Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/303,732

GUIDEWIRE LOCKING DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 20, 2023
Examiner
DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Gyrus ACMI, Inc. D/B/A Olympus Surgical Technologies America
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
701 granted / 932 resolved
+5.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
63 currently pending
Career history
995
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 932 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-3 and 6-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 6-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20040162465 A1 to Carrillio. Regarding Claim 1, Carrillio discloses a medical device comprising inter alia: a body (192) defining an opening through which a wire is extendible (space within 192, FIG. 12); an upper wire guiding portion (labeled “upper” in annotated FIG. 12) having a first surface (surface labeled “1st” surface of “upper” portion that forms part of slot 304 in annotated FIG. 12) and a second surface opposite to the first surface (surface labeled “2nd” surface of “upper” portion in annotated FIG. 12); a lower wire guiding portion (labeled “lower” in annotated FIG. 12) coupled with the body (via 208), the lower wire guiding portion having a first surface (surface labeled “1st” surface of “lower” portion in annotated FIG. 12) and a second surface opposite the lower wire guiding portion first surface (surface labeled “2nd” surface of “lower” portion that forms part of slot 304 in annotated FIG. 12), wherein the lower wire guiding portion first surface faces the upper wire guiding portion second surface (the “1st” surface of the “lower” portion faces in the generally direction of the “2nd” surface of the “upper” portion”); a plurality of wire locking features, wherein a first wire locking feature of the plurality of locking features is disposed on the upper wire guiding portion second surface and a second wire locking feature of the plurality of locking features is disposed on the lower wire guiding portion second surface (the locking features in both the upper and lower portions, are located in and formed by both the 1st and 2nd surfaces of both the upper and lower portions); and a wire contacting feature (250) extending from the upper wire guiding portion second surface toward the lower wire guiding portion first surface (250 extends from the 2nd surface of the upper portion generally in the direction of and “towards” the first surface of the lower portion), the wire contacting feature configured to contact the wire to bias the wire toward the upper wire guiding portion second surface (see FIG. 12). PNG media_image1.png 591 673 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2, Carrillio discloses wherein at least one of the plurality of wire locking features is configured to provide an audible or haptic indication in response to a guidewire being placed in contact therewith during insertion of the wire (the locking features are surfaces are capable of being an audible noise when a guidewire is tapped against the locking features). Regarding Claim 3, Carrillio discloses wherein each of the plurality of wire locking features includes a slot that is aligned with an axis and a well, wherein the slot includes a tapered wall that extends towards the axis and the well (see below in annotated FIG. 12). PNG media_image2.png 344 440 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claims 6 and 7, Carrillio discloses wherein a channel is defined between the upper wire guiding portion and the lower wire guiding portion, wherein the channel extends along a center axis that is substantially perpendicular to a center axis that the opening extends along (see horizontal axis of the “channel” that is perpendicular to vertical center axis of opening in 192 in annotated FIG. 12). PNG media_image3.png 479 359 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 8, Carrillio discloses wherein the medical device comprises a cap through which the wire is extendible (cap on top of 192, FIG. 12). Regarding Claim 9, Carrillio discloses wherein the cap comprises an opening (opening in cap on top of 192) and the body comprises a barb that is configured to engage the cap opening to connect the cap and the body (arced connector that attaches 192 to cap, FIG. 12). Regarding Claim 10, Carrillio discloses wherein the plurality of wire locking features are arranged where two of the plurality of wire locking features are at the upper wire guiding portion and one of the plurality of wire locking features is at the lower wire guiding portion (there are a total of 4 wire locking features, 2 at each of the upper and lower guiding portions). Regarding Claim 11, Carrillio discloses a medical device comprising inter alia: a body (192) defining an opening through which a wire is extendible (space within 192, FIG. 12); a wire guiding portion having an upper portion (labeled “upper” in annotated FIG. 12) and a lower portion (labeled “lower” in annotated FIG. 12), the wire guiding portion being coupled with the body (via 208), the wire guiding portion configured to guide the wire along an axis (see guidewires being guided by wire guiding portions in FIG. 12); PNG media_image1.png 591 673 media_image1.png Greyscale at least two wire locking features configured to hook the wire at the wire guiding portion (labeled above in annotated FIG. 12), the at least two wire locking features each comprising a slot extending in opposite direction along a slot axis substantially perpendicular to the axis (see horizontal axis of “channel” that is perpendicular to vertical axis of opening in 192 in annotated FIG. 12); PNG media_image3.png 479 359 media_image3.png Greyscale and a wire contacting feature (250) extending from the wire guiding upper portion toward the wire guiding lower portion (250 extends from the 2nd surface of the upper portion generally in the direction of and “towards” the first surface of the lower portion), the wire contacting feature configured to contact the wire to bias the wire toward the wire guiding portion (see FIG. 12). Regarding Claim 12, Carrillio discloses wherein the at least two wire locking features each comprise a well and the slot includes a tapered wall that extends towards the slot axis and the well (see below in annotated FIG. 12). PNG media_image2.png 344 440 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 13, Carrillio discloses wherein at least one of the at least two wire locking features is configured to provide a tactile feedback of the wire being engaged in each of the at least two wire locking features (the locking features are surfaces are capable of being an audible noise when a guidewire is tapped against the locking features). Regarding Claim 14, Carillio discloses where the wire guiding upper portion has a first surface (surface labeled “1st” surface of “upper” portion that forms part of slot 304 in annotated FIG. 12) and a second surface opposite the first surface (surface labeled “2nd” surface of “upper” portion in annotated FIG. 12) and the wire guiding lower portion is coupled with the body (via 208), the wire guiding lower portion having a first surface (surface labeled “1st” surface of “lower” portion in annotated FIG. 12) and a second surface (surface labeled “2nd” surface of “lower” portion that forms part of slot 304 in annotated FIG. 12 opposite to the wire guiding lower portion first surface, where the wire guiding lower portion first surface faces the wire guiding upper portion second surface (the “1st” surface of the “lower” portion faces in the generally direction of the “2nd” surface of the “upper” portion”). Regarding Claim 15, Carrillo discloses wherein a first of the at least two wire locking features is disposed at the wire guiding upper portion and a second of the at least two wire locking features is disposed on the wire guiding lower portion (there are a total of 4 wire locking features, 2 at each of the upper and lower guiding portions). Regarding Claim 16, Carrillo discloses the medical device of claim 15, wherein the first of the at least two wire locking features is disposed at the wire guiding upper portion second surface and the second of the at least two wire locking features is disposed on the wire guiding lower portion second surface (the locking features in both the upper and lower portions, are located in and formed by both the 1st and 2nd surfaces of both the upper and lower portions). Regarding Claim 17, Carrillio discloses a wire guide for guiding a wire, the wire guide comprising inter alia: an upper wire guiding portion (labeled “upper” in annotated FIG. 12) and a having a first surface (surface labeled “1st” surface of “upper” portion that forms part of slot 304 in annotated FIG. 12) and a second surface opposite to the first surface (surface labeled “2nd” surface of “upper” portion in annotated FIG. 12); a lower wire guiding portion (labeled “lower” in annotated FIG. 12) opposite the upper wire guiding portion, the lower wire guiding portion having a first surface (surface labeled “1st” surface of “lower” portion in annotated FIG. 12) and a second surface (surface labeled “2nd” surface of “lower” portion that forms part of slot 304 in annotated FIG. 12) opposite the lower wire guiding portion first surface, wherein the lower wire guiding portion first faces the upper wire guiding portion second surface (the “1st” surface of the “lower” portion faces in the generally direction of the “2nd” surface of the “upper” portion”); a plurality of wire locking features, wherein a first wire locking feature of the plurality of locking features is disposed on the upper wire guiding portion second surface and a second wire locking feature of the plurality of locking features is disposed on the lower wire guiding portion second surface (the locking features in both the upper and lower portions, are located in and formed by both the 1st and 2nd surfaces of both the upper and lower portions); and a wire contacting feature (250) extending from the upper wire guiding portion second surface toward the lower wire guiding portion first surface (250 extends from the 2nd surface of the upper portion generally in the direction of and “towards” the first surface of the lower portion), the wire contacting feature configured to contact the wire to bias the wire toward the upper wire guiding portion second surface (see FIG. 12). PNG media_image1.png 591 673 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 18, Carrillio discloses wherein each of the plurality of wire locking features includes a slot that is aligned with an axis and a well, wherein the slot includes a tapered wall that extends towards the axis and the well (see below in annotated FIG. 12). PNG media_image2.png 344 440 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 19, Carrillio discloses wherein at least one of the plurality of wire locking features is configured to provide an audible or haptic indication in response to a guidewire being placed in contact therewith during insertion of the wire (the locking features are surfaces are capable of being an audible noise when a guidewire is tapped against the locking features). Regarding Claim 20, Carrillio discloses wherein a first of the plurality of wire locking features is disposed at the upper wire guiding portion and a second of the plurality of wire locking features is disposed on the lower guiding portion (there are a total of 4 wire locking features, 2 at each of the upper and lower guiding portions). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN PATRICK DOUGHERTY whose telephone number is (571)270-5044. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm (Pacific Time). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacqueline Cheng can be reached at (571)272-5596. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN P DOUGHERTY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 20, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599324
Systems and Methods for Phlebotomy Through a Peripheral IV Catheter
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599373
BIOPSY DEVICE HAVING A LINEAR MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588833
MONITORING A SLEEPING SUBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588845
LIQUID COLLECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588826
PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAM SENSOR ARRANGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+14.3%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 932 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month