Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/308,722

THERMAL MANAGEMENT FOR ROTOR OF ELECTRIC MOTOR

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 28, 2023
Examiner
STEFANON, JUSTIN
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fca Us LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allow Rate
94 granted / 183 resolved
-16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +68% interview lift
Without
With
+68.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
233
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§102
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§112
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 183 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 6, lines 7-11, filed 06/11/2025, with respect to “Amendment to the Specification” have been fully considered and are persuasive. The Objection of the Specification has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see page 6, lines 12-19, filed 06/11/2025, with respect to “Rejection Under 35 U.S.C. § 112” have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejections of claims 1-12 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) have been withdrawn. While not addressed in Applicant’s arguments, the amended claim 1 resolves the Claim Objections of the previous office action by changing ‘though’ to ‘through.’ The objection of claim 1 has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-12, pages 6-9, regarding “Rejection Under 35 U.S.C. § 102” have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by HORII (US 10116178). Regarding claim 1, HORII discloses an electric motor (100) having a thermal management system and for use in an electrified vehicle (this statement in the preamble recites the purpose or intended use of the claimed invention; it does not result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art. See MPEP 2111.02), the electric motor (100) including a rotor (11) and a stator (1), the thermal management system comprising: a hollow shaft (12) having an internal channel (33) extending through a longitudinal length of the shaft such that the internal channel (33) includes an axial length greater than an axial length of the rotor (11) such that the internal channel (33) extends axially outward and beyond opposed axial ends of the rotor (11) and the stator (1) (see Fig. 1); and one or more shaft radial channels (34) in communication with the internal channel (33) and extending radially outward therefrom through the shaft (12) (see Fig. 1); and PNG media_image1.png 460 499 media_image1.png Greyscale the rotor (11) coupled to the hollow shaft (12) for rotation therewith (see col. 3, lines 61-63), the rotor (11) including axial channels (17) extending axially through a core (13) of the rotor (11) and one or more rotor radial channels (27) corresponding to and aligning with the one or more shaft radial channels (34) (see Fig. 1), the rotor radial channels (27) being in communication with the axial channels (17) and the internal channel (33) of the hollow shaft (12) via the shaft radial channels (34) (see Fig. 1); wherein the electric motor (100) is adapted to receive cooling oil into the hollow shaft (12) and route the same to the rotor axial channels (17) via the one or more shaft and rotor radial channels (30) and to the opposed axial ends of the rotor to cool the core (13) of the rotor (11) (see Fig. 1 and col. 6, lines 1-8). Regarding claim 2, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 1, wherein the hollow shaft (12) is defined by the rotor (11). (See col. 3, lines 61-63 the shaft is “press-fitted into and fixed to a shaft insertion aperture.” As such, the location and movement of the shaft are tied to the rotor and the shaft is ‘defined by the rotor’, as broadly claimed), Regarding claim 3, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 1, wherein the opposed axial ends of the rotor (11) comprise first and second opposed axial ends (25,29) and radial inner and outer exterior surfaces, and wherein the one or more rotor radial channels (30) are positioned between the first and second axial ends (25,29) of the rotor (11) (see Fig. 1). Regarding claim 4, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 3, wherein the axial channels (17) are positioned through the core (13) of the rotor (11) and extending between and through the first and second axial ends (25,29) of the rotor (11) (see Fig. 1). Regarding claim 5, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 3, wherein the one or more shaft radial channels (34) are positioned between the first and second axial ends (25,29) of the rotor (11) (see Fig. 1). Regarding claim 6, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 3, wherein the rotor (11) comprises magnets (20) forming part of the rotor core (13), and wherein the axial channels (17) are positioned radially outboard of the radially inner exterior surface and radially inboard of the magnets (see Fig. 1). Regarding claim 7, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 3, wherein the oil adapted to cool the rotor core (13) flows through the one or more rotor radial channels (27) into the rotor axial channels (17) and exits the rotor (11) at the first and second axial ends, where said oil contacts the first and second axial ends (25,29) of the rotor (11) thereby providing further cooling to the rotor (11) (see Fig. 1 and col. 6, lines 14-32). Regarding claim 8, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 1, wherein the rotor axial channels (17) comprise eight rotor axial channels (17) circumferentially spaced apart around the rotor (11) (there are 16, comprising 8; see Fig. 2). PNG media_image2.png 495 514 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 8, wherein the one or more rotor radial channels (27) comprises eight rotor radial channels (27), each of the eight rotor radial channels (27) in fluid communication with a respective one of the eight rotor axial channels (17) (see col. 7, line 54-col. 8, line 2). Regarding claim 10, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 9, wherein the eight rotor radial channels (27) are axially aligned with each other between the rotor first and second axial ends (see Fig. 1). Regarding claim 12, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 9, wherein at least two of the rotor radial channels (27 and 31) are axially spaced apart from each other along a longitudinal axis of the electric motor (see Fig. 1). Regarding claim 11, HORII discloses the electric motor of claim 1, wherein the rotor axial channels (17) comprise four rotor axial channels (17) circumferentially spaced apart around the rotor (11), and wherein the one or more rotor radial channels (27) comprise four rotor radial channels (27), each of the four rotor radial channels (27) in fluid communication with a respective one of the four rotor axial channels (17) . (See Figs. 1 and 2 and col. 7, line 54-col. 8, line 2); there are sixteen of each, comprising four.) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-20100194220-A1 to Tatematsu discloses a motor with at least eight rotor axial channels in fluid communication with a hollow shaft channel wherein at least two of rotor radial channels are axially spaced apart; US-20210281134-A1 to LUX discloses a motor with rotor axial channels in fluid communication with a hollow shaft channel and radially inside of permanent magnets; US-20230361640-A1 to Madduri discloses a motor with at least eight rotor axial channels in fluid communication with a hollow shaft channel wherein at least two of rotor radial channels are axially spaced apart; US-20240039353-A1 to IKEMOTO discloses a motor with at least eight rotor axial channels in fluid communication with a hollow shaft channel; US-20240348117-A1 to Risko Cattell discloses a motor with at least eight rotor axial channels in fluid communication with a hollow shaft channel wherein at least two of rotor radial channels are axially spaced apart. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN STEFANON whose telephone number is (703)756-4648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday and alternate Fridays 8AM - 5PM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN STEFANON/ Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 28, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jun 11, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12494684
ROTOR OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12451742
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COOLING A ROTOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12316190
CASE STRUCTURE OF IN-WHEEL MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted May 27, 2025
Patent 9650015
BELT RETRACTOR FOR A VEHICLE SAFETY BELT
2y 5m to grant Granted May 16, 2017
Patent 9635986
SPINDLE AND ADAPTER FOR ROLL PAPER PRODUCT DISPENSERS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 02, 2017
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+68.2%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 183 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month