Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/308,611

REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION-FREE QUANTITATIVE-DISCRETE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR POST-PROCESS QUALITY CONTROL OF VESICULAR BIOLOGICS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 27, 2023
Examiner
WOOLWINE, SAMUEL C
Art Unit
1681
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Wayne State University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
515 granted / 843 resolved
+1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
897
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 843 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The language “wherein the digital signal is within a single-vesicular manufacture threshold” is not understood, rendering the scope of the claim indefinite. It is also unclear how this would relate to the language in claim 1 that the “digital signal” comprises “a percentage of fluorescing reactor microenvironments”. Appropriate clarification is required. Claims 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The language of claim 10 is unclear. In particular it is unclear what is meant by “a respective count”. Appropriate clarification is required. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “several thousand” is vague and indefinite, as there could be disagreement as to how many thousand is needed to constitute “several thousand”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 and 13-18 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the claimed invention requires capturing manufactured vesicles comprising target nucleic acids (e.g., liposomes or lipid nanoparticles loaded with, e.g. mRNA or miRNA). The vesicles are captured onto an “intermediate capture medium” (e.g. a magnetic bead) which is then sealed within “a plurality of sealable reactor environments”. This latter aspect means that the intermediate capture medium must be a plurality of discrete entities, rather than a single monolithic structure, so as to allow for the production of a plurality of reactor environments each having intermediate capture medium. PCR is then conducted within these reactor environments, and two different types of measurements are taken. First, a percentage of fluorescing reactor environments is determined (a digital readout of each reactor environment being positive or negative for target). Second, for each reactor environment, a fluorescence intensity is measured after each cycle for a plurality of PCR cycles. These two different types of measurement allow for the determination of the number of vesicles containing target, and for each such vesicle, the number of target nucleic acid molecules contained within the vesicle, respectively. This procedure is not taught or fairly suggested in the prior art. CN110106233A discloses a method for PCR detection of exosomes containing nucleic acid. Such exosomes are not manufactured as such, but naturally occurring in the circulation. The method includes capturing exosomes to microspheres. The reference also discloses (paragraph [0021] of the translation included herewith): “The digital PCR detection method for extracellular vesicles/exosomes is characterized in that the quantification method in step 2) includes a relative quantification method based on fluorescence signal intensity and an absolute quantification method based on the counting of fluorescence signal points.” However, this reference does not disclose carrying out the “relative quantification method based on fluorescence signal intensity” on the same reaction volumes as used for the digital PCR (i.e., the “absolute quantification method based on the counting of fluorescence signal points”. The two types of amplification were conducted separately. Henley discloses a system and method for performing digital PCR to quantify target nucleic acids. Target nucleic acids from a sample are captured onto beads, and the beads are distributed to individual wells of an array such that each well contains a single bead. As disclosed in the abstract: “At low target concentrations, most beads capture, on average, less than one target molecule, and precise, digital PCR quantification can be derived from the percentage of positive reactions. At higher concentrations, qPCR signal is used to determine the average number of target molecules per reaction, significantly extending the dynamic range beyond the digital saturation point.” That is, Henley’s method performs the same two types of measurement as the claims (counting the number of positive wells, while also determining a fluorescence signal for each well of a plurality of positive wells after each of a plurality of cycles; see Fig. 41). However, Henley did not disclose or fairly suggest using the method to capture vesicles. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL C WOOLWINE whose telephone number is (571)272-1144. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, GARY BENZION can be reached at 571-272-0782. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL C WOOLWINE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1681 1 Henley averaged the signals from the positive wells, rather than track the signal from each well discretely.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 27, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595462
HIGH THROUGHPUT GENETIC BARCODING AND ANALYSIS METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584167
METHOD FOR AMPLIFYING NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE AND SEQUENCE DETERMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12545951
SIMPLIFIED POLYNUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE DETECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12534569
FLOW CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12529097
DIGITAL ANALYTE ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+19.8%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 843 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month