Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/306,485

METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING DISCHARGE OF BATTERY

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 25, 2023
Priority
Nov 11, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0155054 +1 more
Examiner
ZHOU, ZIXUAN
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
473 granted / 616 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
642
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 06/02/2026 has been entered. Claims 4, 16 have been cancelled. No claims have been newly added. Therefore, claims 1-3, 5-15, 17-20 remain pending in this application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/13/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 9-15, 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Makino et al. US 2022/0089051 (hereinafter Makino). Regarding claim 1, Makino discloses an electronic device comprising: a first battery (fig. 1, element A); a second battery (fig. 1, element B) connected in parallel (¶ 0022; battery stack A and battery stack B share the same nodes when SWa and SWb are controlled to the on-state) with the first battery; a first current control module (¶¶ 0022-0023; fig. 1, elements SWa and 43a), comprising circuitry, configured to control a first discharge current of the first battery (by turning on and off the switch SWa); a second current control module (¶¶ 0022-0023; fig. 1, elements SWb and 43b), comprising circuitry, configured to control a second discharge current of the second battery (by turning on and off the switch SWb); a sensor module (¶ 0023; The battery sensors 51a to 51c serve to detect information about each of the battery stacks A to C, such as temperature, charge/discharge current, and terminal voltage), comprising at least one sensor, configured to sense a first temperature of the first battery and a second temperature of the second battery (¶ 0040; temperatures Ta, Tb, and Tc of the battery stacks A to C are read); a memory (¶ 0093); and a processor (¶ 0093) comprising processing circuitry operatively connected to the first current control module, the second current control module, the sensor module, and the memory (¶ 0093; at least one processor can be configured, by reading instructions from at least one machine readable tangible medium, to perform all or a part of functions of the controllers including the battery controller 60, the motor controller 61, the converter controller 62, the device controller 63, and the main controller 64), wherein the processor is configured to: measure the first temperature of the first battery and the second temperature of the second battery via at least the sensor module (¶ 0023; The battery sensors 51a to 51c serve to detect information about each of the battery stacks A to C, such as temperature, charge/discharge current, and terminal voltage) calculate a difference value between the first temperature and the second temperature (¶ 0046; it is determined whether the temperature difference (Ta-Tb) between the battery stacks A and B is less than or equal to the allowed temperature difference ΔT), identify whether at least one reference condition is satisfied, based on the difference value exceeding a configured reference value (¶ 0046; if it is determined at step S26 that the temperature difference (Ta-Tb) is above the allowed temperature difference ΔT), and when the at least one reference condition is satisfied (¶ 0046) and the first temperature of the first battery is higher than the second temperature of the second battery (¶ 0046; if it is determined at step S26 that the temperature difference (Ta-Tb) is above the allowed temperature difference ΔT in other words, if it is determined at step S26 that the temperature Ta of the battery stack A has risen relative to the battery stack B to such an extent that their temperature difference exceeds a predetermined temperature difference; means TA-TB > ΔT_ threshold or battery stack A is hotter than battery stack B), reduce the first discharge current of the first battery via the first current control module (¶ 0046; In the series mode B, the switch SWb of the switch selector 50 is controlled to an on-state, and the switches SWa and SWc are controlled to an off-state; means that the battery stack A is not discharging (reducing to zero) when the switch is controlled to the off-state), and increase the second discharge current of the second battery via the second current control module based on a reduction amount of the first discharge current (¶¶ 0035, 0046; the charge/discharge power a2 of the battery stack A in the series mode can be made greater than the charge/discharge power a3 of the battery stack A in the parallel mode. Thus, when the switch [SWb] is controlled to the on-state, the charge/discharge power of the battery stack b in the series mode can be made greater than the charge/discharge power a3 of the battery stack B in the parallel mode because no current is flowing into battery stack A and the battery stack C). Regarding claims 2 and 14, Makino discloses wherein the processor is configured to: identify whether at least one of the first temperature of the first battery and the second temperature of the second battery exceeds a configured absolute reference value (¶ 0046; a predetermined temperature difference); and identify that the at least one reference condition is satisfied, based on at least one of the first temperature of the first battery and the second temperature of the second battery exceeding the absolute reference value (¶ 0046; it is determined at step S26 that the temperature Ta of the battery stack A has risen relative to the battery stack B to such an extent that their temperature difference exceeds a predetermined temperature difference). Regarding claims 3 and 15, Makino discloses wherein the processor is configured to: based on the at least one reference condition being identified as having been satisfied, identify a battery of which a temperature has risen relatively higher among the first battery and the second battery (¶ 0046; if it is determined at step S26 that the temperature Ta of the battery stack A has risen relative to the battery stack B to such an extent that their temperature difference exceeds a predetermined temperature difference); and configure a discharge current of the identified battery to be low, via a current control module, comprising circuitry, corresponding to the identified battery (¶ 0046; In the series mode B, the switch SWb of the switch selector 50 is controlled to an on-state, and the switches SWa and SWc are controlled to an off-state). Regarding claim 5, Makino discloses wherein the processor is configured to configure the second discharge current of the second battery to a current value allowable for the second battery (¶¶ 0040, 0041, 0048, 0049, 0053; dischargeable electric energy). Regarding claims 9 and 19, Makino discloses wherein the processor is configured to: identify a total amount of current supplied to a system of the electronic device, based on the first discharge current and the second discharge current (fig. 4, element a3 + a3 + a3); and at least partially limit a function of the system, based on the identified total amount of current (see fig. 7, step 27 or 29 or 32). Regarding claim 10, Makino discloses wherein the sensor module comprises a first temperature sensor configured to sense a first temperature of the first battery and a second temperature sensor configured to sense a second temperature of the second battery (¶ 0023; The battery sensors 51a to 51c serve to detect information about each of the battery stacks A to C, such as temperature, charge/discharge current, and terminal voltage), and wherein the processor is configured to: measure the first temperature of the first battery via the first temperature sensor; and individually measure the second temperature of the second battery via the second temperature sensor (¶ 0023; The battery sensors 51a to 51c serve to detect information about each of the battery stacks A to C, such as temperature, charge/discharge current, and terminal voltage). Regarding claim 11, Makino discloses wherein the first current control module comprises a first battery capacity measurement module, comprising circuitry configured to measure a residual capacity of the first battery, and wherein the second current control module comprises a second battery capacity measurement module, comprising circuitry, configured to measure a residual capacity of the second battery (¶¶ 0027-0028; The output determiner 70 determines the state of output of each of the battery stacks A to C. The output determiner 70 of the main controller 64 determines, based on information such as the temperature and SOC of each of the battery stacks A to C, whether each of the battery stacks A to C is in low output state or in normal output state). Regarding claims 12 and 20, Makino discloses wherein the processor is configured to: measure the residual capacity of the first battery via the first battery capacity measurement module (¶¶ 0023, 0027-0028); determine the first discharge current of the first battery via the first current control module, based on the measured residual capacity of the first battery (¶ 0088; the dischargeable electric energies Wa to We each calculated based on temperature and SOC may be used in determining whether each of the battery stacks A to C is in low output state); measure the residual capacity of the second battery via the second battery capacity measurement module (¶¶ 0023, 0027-0028); and determine the second discharge current of the second battery via the second current control module, based on the measured residual capacity of the second battery (¶ 0088). Regarding claim 13, Makino discloses a method comprising: measuring (¶ 0040; temperatures Ta, Tb, and Tc of the battery stacks A to C are read) a first temperature of a first battery (fig. 1, battery stack A) and a second temperature of a second battery (fig. 1, battery stack B); calculating a difference value between the first temperature and the second temperature (¶ 0046; it is determined whether the temperature difference (Ta-Tb) between the battery stacks A and B is less than or equal to the allowed temperature difference ΔT); identifying whether at least one reference condition is satisfied, based on the difference value exceeding a configured reference value (¶ 0046; if it is determined at step S26 that the temperature difference (Ta-Tb) is above the allowed temperature difference ΔT); when the at least one reference condition is satisfied (¶ 0046) and the first temperature of the first battery is higher than the second temperature of the second battery (¶ 0046; if it is determined at step S26 that the temperature difference (Ta-Tb) is above the allowed temperature difference ΔT in other words, if it is determined at step S26 that the temperature Ta of the battery stack A has risen relative to the battery stack B to such an extent that their temperature difference exceeds a predetermined temperature difference; means TA-TB > ΔT_ threshold or battery stack A is hotter than battery stack B), reducing a first discharge current of the first battery (¶ 0046; In the series mode B, the switch SWb of the switch selector 50 is controlled to an on-state, and the switches SWa and SWc are controlled to an off-state; means that the battery stack A is not discharging (reducing to zero) when the switch is controlled to the off-state); and increasing a second discharge current of the second battery based on a reduction amount of the first discharge current (¶¶ 0035, 0046; the charge/discharge power a2 of the battery stack A in the series mode can be made greater than the charge/discharge power a3 of the battery stack A in the parallel mode. Thus, when the switch [SWb] is controlled to the on-state, the charge/discharge power of the battery stack b in the series mode can be made greater than the charge/discharge power a3 of the battery stack B in the parallel mode because no current is flowing into battery stack A and the battery stack C). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-8, 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claims 6 and 17, Makino discloses wherein the reference value comprises a first reference value and a second reference value, wherein the absolute reference value comprises a first absolute reference value and a second absolute reference value, and wherein the second reference value is relatively greater than the first reference value, and the second absolute reference value is relatively greater than the first absolute reference value. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 13 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZIXUAN ZHOU whose telephone number is (571)272-6739. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman can be reached at (571) 272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZIXUAN ZHOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 06/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706468
BATTERY CONNECTION STATUS DETECTION CIRCUIT AND METHOD, BATTERY, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691787
POWER CELL TRACKING AND OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695313
CHARGING CIRCUITRY, CHARGING METHOD AND POWER SYSTEM FOR SUPERCAPACITOR
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691781
BIDIRECTIONAL VEHICLE TO LOAD CHARGING COMMUNICATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695409
ENERGY STORAGE ROBOT AND ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month