Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/307,268

MOVABLE BODY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 26, 2023
Examiner
HAGHANI, SHADAN E
Art Unit
2485
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
221 granted / 366 resolved
+2.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
399
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.3%
+20.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 366 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/30/2025 has been entered. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species in Figs. 3-4, claims 37-38, 42-44, 49, and 65-70, in the reply filed on 10/14/2024 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the election requirement was unclear. Applicant responded to the election requirement correctly and there are no further issues regarding the election. The election of species shall be withdrawn when a linking claim is found allowable. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 37-38, 42, 44, and 65-69 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) in view of Chawla (US 20120175521 A1) and Federici (US 6815683 B2) and Boucourt (US PG Publication 2017/0195634 A1). Regarding Claim 37, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses A movable body (airplane 900, Fig. 4, [0089]) comprising an imaging system (cameras 380 [0089]), an inspection object (people [0032]) using an aisle (any aisle in Fig. 4) of a common-use portion (any common use portion in Fig. 4, “G” or “L” region, spaces that appear to be emergency exits, partitions between cabins) of the movable body, and a plurality of cameras configured to capture an image of the inspection object (cameras 380, [0089], Fig. 4); wherein the aisle is defined by walls (walls around the lavatory, “L”, and galley “G”, Fig. 4) and includes a first aisle extending in a first direction (aisle up and down airplane, Fig. 4), and a second aisle extending in a second direction (aisle across airplane, Fig. 4) and intersecting with the first aisle (the aisle across the airplane, e.g., at the center L, intersects with the aisles up and down the airplane, Fig. 4) at a connection portion (by definition, the area where the aisles connect is a “connection portion”) such that the walls include at least two corner portions (each of the G walls and the L walls have corners, Fig. 4) facing the connection portion (The G wall has a corner facing a connection portion and the L wall has a corner facing the connection portion, at the lavatory in the coach section of the airplane, Fig. 4). Sasson does not disclose, but Chawla (US 20120175521 A1) teaches an imaging system ( plurality of elements comprising emitters 101 and detectors 276 may be arranged in a rectangular grid), the imaging system including a plurality of illumination sources ( plurality of elements comprising emitters 101 and detectors 276 may be arranged in a rectangular grid [0031]) configured to irradiate, with a terahertz wave (Terahertz emitter [0030]), an inspection object (human [0031]), and a plurality of cameras (detectors 276 may be arranged in a rectangular grid [0031]) having optical axes facing directions different from each other (Hundreds of apertures may be needed to cover the entire wall, floor and ceiling surface of the portal [0025], Fig. 2; with the apertures—each having a Thz emitter and camera—covering the floor and ceiling and pointed at the human subject, the axes of each apertures and each camera is different from the other apertures and cameras; see, e.g., the portal arrangement in Fig. 4) and configured to capture an image formed of the reflected terahertz wave (The image reflected from the lens will be sent to an image capturing device 216 [0025], Fig. 2) from the inspection object irradiated with the terahertz wave by the plurality of illumination sources (obtaining the explosive spectrum from both sides of the human body [0031]); illumination sources at each of the at least two [] portions (the emitter/detector 101/276 units may be arranged in a rectangular grid contained in both the opposite walls 502/504 of the portal booth 500 [0036]). Sasson does not disclose, but Federici (US 6815683 B2) teaches wherein the number of the plurality of illumination sources is larger than the number of the plurality of cameras (Fig. 1, there are a number of sources to one imaging array); wherein the plurality of illumination sources (ThZ sources 10, Fig. 1) are concentrated in each of the at least [] corner portions (at the front left corner of the portal, Fig. 1), and are superimposed vertically (ThZ sources 10 are vertically arranged, Fig. 1) at each of the at least [] corner portions (at the front left corner of the gate, Fig. 1). Sasson does not disclose, but Boucourt (US PG Publication 2017/0195634 A1) teaches wherein the plurality of cameras includes a first camera arranged over the first aisle and a second camera arranged over the second aisle (first, second, and third cameras around the zone of interest monitoring traffic around the cockpit, lateral access door, and transverse aisle, [0005]-[0012]). One of ordinary skill in the art before the application was filed would have been motivated to install the terahertz threat detection system of Chawla to supplement the threat detection system of Sasson on-board the aircraft because Chawla teaches that the terahertz frequency can detect explosive and other dangerous substances, which Sasson cannot detect [0008], improving the safety of everyone onboard the airplane. One of ordinary skill in the art before the application was filed would have been motivated to reduce the number of detectors in Chawla by using the detector of Federici because Federici teaches that it can generate a wide field of view image with high resolution and image multiple sourcs of radiation simultaneously (Column 3 lines 30-50), improving region of interest detection and resulting in a more effective threat detection system. One of ordinary skill in the art before the application was filed would have been motivated to install cameras around the zone of interest of Sasson as described by Boucourt because Boucourt teaches that it was conventional practice to install cameras around the entrance to the airplane and the cockpit to prevent terrorists from taking over the airplane [0003]. Regarding Claim 38, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 37, wherein the aisle includes a deck (note, “deck” is defined in the specification as n aisle partitioned by a door, Spec. at [0047]; “main deck” Fig. 5, other aisles that are partitioned, e.g., at row 29/27, 15/6, Fig. 4), and the plurality of cameras include a camera configured to capture the inspection object using the deck (cameras 380 in Fig. 5; cameras around rows 29/27/25/6, Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 42, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 37, the plurality of cameras include a camera configured to capture the inspection object passing through the connecting portion between the first aisle and the second aisle (cameras 380 at aisles at rows 29/27/15/6/1, Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 43, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 42, wherein the imaging system further comprises a visible light camera that captures an image of the inspection object to track the inspection object (detecting suspicious patterns [0086]). Regarding Claim 49, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 37. Sasson does not disclose, but Chawla (US 20120175521 A1) teaches the plurality of illumination sources irradiate the inspection object passing through the connecting portion with the terahertz wave, and the plurality of cameras capture the inspection object irradiated with the terahertz wave (the vertical columns of the grid may be parallel to the height of the subject; located on the opposite walls of a booth or chamber for obtaining the explosive spectrum from both sides of the human body [0031]). One of ordinary skill in the art before the application was filed would have been motivated to install the terahertz threat detection system of Chawla to supplement the threat detection system of Sasson on-board the aircraft because Chawla teaches that the terahertz frequency can detect explosive and other dangerous substances, which Sasson cannot detect [0008], improving the safety of everyone onboard the airplane. Regarding Claim 65, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 37, wherein the imaging system is arranged at a position where the inspection object moving in the movable body is rectified (“rectified” means where passengers are lined-up or enqueued, Spec at [0053]; cameras 380 covering the aisles of the airplane 900 capture images where the passengers are “rectified--” it is well-known that airplane aisle are so narrow that passengers are lined-up, Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 66, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 37, wherein the imaging system is arranged at a position where the inspection object moving in the movable body makes a direction change (there is a camera 380 at the entrance of the plane, where passengers must make an L-shaped turn to get to their seats, Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 67, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 37, wherein the imaging system is arranged at a position where the inspection object moving in the movable body decelerates or stops (there is a camera 380 at the entrance of the plane, where passengers must make an L-shaped turn to get to their seats, Fig. 4; there is also an inspection system near the bathroom [0036]). Regarding Claim 68, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 37, wherein the imaging system is arranged at a position where the inspection object moving in the movable body rotates (there is a camera 380 at the entrance of the plane, where passengers must make an L-shaped turn to get to their seats, Fig. 4; there is also an inspection system near the bathroom [0036]). Regarding Claim 69, Sasson (US 20100253781 A1) discloses the movable body according to claim 37. Sasson does not disclose, but Federici (US 6815683 B2) teaches wherein no illumination sources are arranged on the wall other than the at least [] corner portions (ThZ sources at the front left corner of the portal, Fig. 1). Although Federici does not explicitly teach sources at two corner portions, installing sources at two corner portions is obvious because duplicating Federici’s arrangement for the purpose of capturing either a second target or the target from a second direction is obvious because it is a replication of an existing system. One of ordinary skill in the art before the application was filed would have been motivated to reduce the number of detectors in Chawla by using the detector of Federici because Federici teaches that it can generate a wide field of view image with high resolution and image multiple sourcs of radiation simultaneously (Column 3 lines 30-50), improving region of interest detection and resulting in a more effective threat detection system. Response to Arguments Applicant’s remarks filed 7/30/2025 have been considered but are unpersuasive. Applicant argues that the combination of references does not teach the amended limitations of the aisles, walls, lights at the corners, and cameras on the aisle. However, each of the references teaches some of these features. Sasson teaches the aisles, the walls, and the corners. Most people who have traveled by airplane would know that airplanes have aisles, walls, and corners. Federici depicts emitters vertically arranged at a corner of the gate/portal; and Chawla describes emitters/detectors on opposing sides. Although no reference explicitly discloses cameras over the aisles, this feature is both obvious and also shown by a new reference incorporated into this office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20200249156 A1 US 20070235658 A1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHADAN E HAGHANI whose telephone number is (571)270-5631. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM - 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jay Patel can be reached on 571-272-2988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHADAN E HAGHANI/Examiner, Art Unit 2485
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 27, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jul 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604020
VIDEO DECODING METHOD AND DECODER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598323
INTER PREDICTION-BASED VIDEO ENCODING AND DECODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586336
WEARABLE DEVICE, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM CONTROLLING LIGHT RADIATION OF LIGHT SOURCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574549
CHROMA INTRA PREDICTION WITH FILTERING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568225
LIMITING A NUMBER OF CONTEXT CODED BINS FOR RESIDUE CODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 366 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month