, lines 50-56, col. 16 & lines 55-67, col. 13) in a die which drives a transformer (204, fig. 9a, lines 55-67, col. 13). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time of filing to have the integrated circuit comprises a gate driver circuit in a die in order to provide a means to drive the transformer. With this modification Tang discloses: [claim 4] The chip package of claim 3, wherein the integrated circuit comprises a gate driver circuit (upon modification). [claim 10] The chip package of claim 9, wherein the first or second integrated circuit comprises a gate driver (upon modification). [claim 11] The chip package of claim 10, wherein the gate driver is configured to receive power from the transformer (via 250 in fig. 9a, Vinciarelli, lines 35-39, col. 9). [claim 12] The chip package of claim 10, wherein the gate driver is configured to receive control signals from the transformer (via 254 in fig. 9a, Vinciarelli, lines 35-39, col. 9). [claim 31] The chip package of claim 9, wherein the first or second integrated circuit comprises a gate driver (upon modification). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMAR MOVVA whose telephone number is (571)272-9009. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at 571-272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMAR MOVVA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 14, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 03, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598743
MEMORY CELL, NONVOLATILE SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING NONVOLATILE SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12599035
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588257
2D LAYERED GATE OXIDE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581648
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581645
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.1%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 764 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month