Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/306,054

ARBITRARILY TAILORABLE ELECTROCHROMIC DEVICE AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Examiner
THOMAS, BRANDI N
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
897 granted / 1089 resolved
+14.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1113
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
58.5%
+18.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1089 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgement is made of receipt of Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO-1449) filed 4/24/2023. An initialed copy is attached to this Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Granquist, Claes Goeran (WO 2012/138281), hereinafter Goeran. Regarding claim 1, Goeran discloses an arbitrarily tailorable electrochromic device (1, electrochromic device) (paragraph 15), comprising in order of a first transparent flexible substrate (22, first substrate) (paragraph 15 and paragraph 18 discloses the substrate is transparent), a first transparent electron-conductive layer (12, first electron conducting layer) an electrochromic layer (16, electrochromic layers) (paragraph 15), an electrolyte solution (20, electrolyte solution) with automatically curable in presence of air and/or moisture to achieve a self-encapsulation function (paragraph 22 discloses a gel polymer electrolytes which are cured by moisture), an ion storage layer (18, counter electrode layer) (paragraph 15 discloses the counter electrode layer 18 is capable of conducting electron and ions, and serves as an ion storage layer), a second transparent electron-conductive layer (14, second electron conducting layer) and a second transparent flexible substrate (24, second substrate) (paragraph 15 and paragraph 18 discloses the substrate is transparent). Regarding claim 18, Goeran discloses use of the arbitrarily tailorable electrochromic device according to claim 1 in a display screen of an electronic terminal device, a smart window in an environmental- friendly architectural, an automotive color-changing glass or an automatic anti-glare rear-view mirror (paragraph 1 discloses use ranging from eyewear to displays and in use in a window). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 11-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Granquist, Claes Goeran (WO 2012/138281), hereinafter Goeran as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Yashiro et al. (2017/0010514), hereinafter Yashiro. Regarding claim 11, Goeran discloses all the limitations in common with claim 1, and such is hereby incorporated. Goeran fails to disclose wherein the electrolyte solution has a thickness of 10 nm-300 µm. Okada discloses wherein the electrolyte solution has a thickness of 10 nm-300 µm (Examiner notes that 300 µm is equal to 300,000 nm) (paragraph 0275 discloses a thickness of 0.2 µm to 5 µm; which is 200-5000 nm; this is within the claimed range). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the device of Goeran with the thickness of the electrolyte solution of Yashiro for the purpose of moving the ions to conduct electricity within the electrochromic display. Regarding claim 12, Goeran discloses all the limitations in common with claim 1, and such is hereby incorporated. Goeran fails to disclose wherein the electrolyte solution has a thickness of 50 nm-150 µm. Okada discloses wherein the electrolyte solution has a thickness of 10 nm-300 µm (Examiner notes that 150 µm is equal to 150,000 nm) (paragraph 0275 discloses a thickness of 0.2 µm to 5 µm; which is 200-5000 nm; this is within the claimed range). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the device of Goeran with the thickness of the electrolyte solution of Yashiro for the purpose of moving the ions to conduct electricity within the electrochromic display. Claim(s) 13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Granquist, Claes Goeran (WO 2012/138281), hereinafter Goeran as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of He Jiazhi et al. (WO 2020056326), hereinafter He. Regarding claim 13, Goeran discloses wherein materials of the first transparent flexible substrate and the second transparent flexible substrate are each independently at least one of polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyvinyl chloride, nylon, polyethylene imine, polyimide, polypropylene, polycarbonate, cyclic olefin polymer, cellulose acetate, polyurethane and polydimethylsiloxane (paragraph 18 discloses polyimide, polycarbonate, polyurethane, and polyethylene); and/or materials of the first transparent electron-conductive layer and the second transparent electron-conductive layer are each independently at least one of a metal oxide, a doped metal oxide, a conductive transparent nitride, a metal, and an alloy (paragraph 19 discloses several metal oxides including Indium Tin oxide (ITO), Tin oxide, Zinc oxide, n- or p-doped Zinc oxide and Zinc oxyfluoride); and/or the electrochromic layer is at least one of an inorganic electrochromic layer and an organic electrochromic layer, a material of the inorganic electrochromic layer being at least one of tungsten oxide, niobium oxide, titanium oxide, molybdenum oxide, copper oxide, chromium oxide, manganese oxide, vanadium oxide, cobalt oxide, nickel oxide, prussian blue, a transition metal sulfide and a phthalocyanine compound, a material of the organic electrochromic layer being at least one of viologen (a quarternary ammonium salt of 1,l'-disubstituted-4,4'-bipyridyl compound), polyaniline, polypyrrole, polythiophene and derivatives thereof (paragraph 17 discloses cathodically colouring thin films of oxides based on tungsten, molybdenum, niobium, titanium, lead and/ or bismuth, or anodically colouring thin films of oxides, hydroxides and/ or oxy- hydrides based on nickel, iridium, iron, chromium, cobalt and/ or rhodium); and/or the ion storage layer uses a complementary material of coloring of the electrochromic layer (paragraph 0022 discloses coloured or non-coloured). Goeran does not specifically disclose the first transparent flexible substrate and the second transparent flexible substrate each independently have a thickness of 0.05 nm-1.00 mm; the first transparent electron-conductive layer and the second transparent electron-conductive layer each independently have a thickness of 10 nm-1000 nm; the electrochromic layer having a thickness of 10 nm-2000 nm; and the ion storage layer having a thickness of 1 nm-2000 nm. He discloses the first transparent flexible substrate and the second transparent flexible substrate each independently have a thickness of 0.05 nm-1.00 mm (Examiner notes that 500 µm is equal to .5 mm) (paragraph 0050 discloses the flexible substrates may be 10 to 1000 µm; which is within the claimed range); the first transparent electron-conductive layer and the second transparent electron-conductive layer each independently have a thickness of 10 nm-1000 nm (paragraph 0051 discloses 1 to 800 nm which is within the claimed range); the electrochromic layer having a thickness of 10 nm-2000 nm (Examiner notes that 1 µm is equal to 1000 nm) (paragraph 0056 discloses the electrochromic layer is 1 nm to 10 µm which is within the claimed range); and the ion storage layer having a thickness of 1 nm-2000 nm (paragraph 0055 discloses 1 nm to 10 µm, which is within the claimed range). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the device of Goeran with the thickness of He for the purpose of optimal use of the electrochromic device. Regarding claim 14, Goeran discloses wherein materials of the first transparent flexible substrate and the second transparent flexible substrate are each independently at least one of polyethylene terephthalate, polycarbonate, polyvinyl chloride (paragraph 18 discloses polycarbonate); and/or materials of the first transparent electron-conductive layer and the second transparent electron-conductive layer are each independently at least one of Indium Tin oxide layer, a fluorine-doped tin oxide layer and a nano-silver wire layer (paragraph 19 discloses several metal oxides including Indium Tin oxide (ITO), Tin oxide, Zinc oxide, n- or p-doped Zinc oxide and Zinc oxyfluoride); and/or a material of the electrochromic layer is at least one of tungsten oxide, titanium oxide, manganese oxide and vanadium oxide, prussian blue, viologen (a quarternary ammonium salt of 1,l'-disubstituted-4,4'-bipyridyl compound), polyaniline, polypyrrole, polythiophene and derivatives thereof (paragraph 17 discloses cathodically colouring thin films of oxides based on tungsten, molybdenum, niobium, titanium, lead and/ or bismuth, or anodically colouring thin films of oxides, hydroxides and/ or oxy- hydrides based on nickel, iridium, iron, chromium, cobalt and/ or rhodium); and/or the ion storage layer is tungsten oxide, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, Prussian blue, viologen (a quarternary ammonium salt of 1,l'-disubstituted-4,4'-bipyridyl compound), polyaniline (paragraph 0022 discloses TiO2 or other oxides). Goeran does not specifically disclose the first transparent flexible substrate and the second transparent flexible substrate each independently have a thickness of 0.100 nm-0.50 mm; the first transparent electron-conductive layer and the second transparent electron-conductive layer each independently have a thickness of 20 nm-200 nm; the electrochromic layer having a thickness of 30 nm-1000 nm; and the ion storage layer having a thickness of 30 nm-1000 nm. He discloses the first transparent flexible substrate and the second transparent flexible substrate each independently have a thickness of 0.100 nm-0.50 mm (Examiner notes that 500 µm is equal to .5 mm) (paragraph 0050 discloses the flexible substrates may be 10 to 1000 µm; which is within the claimed range); the first transparent electron-conductive layer and the second transparent electron-conductive layer each independently have a thickness of 20 nm-200 nm (paragraph 0051 discloses 1 to 800 nm which is within the claimed range); the electrochromic layer having a thickness of 30 nm-1000 nm (Examiner notes that 1 µm is equal to 1000 nm) (paragraph 0056 discloses the electrochromic layer is 1 nm to 10 µm which is within the claimed range); and the ion storage layer having a thickness of 30 nm-1000 nm (paragraph 0055 discloses 1 nm to 10 µm, which is within the claimed range). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 and 15-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art taken either singularly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the limitations of the independent claim(s), in such a manner that a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 would be proper. The prior art fails to teach a combination of all the claimed features as presented in claim(s) 2, wherein the claimed invention comprises, in claim 2, wherein the electrolyte solution comprises a component which is curable in presence of air and/or moisture, a solvent and an electrolyte; a content of the component which is curable in presence of air and/or moisture in the electrolyte solution is 20%-70% by mass, and a total content of the electrolyte and the solvent in the electrolyte solution is 30%-80% by mass; and a concentration of the electrolyte in a mixture of both the electrolyte and the solvent is 0.1 mol/L -10.0 mol/L, as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDI N THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)272-2341. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 - 3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephone Allen can be reached at 571-272-2434. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDI N THOMAS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601897
OPTICAL LENS ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601919
COMPACT DISPLAY SYSTEM HAVING UNIFORM IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585168
ZOOMING ACTUATOR HAVING DUAL STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575730
OPHTHALMIC SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLINICAL DEVICE USING TRANSCLERAL ILLUMINATION WITH MULTIPLE POINTS SOURCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564319
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR QUANTITATIVE OCULAR SURFACE DIAGNOSTICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1089 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month