Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/309,895

COVER, LOCK AND ALIGNMENT MARK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 01, 2023
Priority
Feb 09, 2021 — EU 21156132.9 +1 more
Examiner
DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Procter & Gamble Company
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
1100 granted / 1598 resolved
-1.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
79 currently pending
Career history
1677
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1598 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/20/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5, 8, 10-14, 17-18, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cortopassi (US 4684023 A) in view of Ng Pak Leung et al. (US 2021/0047072 A1; hereinafter Ng Pak Leung). Regarding claims 1, 3, 5, 8, 10-14, and 17, Cortopassi discloses a content-identifying carton structure comprising a box (see Figures 2-3; base portion), a cover (i.e. lid) for the box, and a lock (48/50; Examiner notes that the 48/50 locks are on each side of the container) to reversibly maintain the cover in a closed position (Col 4 lines 17-27), the box comprising a base (16), sidewalls (14/18/28) and an opening (see Fig. 2; Examiner considers the opening to be the access to contents), the cover comprising a top (12) and flanks (26/44), the cover covering the opening and the cover covering at least a specific portion of a specific sidewall of the box when the cover is in the closed position, whereby at least one of the flanks and sidewalls comprises an alignment mark coinciding with the cover being in the closed position (see Figures 2-3; Examiner notes that the marks are exposed coinciding with when the lid is properly closed); whereby the alignment mark comprises both a flank alignment mark and a sidewall alignment mark (40/42; Examiner considers cuts to be “marks” as well), whereby the flank alignment mark and the sidewall alignment mark are aligned when the cover is in the closed position, whereby the lock is engaged by displacing the cover through rotation (i.e. hinged lid along fold 20). Examiner considers the locking mechanism to comprise an actuator since a pressing action is required to operate said locking mechanism. Cortopassi lacks teaching that detergent is placed within the container. Ng Pak Leung teaches a consumer product container comprising detergent product (300). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of Applicant’s filing to modify Cortopassi’s container to be used to hold detergent product (Ng Pak Leung; see Par. 0007). Examiner considers Cortopassi’s container capable of containing detergent products. Regarding claims 17-18, Cortopassi, as modified above, discloses a container comprising locking the container by displacing the cover until the alignment mark coincides with the cover being in the closed position (Cortopassi; see Figures 1-3). Examiner considers sliding the cover in a telescoping manner over the box to be a translation. Regarding claim 20, Cortopassi, as modified above, discloses a container comprising the lock emitting a clicking sound upon locking. Examiner considers the friction involved in locking/unlocking Cortopassi’s container to create a noise. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 6, and 15-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Pages 5-6, filed 10/20/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 3-8, 10-18, and 20 under USC 103(a)—in view of Fox and Ng Pak Leung have been fully considered and are persuasive. Fox fails to disclose a cover that engages through rotation (e.g. hinged lid). Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of USC 103(a)—Cortopassi in view of Ng Pak Leung. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER R DEMEREE whose telephone number is (571)270-1982. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NATHAN J NEWHOUSE can be reached at (571)272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER R DEMEREE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Jul 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595093
PACKING BOX
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595091
METHOD OF COLLAPSING A COLLAPSIBLE BOX
1y 7m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589908
TAKEOUT FOOD BOX WITH EXTRA FOOD POCKET
2y 0m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582987
CARRIER DEVICE FOR A DISPENSING DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577031
BIODEGRADABLE COOLER
5y 6m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1598 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month