Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/309,639

ELECTROCHROMIC COMPOSITION, ANTI-PEEP FILM, AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 28, 2023
Examiner
ZHANG, RUIYUN
Art Unit
1782
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
743 granted / 1061 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
1129
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1061 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of group 1, claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 11/20/2025 is acknowledged. Since the elected group I, the electrochromic composition, has been found allowable over prior art of record; the non-elected group II, directed to a related product, which comprise the allowable electrochromic composition, has been brought back to be considered in this office action. Accordingly, the restriction requirement filed on 10/03/2025 has been withdrawn. Claim Objections Claims 1, 13 and 20 are objected to because of the following informalities: “in the colored state” should read “in a colored state”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 2, “a mass fraction ratio of…(0.1~2): (0.1~2): (2~10): (40~85)” is suggested to be changed to “a ratio by mass of…(0.1 to 2):(0.1 to 2):(2 to 10):(40 to 85)”. This suggestion is also applicable to claim 4. Claim 6, “by weight” is suggested to be changed to “by mass”, in order to be consistent with other claims. Claim 19 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 6, “the adjustable visual angle Ɵ” should read “the minimum visible angle Ɵ” by definition. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 1, 13 and 20 are rejected as being vague and indefinite when these claims recite “an electrogenic acid capable of producing protons under an action of external electrons”, because the meaning of “action of external elections” is not clear, it could be elections transferred from other components in the composition, injected from electrodes by applying an external electronic filed, by external election beams or other electron resource. In this office action, it is taken that the electrogenic acid is capable of producing protons by receiving electrons from other components in the composition. Claims 2-12 and 14-19 are also rejected for depending from claims 1 and 13, thus inclusion of indefinite features. Claim 9 is rejected as being vague and indefinite when these claims recite "refers to a salt…”. It is unclear as to whether “a salt that…” following “refers to” is merely an example of the molten salt or actually serve to limit the molten salt. In this office action, the “a salt that…” has been interpreted as to limit the molten salt. Claim 19 recites the limitation "the adjustable visual angle" in line 6. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome 112 rejections as set forth above. The reason for the allowance is that the claims are allowable over closest prior art Vincent et al (US 2003/0179432, ‘432 hereafter) and Zhang et al (CN 114015433). Vincent discloses a display device comprising transparent electrode layers and an electrochromic layer located between electrode layers (Figure 1, [0006]-[0008], [0014]); wherein the electrochromic layer comprises an electrochromic composition. The electrochromic composition comprises an indicator dye which changes colors with pH of the composition ([0024]-[0025], component (b), [0032]), reading upon acid-sensitive dye capable of switching colors in accordance with a change of proton concentration in the electrochromic composition; a compound change its protic state by an electron transfer reaction ([0024]-[0025], component (a), [0026], [0030]), reading upon electrogenic acid capable of producing protons under an action of external electrons; an ionically conductive material being an aqueous solution of and electrolyte ([0024]-[0025], component (c), [0033]), reading upon ionic liquid composed of dissociated ions; and a solvent ([0034); wherein the acid-sensitive dye, the electrogenic acid, the ionic liquid, and the solvent are mixed together. Zhang discloses an electrochromic material comprising a fluorane dye as a color-changing material and a cuprous salt as redox regulating agent to render the composition being capable of changing from a transparent state to a colored state (Fig. 2 and 7, [0004]-[0013], [0026]). However, the prior art of record does not expressly set forth or fairly suggest a electrochromic composition as recited in the present claims 1, 13 and 20, wherein the acid-sensitive dye is in the transparent state when the proton concentration of the electrochromic composition is 0, and is in a colored state when the proton concentration of the electrochromic composition is greater than 0. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RUIYUN ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-7934. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arron Austin can be reached on 571-272-8935. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RUIYUN ZHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1782
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 28, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600887
ONE-PART ADHESIVE FOR THERMOPLASTIC URETHANES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600848
RESIN COMPOSITION, MOLDED PRODUCT, LAMINATE, THERMOFORMED CONTAINER, BLOW-MOLDED CONTAINER, FILM, AGRICULTURAL FILM, PLANT MEDIUM, AND PIPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600891
URETHANE-BASED ADHESIVE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590174
CURABLE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING TELECHELIC POLYOLEFINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583874
COMPOUND, ANTI-REFLECTION FILM COMPRISING SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1061 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month