Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/301,291

CARRIER FOR SECURING FABRICATED WAFERS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 17, 2023
Examiner
WILSON, LEE D
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ciena Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

80%
Career Allow Rate
1457 granted / 1823 resolved
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 pending
1857
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§102
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 2-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. The wafer is not positively recited as part of the invention which means to modify the wafer is to not further limit the invention. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Li et al 12220730. Li et al disclose the claimed invention as recited in the claims as shown below: 1. An apparatus for securing a wafer (this is the workpiece which is not part of the invention.), the wafer having a first side comprising a plurality of fabricated structure regions and a second side that has at least one region that is exposed for fabrication when the wafer is secured, the apparatus comprising: a carrier base 10 configured to receive the wafer, the carrier base comprising one or more alignment features 50 for aligning the wafer to the carrier base; and a plurality of support structures 20 arranged on the carrier base, where three or more of the support structures are each configured to contact the first side of the wafer when the wafer is secured to the carrier base, and arranged on the carrier base to contact the first side of the wafer at a location on the first side of the wafer that is between at least two of the plurality of fabricated structure regions. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Walker 6672576. Walker discloses the claimed invention as recited in the claims as shown below: 1. An apparatus for securing a wafer (this is the workpiece which is not part of the invention.),, the wafer having a first side comprising a plurality of fabricated structure regions and a second side that has at least one region that is exposed for fabrication when the wafer is secured, the apparatus comprising: a carrier base 40 configured to receive the wafer, the carrier base comprising one or more alignment features 60 for aligning the wafer to the carrier base; and a plurality of support structures 10 arranged on the carrier base, where three or more of the support structures are each configured to contact the first side of the wafer when the wafer is secured to the carrier base, and arranged on the carrier base to contact the first side of the wafer at a location on the first side of the wafer that is between at least two of the plurality of fabricated structure regions. wafer is secured to the carrier base. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15-20 are allowed. Method teaches a specific wafer and specific holder which is neither recited nor rendered obvious by the prior art because this specific wafer has structure that works and is configured with the holder. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The 892 form discloses prior art being made of record. . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEE D WILSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4499. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6;30-4;30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN KELLER can be reached at 571-272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEE D. WILSON Examiner Art Unit 3723 Ldw /LEE D WILSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723 January 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12595849
SEAL RING INSTALLATION MODULE AND SEAL RING INSTALLATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589976
LIFTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583068
Clamping Arrangement
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564923
MOUNTING TOOL FOR POSITIONING A SHAFT SEALING RING ON A SHAFT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SHAFT SEAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559959
HYDRAULIC LIFT CAISSON FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER HEAVY AND/OR LARGE OBJECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1823 resolved cases by this examiner