Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/305,801

MAINTENANCE ASSEMBLY FOR AN INKJET HEAD, MAINTENANCE METHOD FOR AN INKJET HEAD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A SUBSTRATE INCLUDING A MAINTENANCE ASSEMBLY FOR AN INKJET HEAD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Priority
May 12, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0058167
Examiner
VALENCIA, ALEJANDRO
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Semes Co., Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
43%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
49%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 43% of resolved cases
43%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 1391 resolved
-25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
150 currently pending
Career history
1528
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1391 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Interpretation This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “part” in all claims. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 6-8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Komatsu (2022/0250385) in view of Ueno (2022/0314612) and Nagashima (2007/0229611). Regarding claim 1, Komatsu teaches a maintenance assembly for an inkjet head, which comprises: a housing (fig. 4, item 51) having an upper face (fig. 4, face of portion generally denoted by 107 facing nozzles 105) facing a nozzle face (fig. 11, inside face of cap 51 facing nozzles 22) on which nozzles for discharging a chemical liquid on a substrate are arranged (note that ink contains chemicals); and a fluid supplying part (fig. 4, item 55a) for providing a humidity control fluid onto the nozzles and the nozzle face such that a humidity of the nozzles and a humidity of the nozzle face are adjusted to a set humidity if the humidity of the nozzles and the humidity of the nozzle face are different from the set humidity ([0065], [0088]-[0090], [0141]), wherein the humidity control fluid is selected from an oxygen gas, a nitrogen gas, a clean dried air and combinations thereof ([0101], note that clean air carries vapor), a fluid distributing part (fig. 4, item 52) between the fluid supplying part and the nozzle face (see fig. 4), configured to uniformly distribute the humidity control fluid over the nozzles and the nozzle face (see fig. 4), wherein the fluid distributing part has a mesh structure ([0058]), a chemical liquid collecting part (fig. 4, item 56b) configured to collect a remaining chemical liquid or a falling chemical liquid from the nozzles and the nozzle face in a vacuum suction manner (see figs. 4, 5, note that liquid or liquid entrained in air is suctioned through port 56b), the chemical liquid collecting part including a chemical liquid receiving part (fig. 4, opening of channel 56b in cap), the chemical liquid receiving part configured to receive the remaining chemical liquid or the falling chemical liquid ([0104]), the chemical liquid collecting part, the fluid supplying part, and the fluid distributing part being within the housing (see fig. 4). Komatsu does not teach wherein the chemical liquid receiving part is above the fluid distributing part relative to the fluid supplying part in a direction facing the nozzle face. Ueno teaches a two-way closed loop providing humidity control fluid into a housing to humidify nozzles on a nozzle face, wherein a fluid/liquid receiving part is above a fluid/liquid supplying part (Ueno, see fig. 4B, Note receiving part 61 and supplying part 63. Note that there is necessarily liquid vapor entrained in the gas that is collected by receiving part 61). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to arrange the housing of Komatsu in the manner disclosed by Ueno because doing so would amount to the simple substitution of one known housing arrangement for another to obtain predictable results. Upon combination, the resultant device would have a supply port on the bottom of the cap, a distributing mesh resting within the cap and a receiving port on the side of the cap and vertically above the mesh. Komatsu in view of Ueno does not teach wherein the fluid supply part includes a heater. Nagashima teaches this ([0150], fig. 11, item 113). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add a heater of the type disclosed by Nagashima to the fluid supply part of Komatsu in view of Ueno because doing so would allow for further control of the exact humidity in the fluid, thereby allowing for more precise control over the evaporative condition of the nozzles. Regarding claim 2, Komatsu in view of Ueno and Nagashima teaches the maintenance assembly for an inkjet head of claim 1, wherein the fluid supplying part includes an inflow line (Komatsu, fig. 5, item 66e) through which the humidity control fluid is provided from an external source (Komatsu, fig. 5, item 61), a humidity controlling part (Komatsu, fig. 16, item 91/60) for enabling the humidity control fluid to have the set humidity, and a supply line for providing the humidity control fluid having the set humidity onto the nozzles and the nozzle face (Komatsu, [0091]-[0092]). Regarding claim 4, Komatsu in view of Ueno and Nagashima teaches the maintenance assembly for an inkjet head of claim 2, further comprising a humidity sensing part for measuring the humidity of the nozzles and the humidity of the nozzle face, wherein the humidity controlling part adjusts the humidity of the humidity control fluid in accordance with results measured by the humidity sensing part (Nagashima, [0136]-[0138]). Regarding claim 6, Komatsu in view of Ueno and Nagashima teaches the maintenance assembly for an inkjet head of claim 1, further comprising a guide part (Komatsu, fig. 4, item 56C) for maintaining a constant distance between the upper face of the housing and the nozzle face (Komatsu, fig. 4). Regarding claim 7, Komatsu in view of Ueno and Nagashima teaches the maintenance assembly for an inkjet head of claim 1, further comprising a pressure controlling part for adjusting a pressure of the humidity control fluid, and a fluid discharging part for discharging the humidity control fluid to an outside (Komatsu, see fig. 4, Note that the pressure of the fluid is necessarily “controlled,” and note that “an outside” has not been defined. The fluid is supplied from fluid accommodating portion 61 to an outside of the fluid accommodating portion). Regarding claim 10, Komatsu in view of Nagashima teaches the maintenance assembly for an inkjet head of claim 9, wherein the chemical liquid collecting part includes a chemical liquid receiving part for receiving the remaining chemical liquid or the falling chemical liquid, a chemical liquid discharging part for temporally storing and discharging the remaining chemical liquid or the falling chemical liquid, and a connection line coupled to the chemical liquid receiving part and the chemical liquid discharging part (Komatsu, fig. 5, Note evacuation path 56b, 81a, 83-84). Claim(s) 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Komatsu in view of Ueno and Nagashima as applied to claim 1, and further in view of Vronsky (2019/0280204) Regarding claim 8, Komatsu in view of Ueno and Nagashima teaches the maintenance assembly for an inkjet head of claim 1. Komatsu in view of Ueno and Nagashima does not teach wherein the maintenance assembly further comprises an oxygen sensing part for measuring an amount of oxygen in the humidity control fluid over the nozzles and the nozzle face, and an amount of the humidity control fluid provided onto the nozzles and the nozzle face is adjusted in accordance with results measured by the oxygen sensing part. Vronsky teaches a printing apparatus with an oxygen sensor to monitor and adjust oxygen and humidity levels according to readings (Vronsky, [0060]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to apply the oxygen-concentration metering and supply system disclosed by Vronsky to the device disclosed by Komatsu in view of Nagashima would allow for precise control of the levels of oxygen present in the environment and more specifically proximate to the nozzle surface. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot in light of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO VALENCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MANISH SHAH can be reached at 571-272-2152. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEJANDRO VALENCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 10 earlier events
Jul 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752537
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE CONTROL METHOD AND LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12741466
WIPER UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734799
SUBSTRATE TREATING CONTROL METHOD, SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS, SUBSTRATE TREATING METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM STORED IN COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR TREATING SUBSTRATE
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734815
CARTRIDGE AND PRINTING APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734830
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
43%
Grant Probability
49%
With Interview (+6.2%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1391 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month