Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/300,785

Heat Shield for Temperature Sensing Pan

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 14, 2023
Priority
Dec 30, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022143985
Examiner
JENNISON, BRIAN W
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sharkninja Operating LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
1058 granted / 1472 resolved
+1.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1534
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1472 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/17/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Magnouloux et al is used to show the amended limitations. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 14-27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al (CN 108378678) in view of Magnouloux et al (US 2017/0099990. Regarding claim 14, Li discloses, A cooking pan (See Fig 1, Pan, or Pot), comprising: a pan body comprising a cooking surface and a heating surface opposite the cooking surface (Fig 1 shows a pan body 4 having a cooking surface and a heating surface at 44, Fig 6, opposite the cooking surface); a handle coupled to the pan body (Handle 62 is coupled to the pan body at 43 via a side lug, See Paragraph [0042], [0045]); a thermal probe extending between the pan body and the handle (thermal probe 5 extends from the handle 62 to the pan body 4. See Paragraph [0038], [0044]); and a shield surrounding at least a portion of the thermal probe, the shield arranged to block the thermal probe from at least one of radiant heat and impacts. (Cast aluminum cover 61 surrounds at least a portion of the thermal probe 5 and is insulated for blocking radiant heat. The cast aluminum material would also protect against impacts. See Paragraphs [0011], [0038], [0045]) Li fails to disclose the shield being coupled to the thermal probe by a spring member. However, Magnouloux discloses a cooking pan having a pan body, cooking surface and heating surface with a thermal probe 30, including conducting elements 31 and 32 extending between the pan body and handle as shown in Figs 1-2. The probe is encased in a sheath 33. (See Fig 3 and Paragraph [0050]) The spring members 46a and 46b retain the sheath 33 to the support 40, which is considered the shield. (See Paragraph [0052]) It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to adapt Li in view of Magnouloux to provide the shield being coupled to the thermal probe by a spring member for retaining the probe inside the shield or support surface and prevent movement. Li discloses regarding claim 15, Fig 1 shows the thermal probe 5 having a curved portion and the shield or cover 61 forming a boot with upper and lower portions extending at an angle relative to each other, matching the curve of the probe 5. Regarding claim 16, Fig 8 clearly shows the cover 61 having upper lateral sides and the lower portion has an elongated extension extending to the pan body. (“The heat shield 61 to be matched with the pot 4 peripheral radian of the arc structure” See Paragraph [0045]) Regarding claim 17, element 43 contains a recess which is received via 613 of the shield or cover 61, See Figs 1, 9. Regarding claim 18, The figures show the shield 61 attached to the handle 62. Regarding claim 19, temperature sensing gauge/head 52 is mounted in the handle and coupled to the thermal probe and indicates the temperature of the pan body. (See Paragraphs [0045], [0046], [0059]) Regarding claim 21, Figs 1 and 8 show the shield being a single piece. Regarding claim 21, radial slot functions as a hole for inserting the probe 5 into the pan bottom. (See Figs 6 and Paragraph [0044]) Regarding claim 22, the grasping portion, attachment portion and lower surface of the attachment portion to the heating surface of the pan body are shown in Figs 1-8. Li discloses, regarding claim 23, A cooking pan, comprising: a pan body having a base portion with an upper cooking surface and a lower heating surface, and a sidewall extending upward from the base portion (Fig 1 shows a pan body 4 having a cooking surface and a heating surface at 44, Fig 6, opposite the cooking surface with a sidewall extending upward from the base); a handle having an attachment portion coupled to the sidewall of the pan body and an elongate grasping portion extending outward from the attachment portion (Handle 62 is coupled to the pan body at 43 via a side lug, See Paragraph [0042], [0045] the grasping portion, attachment portion and lower surface of the attachment portion to the heating surface of the pan body are shown in Figs 1-8); a shield positioned along the sidewall of the pan body and extending between a lower surface of the attachment portion of the handle and the lower heating surface of the pan body. (Cast aluminum cover 61 surrounds at least a portion of the thermal probe 5 and is insulated for blocking radiant heat. The cast aluminum material would also protect against impacts. See Paragraphs [0011], [0038], [0045]) Li fails to disclose the shield being coupled to the thermal probe by a spring member. However, Magnouloux discloses a cooking pan having a pan body, cooking surface and heating surface with a thermal probe 30, including conducting elements 31 and 32 extending between the pan body and handle as shown in Figs 1-2. The probe is encased in a sheath 33. (See Fig 3 and Paragraph [0050]) The spring members 46a and 46b retain the sheath 33 to the support 40, which is considered the shield. (See Paragraph [0052]) It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to adapt Li in view of Magnouloux to provide the shield being coupled to the thermal probe by a spring fastener for retaining the probe inside the shield or support surface and prevent movement. Regarding claim 24, temperature sensing gauge/head 52 is mounted in the handle and coupled to the thermal probe and indicates the temperature of the pan body. (See Paragraphs [0045], [0046], [0059]) Radial slot functions as a hole for inserting the probe 5 into the pan bottom. (See Figs 6 and Paragraph [0044]) Regarding claim 25, Cast aluminum cover 61 surrounds at least a portion of the thermal probe 5 and is insulated for blocking radiant heat. The cast aluminum material would also protect against impacts. (See Paragraphs [0011], [0038], [0045]) Fig 1 shows the thermal probe 5 having a curved portion and the shield or cover 61 forming a boot with upper and lower portions extending at an angle relative to each other, matching the curve of the probe 5. Fig 8 clearly shows the cover 61 having upper lateral sides and the lower portion has an elongated extension extending to the pan body. Regarding claim 26, radial slot functions as a hole for inserting the probe 5 into the pan bottom. (See Figs 6 and Paragraph [0044]) Regarding claim 27, Fig 8 clearly shows the cover 61 having upper lateral sides and the lower portion has an elongated extension, defining a hollow cavity, extending to the pan body. Claim(s) 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al (CN 108378678) in view of Magnouloux et al (US 2017/0099990) and Cheng et al (US 2017/0231415). The teachings of Li have been discussed above. Li fails to disclose the pan is riveted to the body…handle? Cheng discloses a pan having a handle with a thermal probe. The handle is riveted to the body. (See Paragraph [0063]) It would have been obvious to adapt Li in view of Cheng to provide the riveting as this is an obvious variant for securing parts of a pan together. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN W JENNISON whose telephone number is (571)270-5930. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ibrahime Abraham can be reached at 571-270-5569. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN W JENNISON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761 9/29/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 17, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766624
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FUEL FILL DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED VENTING FOR ATTACHMENT TO FUEL TANK
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766645
FLOATING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A TOOL
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766641
Housing for a Laser Processing Machine and Laser Processing Machine Having a Housing
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759070
WELDING GUN WITH A DISPLACEMENT MEASURING SYSTEM
4y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759091
METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DETERMINING THE PERFORMANCE OF A WELDING METHOD VIA DIGITAL PROCESSING OF AN IMAGE OF THE WELDED WORKPIECE
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+22.2%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1472 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month