Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/300,948

Method And Installation For Manufacturing A Starting Material For Producing Rare Earth Magnets

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 14, 2023
Priority
Jul 19, 2017 — DE 10 2017 116 272.0 +1 more
Examiner
BURKMAN, JESSICA LYNN
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Netzsch Trockenmahltechnik GmbH
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
176 granted / 213 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
236
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 213 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is a response to an amendment filed May 11th, 2026.By the amendment claims 11, 13, 15, and 19 are pending with claim 11 being amended. Unless otherwise stated the applicant’s amendments have overcome all objections and 35 U.S.C 112 rejections as outlined in the pervious Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 11, 13 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kerns et al. (US 8662427), hereafter Kerns. With regards to claim 11 Kerns discloses an installation for producing a powdered starting material provided for manufacturing rare earth magnets (Abstract; See MPEP 2115 ), comprising at least one dynamic classifier (106) having a feed inlet configured to receive a powdered intermediate product (Col. 12, L22) which includes at least one rare earth metal obtained from pulverizing (Col. 11, L40-44) an alloy, the at least one dynamic classifier being configured to separate a fraction from the powdered intermediate product by means of at least two classifications that follow one another in time (Col. 12, L26-31), each directed at particle size and/or particle density (Col. 11 L, wherein the at least one dynamic classifier separates coarse material from the powdered intermediate product (Col. 12, L26-29) as part of a first classification of said at least two classifications and separates fine material from the powdered intermediate product as part of a second classification of said at least two classifications (Col. 12, L30-31), the at least one dynamic classifier having a classifying rotor (Col. 12, L19-20), the at least one dynamic classifier being configured to disperse the fraction fine material within the same at least one dynamic classifier to establish a homogenous distribution of particles in the fraction fine material (Col.12, L10-14) and perform a renewed classification within the same at least one dynamic classifier to separate a further fraction from the dispersed fraction fine material (Col. 12, L29-30), said further fraction forming a starting material used to manufacture rare earth magnets. With regards to claim 13, Kerns discloses all the elements of claim 11 as outlined above. Kerns further discloses wherein the at least one dynamic classifier is formed for classifying and dispersing the powdered intermediate product supplied (Col. 12, L10-14) With regards to claim 15, Kerns discloses all the elements of claim 11 as outlined above. Kerns further discloses wherein the at least one dynamic classifier performs at least one of the at least two classifications directed at particle size and/or density (Col. 11, L45-47) under a protective gas atmosphere (Col. 12, L17-19; air is a protective gas). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kerns. With regards to claim 19, Kerns discloses all the elements of claim 11 as outlined above. Kerns does not directly disclose wherein the at least one dynamic classifier comprising the at least one dynamic classifier provides for the starting material to include a fraction of particles >8 µm in an amount <2 volume percent and/or a fraction of particles <2 pm in an amount 2 volume percent. However, Kerns discloses the starting material to include a fraction of particles >5 µm in an amount <5 volume percent (Col. 11, L25-37) and that this device can be used to separate nanometer size particles (Col. 10, L13-15). Therefore, this is routine optimization and rendered obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention based on what the final product is being used for (MPEP2145.05.II.A) Response to Arguments The applicant’s arguments with respect to the Guenther reference are rendered moot. New grounds of rejection are presented above. The applicant’s arguments with respect to the substantial duplicate claim are persuasive. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA LYNN BURKMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5824. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30am to 6:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at (571)272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.L.B./Examiner, Art Unit 3653 /MICHAEL MCCULLOUGH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 11, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12693237
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EXAMINING CONTAINERS FOR IMPURITIES
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686110
SUBSTRATE TRANSFER DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680263
Miniloader
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673351
AUTOMATED PROCESS AND METHOD FOR MATERIAL SEPARATION AND RECYCLING
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667864
DEVICE FOR SEPARATING FEED MATERIAL
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 213 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month