Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/305,538

PIPE SEGMENTS, NOZZLES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THERMOSET MANUFACTURING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Examiner
SORKIN, DAVID L
Art Unit
1774
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
803 granted / 1191 resolved
+2.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
60 currently pending
Career history
1231
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1191 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claim 114 is withdrawn from consideration as being directed to the non-elected method invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 95-113 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhu (US 2022/0410094) in view of Kelley (US 2004/0125688): Regarding claim 95, Zhu discloses a system for thermoset manufacturing, comprising: a pipe segment comprising: a pipe body (22) having an exterior surface (an exterior surface of 88, which is a portion of 32), an interior surface (34), a main inlet portion (a portion including the top end of 36 as seen in Fig. 6), a main outlet portion (a portion including the bottom end of 36 as seen in Fig. 6), a secondary inlet portion (a portion including 92), and a secondary outlet portion (a portion including 94), the interior surface defining a main chamber (36) extending from the main inlet portion to the main outlet portion, and the pipe body defining a secondary chamber (90) between the exterior surface and the interior surface and extending from the secondary inlet portion to the secondary outlet portion, wherein the main inlet portion comprises a main inlet orifice (the top end of 36 as seem in Fig. 6), the main outlet portion comprises a main outlet orifice (the bottom end of 36 as seen in Fig. 6), the secondary inlet portion comprises a secondary inlet orifice, and the secondary outlet portion comprises a secondary outlet orifice; and a mixing element (42) disposed within the main chamber such that the main chamber and the mixing element form a static mixing chamber; a three-way junction (the Y-junction at the top of Fig. 6) comprising a first inlet connection, a second inlet connection, and an outlet connection, wherein the three-way junction is in fluid communication with the static mixing chamber via the outlet connection and the main inlet orifice (see Fig. 6); at least one of a thermoset resin, an epoxy resin, and a polyester resin (see [0095] and [0096]) flowing through the first inlet connection, the outlet connection, and the main inlet orifice; at least one of a thermoset hardener, an epoxy hardener, a polyester hardener, a hardener additive, and a catalyst (see [0095] and [0096]) flowing through the second inlet connection, the outlet connection, and the main inlet orifice; a heated fluid flowing through the secondary chamber via the secondary inlet orifice and the secondary outlet orifice; a mixed fluid comprising the materials flowing through the first inlet connection and the second inlet connection, the mixed fluid being disposed within the static mixing chamber; and a thermoset manufacturing station (106 or a portion thereof) in fluid communication with the main outlet orifice and configured to receive the mixed fluid discharged through the main outlet orifice, wherein the thermoset manufacturing station is configured to manufacture a thermoset product using the mixed fluid received from the main outlet orifice. However, the three-way junction is not disclosed to be a three-way “valve”. Kelley teaches a three-way junction being a valve (see [0026]). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have utilized a three-way valve as the three-way junction at taught by Kelley to facilitate flow control. Regarding claim 96, the pipe segment comprises a nozzle and the pipe body comprises a nozzle body (see Figs. 6 and 16A-16D). Regarding claim 97, though Zhu expressly discloses the pipe segment is fabricated using additive manufacturing (see [0097]), it should be note that method steps of manufacturing are not limiting in a claim to a product. Regarding claim 98, the pipe body comprises at least one of a metal, titanium, a metal alloy, steel, aluminum, an aluminum alloy, and a copper alloy (see [0094]). Regarding claim 99, the interior surface comprises a nonstick coating (see [0042]). Regarding claim 100, the nonstick coating comprises a chemical-based coating (see [0042]). Regarding claim 101, the pipe body is configured to transfer heat from the heated fluid in the secondary chamber to the materials in the static mixing chamber to maintain a predetermined mixing temperature for at least one of the materials (see [0086]-[0089]). Regarding claim 102, the secondary chamber comprises at least one path for the heated fluid, the at least one path extending from the secondary inlet orifice to the secondary outlet orifice (see [0086]-[0089]). Regarding claim 103, the at least one path comprises a spiral path extending from the secondary inlet orifice to the secondary outlet orifice (see Fig. 16B). Regarding claim 104, the at least one path comprises a plurality of paths substantially circling the main chamber, the plurality of paths being interconnected on an inlet end with an inlet routing path from the secondary inlet orifice and interconnected on an outlet end with an outlet routing path to the secondary outlet orifice (see [0087]). Regarding claim 105, the at least one path comprises a plurality of paths extending substantially longitudinally or angled longitudinally in relation to the main chamber, the plurality of paths being interconnected on an inlet end with an inlet routing path from the secondary inlet orifice and interconnected on an outlet end with an outlet routing path to the secondary outlet orifice (see [0087]). Regarding claim 106, the mixing element comprises at least one of a spiral mixing element, a helical mixing element, a baffle mixing element, and a stair-step mixing element (see Figs. 6-15). Regarding claim 107, flange (102) and the discussion of fasteners in [0043], [0044] and [0090] would have rendered the flange connection of this claim obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date. Regarding claim 108, first and second pumps are disclosed (see [0213]). It would be understood that reservoirs for the source materials are necessary. Kelley is relied up as above concerning the obviousness of providing valves for flow control. Regarding claim 109, a heater is disclosed (see [0086]), and [0044] and [0086]-[0088] render the remaining features of this claim obvious. Regarding claim 110, a temperature sensor is disclosed (see [0044]). Regarding claim 111, the disclosure of a temperature sensor in [0044] and the discussion of a heater and temperature control in [0086] would controlling the heater in the claimed manner. Regarding claim 112, the discussion of molds in [0214] would have rendered injecting a mold obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date. Regarding claim 113, the thermoset manufacturing station comprises a composite-part tool configured to receive the mixed fluid by infusion for resin infusion (see Figs. 17 and 22). Claims 109-111 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhu (US 2022/0410094) in view of Kelley (US 2004/0125688) as applied to claim 109-111 above, and further in view of Feldmeier (US 1,863,786). Though these claims are rejected as unpatentable over Zhu (US 2022/0410094) in view of Kelley (US 2004/0125688) alone above, Feldmeier is cited for conventional details of heat exchange systems, such as reservoirs (6,10), pumps (4,9), valves, heater, and heater controller (15, 17, 18, 19). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have included these conventional components to complete the system suggested in [0044] and [0086]-[0088] of Zhu. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments are mood due to all new claims and reliance upon Zhu (US 2022/0410094). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID L SORKIN whose telephone number is (571)272-1148. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Claire X Wang can be reached at (571) 270-1051. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DAVID L. SORKIN Examiner Art Unit 1774 /DAVID L SORKIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 7 earlier events
Aug 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 20, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 21, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741395
MIXER AUTONOMY MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734492
METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR MIXING A LIQUID
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728423
THAWING DEVICE FOR THAWING A MEDIUM, AND A METHOD FOR THAWING A MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722128
AXISYMMETRIC CONFINED IMPINGING JET MIXER
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12673307
TUBE HOLDER
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+12.8%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1191 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month