Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/305,538

PIPE SEGMENTS, NOZZLES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THERMOSET MANUFACTURING

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Examiner
SORKIN, DAVID L
Art Unit
1774
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
787 granted / 1170 resolved
+2.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1213
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§102
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1170 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 16-25, 27-31 and 35, in the reply filed on 21 January 2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement 37 CFR 1.98(a)(3)(i) requires “A concise explanation of the relevance, as it is presently understood by the individual designated in § 1.56(c) most knowledgeable about the content of the information, of each patent, publication, or other information listed that is not in the English language.” References for which no explanation was provided and which are not in the English language have been crossed-off on an IDS list of references. 37 CFR 1.98(b)(5) requires “Each publication listed in an information disclosure statement must be identified by publisher, author (if any), title, relevant pages of the publication, date, and place of publication.” References for which the date required by this rule was not provided have been crossed-off on the IDS listings. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4, 5, 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 4, there is lack of antecedent basis for “the secondary inlet portion of the nozzle body”. While parent claim 2 requires that the pipe body comprises a secondary inlet potion and comprises a nozzle body, this is not a requirement that the secondary inlet portion is part of the nozzle body. Likewise, there is lack of antecedent basis for “the secondary outlet portion of the nozzle body”. Similarly, in claim 5, there is lack of antecedent basis for “the main inlet portion of the nozzle”. Similarly, in claim 7, there is lack of antecedent basis for “the main inlet portion of the nozzle”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 16-25 and 27-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lehner (US 3,902,850): Regarding claim 1, Lehner discloses a pipe segment comprising a pipe body comprising an exterior surface (exterior of 26), a main inlet portion (fluid entering though 22), a main outlet portion (fluid exiting through 16), a secondary inlet portion (a portion corresponding one instance of “34”) and a secondary outlet portion (a portion corresponding to the other instance of “34”), the pipe body defining a main chamber (interior of 12) extending from the main inlet portion to the main outlet portion, the pipe body further defining a secondary chamber (32) between the exterior surface and the main chamber and extending from the secondary inlet portion to the secondary outlet portion. Regarding claim 2, the pipe segment comprises a nozzle and the pipe body comprises a nozzle body (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 4, the secondary inlet portion of the nozzle body is disposed proximate to the main inlet portion or along the exterior surface between the main inlet portion and the main outlet portion and the secondary outlet portion of the nozzle body is disposed proximate to the main inlet portion or along the exterior surface between the main inlet portion and the main outlet portion (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 5, the main inlet portion of the nozzle comprises a main inlet orifice (for example “68” or the top opening of 12 as shown in Fig. 2) providing access to the main chamber. Regarding claim 7, the main inlet portion of the nozzle comprises at least two main inlet orifices (two of “68”) providing access to the main chamber. Regarding claim 8, the nozzle body defines a retaining flange extending outward from the exterior surface at the main inlet portion, the nozzle further comprising a retaining mechanism configured to engage with the retaining flange, wherein the retaining mechanism is configured to couple the nozzle and the at least two main inlet orifices to a connector mechanism (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 12, the pipe body is elongated from the main inlet portion to the main outlet portion (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 16, the main inlet portion comprises a main inlet orifice (for example “68” or the top opening of 12 as shown in Fig. 2) providing access to the main chamber and the main outlet portion comprises a main outlet orifice (for example “78” or the bottom opening of 12 as shown in Fig. 2) extending from the main chamber to the exterior surface such that the main inlet orifice, the main chamber and the main outlet orifice are along a longitudinal axis of the pipe body. Regarding claim 17, the pipe body defines a bore along the longitudinal axis through the main inlet orifice, the main chamber and the main outlet orifice (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 18, the secondary inlet portion of the pipe body is disposed along the exterior surface between the main inlet portion and the main outlet portion and the secondary outlet portion of the pipe body is disposed along the exterior surface between the main inlet portion and the main outlet portion (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 19 the secondary inlet portion comprises a secondary inlet orifice (one of “34”), the secondary outlet portion comprises a secondary outlet orifice (another of “34”) and the secondary chamber comprises at least one path (a path within 32 for one instance of 34 to the other instance of 34) extending from the secondary inlet orifice to the secondary outlet orifice. Regarding claim 20, there exists a spiral path from the secondary inlet orifice to the secondary outlet orifice (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 21, a plurality of paths exists substantially circling the main chamber, the plurality of paths interconnected on an inlet end with an inlet routing path from the secondary inlet orifice and interconnected on an outlet end with an outlet routing path to the secondary outlet orifice (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 22, a plurality of paths exists substantially longitudinal to the main chamber, the plurality of paths interconnected on an inlet end with an inlet routing path from the secondary inlet orifice and interconnected on an outlet end with an outlet routing path to the secondary outlet orifice (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 23 a plurality of paths exists angled longitudinally in relation to the main chamber, the plurality of paths interconnected on an inlet end with an inlet routing path from the secondary inlet orifice and interconnected on an outlet end with an outlet routing path to the secondary outlet orifice (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 24, a longitudinal axis of the pipe body extends from the main inlet portion to the main outlet portion through the main chamber (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 25, the pipe body comprises an interior surface facing the main chamber, the pipe segment further comprising a mixing element (14) disposed within the main chamber such that a central area of the mixing element is along the longitudinal axis of the pipe body and a peripheral area of the mixing element extends from the central area toward the interior surface. Regarding claim 27, the mixing element is a rotary mixing element (14). Regarding claim 28, the main chamber has a circular cross section (see Fig. 3). Regarding claim 29, the main inlet portion comprises a main inlet orifice (for example “68” or the top opening of 12 as shown in Fig. 2) providing access to the main chamber. Regarding claim 30, the pipe body defines a retaining flange extending outward from the exterior surface at the main inlet portion, the pipe segment further comprising a retaining mechanism configured to engage with the retaining flange, wherein the retaining mechanism is configured to couple the pipe segment and the main inlet orifice to a connector mechanism (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 31 Lehner discloses a nozzle comprising a nozzle body comprising an exterior surface (exterior of 26) , at least two main inlet orifices (two of “68”), a main outlet orifice (for example “78” or the bottom opening of 12 as shown in Fig. 2), a secondary inlet orifice (on of “34” and a secondary outlet orifice (the other of “34”), the nozzle body defining a main chamber (interior of 12) extending from the at least two main inlet orifices to the main outlet orifice, the nozzle body further defining a secondary chamber (32) between the exterior surface and the main chamber and extending from the secondary inlet orifice to the secondary outlet orifice. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lehner (US 3,902,850) in view of Fleury (US 2015/0273731). The pipe segment of Lehner was discussed above. A nonstick coating is not disclosed. Fleury teaches providing an interior surface with a nonstick coating (see [0052]). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have provided a nonstick coating to avoid clogging as taught by Fleury at [0052]. Claim 35 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lehner (US 3,902,850) in view of Kelley (US 2004/0125688). Lehner discloses a system comprising a pipe segment comprising a pipe body having an exterior surface (exterior of 26), a main inlet portion (fluid entering though 22), a main outlet portion (fluid exiting through 16), a secondary inlet portion (a portion corresponding to one instance of “34”) and a secondary outlet portion (a portion corresponding to the other instance of “34”), the pipe body defining a main chamber (interior of 12) extending from the main inlet portion to the main outlet portion, the pipe body further defining a secondary chamber (32) between the exterior surface and the main chamber and extending from the secondary inlet portion to the secondary outlet portion, wherein the main inlet portion comprises a main inlet orifice (for example “68” or the top opening of 12 as shown in Fig. 2), wherein the main outlet portion comprises a main outlet orifice (for example “78” or the bottom opening of 12 as shown in Fig. 2), wherein the secondary inlet portion comprises a secondary inlet orifice (one of “34” or the orifice in 26 into which it is thread), wherein the secondary outlet portion comprises a secondary outlet orifice (the other “34” of the orifice in 26 into which it is threaded); a first fluid subsystem (a first of 64) in communication with the main chamber via a valve (67); a second fluid subsystem (a second of 64) in communication with the main chamber via a valve (67); and a third fluid system (the system providing coolant through 34) in fluid communication with the secondary chamber of the pipe body, wherein the third fluid subsystem is configured to selectively circulate a fluid through the secondary chamber via the secondary inlet orifice and the secondary outlet orifice. However, in Lehner, rather than one three-way valve, there are two valves (67). Kelley specifically teaches that a three-way valve is an alternative to such a pair of valves (see [0026]). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have substituted a single three-way valve for the pair of valves of Lehner because Kelley expressly explains that these valve arrangements are alternatives for providing a mixed flow (see [0026]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID L SORKIN whose telephone number is (571)272-1148. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Claire X Wang can be reached at (571) 270-1051. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DAVID L. SORKIN Examiner Art Unit 1774 /DAVID L SORKIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600060
DEVICE FOR PRODUCING AND CONDITIONING A MULTI-COMPONENT MIXTURE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A DEVICE OF THIS KIND
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599881
MIXER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599879
NANO CELL BLOCK MODULE FOR HOMOGENIZING A SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PRESSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594532
FOAM PITCHER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596312
TONER PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TONER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+12.5%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1170 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month